Hi All,
I now this is an old post, but i have a problem in monitoring a dhcp
server. Nagios is installed on a machine that is not on the same lan as
the dhcp server. After reading the help, i tried something like this:
cos...@cacti-1:/usr/local/nagios/libexec *./check_dhcp -v -u -s
10.0.0.2
Hi,
This is my first time ;)
Can anyone tell me something about distributed monitoring ?
We have two type of networks - public and corporate network.
In corporate network(s) we have a lot of devices which aren't monitored
now...
Nagios server is located in public network and can't be
Komuch wrote:
Hi,
This is my first time ;)
Can anyone tell me something about distributed monitoring ?
We have two type of networks - public and corporate network.
In corporate network(s) we have a lot of devices which aren't
monitored now...
Nagios server is located in public
On 07/07/2010 05:22 PM, Jelle Smet wrote:
Hi List,
How can I create an availability report of a hostgroup which does NOT take
the scheduled downtime of the individual hosts into account?
Try the reporting tool in Ninja. It can do what you want.
--
Andreas Ericsson
* Cosmin Neagu cosmin.ne...@omnilogic.ro [2010-07-08 10:12]:
So from what i see on the server:
DHCPD: DHCPDISCOVER received from client 0050.56a1.4fbf through relay
192.168.53.250
DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool class
DHCPD: there is no address pool for 192.168.53.250
Yes, you can do that. Look for distributed monitoring in the documentation.
It's fairly simple to set up.
Keep in mind that if you declare the public Nagios server to be the master,
that means that information leaves the corporate network; you may not want to
do that. You could also declare
In my environment, I have over 400 remote locations, each with 2 servers 15
linux clients. I have set up a Nagios 3 host server here at corporate running
NRPE to monitor the servers at each location. I also want to monitor the 15
linux clients at each location, I wanted to have one of the
Is anyone aware of documentation or test cases showing whether or not running
Nagios on VMware is a good idea? I realize the common opinion is that it is a
bad idea due to I/O but I am looking for something a bit more in depth.
Thanks
Is anyone aware of documentation or test cases showing whether or not
running Nagios on VMware is a good idea? I realize the common opinion is
that it is a bad idea due to I/O but I am looking for something a bit more
in depth.
I would also be interested in seeing some more detailed
# Is anyone aware of documentation or test cases showing whether or not
running Nagios on VMware is a good idea? I realize the common opinion is
that it is a bad idea due to I/O but I am looking for something a bit
more in depth.
We run a large part of our environment on VMware, however there
Sorry. It probably would of helped to include some of this information.
It would be a large deployment in terms of what I have seen others
using. There could be ~12 servers each with ~1,500 hosts and 300,000
service checks (almost all NSCA). We expect a lot of service checks per
host so we want
-Original Message-
From: Ryan C Ash [mailto:ryan.c.ash.l...@statefarm.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 10:01 AM
To: Nagios users
Subject: [Nagios-users] Running Nagios on Vmware
Is anyone aware of documentation or test cases showing whether or not
running
Nagios on VMware is a
Kent Saunders wrote:
We run a large part of our environment on VMware, however there are
certain things that we deem worthy of hardware, Nagios being one of
them. Since we rely on Nagios to inform us of problems across our
environment, we need it to be highly reliable, with performance
In my experience, there are weird things that happen with timing. That is, the
time
on a VM should be sync'd with a time source so no time is lost. However, the VM
has what I like to think of as seconds of variable length.
So when we tested with a VM a few years ago, the latency and execution
I run 2 Nagios with MRTG on 2 separate VMs on separate sites myself and have
been for over year. Since we have 2 sites, to circumvent the issue with
monitoring the ESXi server I leave that to the other site.
Site A monitors the ESXi server in Site B and vice versa. This also helps in
monitoring
For that size of a deployment you will definitely want to use dedicated
hardware.
Also, with 300,000 services the standard nagios web interface could end
up being quite slow. Our deployment has just over 21,000 services
(multiple remote collectors feeding data back into a primary collector,
Hi, is there a means to define a list of user accounts that cfg.cfg uses in
authorized_for_system_commands, authorized_for_system_commands, etc... so you
can define this list in one place rather than explicitly at each directive?
Whew... did not think this would work, but it's the only combo that DID work...
I only have two servers configured right now here at home, Ubuntu-10.04
(localhost with Nagios 3.20) and CentOS-5.4 (NRPE 2.12)
I had tried just check_nrpe!check_users with the args on the NRPE
(remotehost) side
18 matches
Mail list logo
