On 06/10/2010 07:51 PM, Scott Ward wrote:
We are looking to do an large installation of Nagios. Is it possible to
monitor over 800 machines and over 14000 services?
Has anyone tried doing anything like this? If you have how successful was it
and how did you configure it?
We have plenty of
We are going to be using distributed monitoring for sure. We just cannot
decide whether we should use NDO to write directly to the database or us
NSCA to send back to the master server. Any suggestions?
Is there a frontend that actually uses the information in an NDO db? From
what I've read it
On 06/11/2010 03:04 PM, Scott Ward wrote:
We are going to be using distributed monitoring for sure. We just cannot
decide whether we should use NDO to write directly to the database or us
NSCA to send back to the master server. Any suggestions?
Is there a frontend that actually uses the
Can someone point out the patch location. I have searched nagios-devel
mailing list but could not find it. Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Michael Friedrich
michael.friedr...@univie.ac.at wrote:
Øyvind Nordang wrote:
Duplicate lines for each service check in
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:a...@op5.se]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 9:29 AM
To: Nagios Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Large Installation
Unless you desperately need performance data from satellite systems
handled properly, I'd invite you to give
Hi Scott,
You can also try Centreon software to manage your different pollers and
configuration:
http://www.centreon.com
Here is an overview of the functioning:
http://en.doc.centreon.com/CentreonArchitecture
To see how it looks like, here is a web demo:
http://demo.centreon.com
Best regards.
Hello All,
I am currently looking for an alternative to using Tivoli , TEC postemsg for
a rather large ( 6000 + ) remote environment.
I have had great success with Nagios in my small local/remote test environment
and the obvious cost savings without having TEC anymore is huge.
Can I use the
On 06/11/2010 04:08 PM, Scott Ward wrote:
How does Merlin compare with NDO in terms of resource usage?
merlin is fairly lightweight. What little memory its uses resides
primarily on the stack and fits well inside the stack of 1MiB.
Here's the output of ps wwaux | grep merlin on a master
The main things you will not get from Nagios that you almost always get with
Tivoli:
* High recurring licensing fees
* On-site Tivoli consultants
:)
Nagios does not give you out of the box the visualization dashboards that
Tivoli has but with Nagviz you can you make very nice graphical
I can attest / confirm what Andreas states about the merlin daemon.
BTW, Andreas, I just patched our code base to contain your 0.6.7 changes and
I will be posting that on Github for you and anyone else interested to check
out over the weekend.
Our tests so far are showing that with the Merlin
Our changes to Merlin allow N pollers to all write to the same database
without conflicts.
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental
Well,
Talking about Ninja, I installed on a Debian Lennt box. The
installation process seemed a bit buggy and I see some problems like
with scheduling scripts, but I find Ninja a useful tool.
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's
If you aren't actually using the data from NDO, there is little point in
creating the DB.
I would probably not use NDO to write directly from the satellites. Here is why:
- Double the network traffic. The satellites have to send check
results AND database writes.
- Less
13 matches
Mail list logo
