On 10/18/2011 04:19 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote:
Hi all!
We are doing some performance test with nagios 3.3.1 in following
environement.
Server 1
RHEL 5.5 64 bit
1CPU Xeon E3-1220 3.10 GHz
Memory8GB
Disk 450GB (Raid 1)
Server 2
RHEL 5.5 64 bit
2CPU Xeon E5630 2.53 GHz
On 18.10.2011 11:57, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Does notification process naturally effect the service check scheduling?
Not by much, no.
Not sure about that. Notifications are sent out during reaping the results and
therefor block the
main loop for as long as the notification takes. Usually
Andreas Ericsson さんは書きました:
On 10/18/2011 04:19 AM, Yu Watanabe wrote:
Hi all!
We are doing some performance test with nagios 3.3.1 in following
environement.
Server 1
RHEL 5.5 64 bit
1CPU Xeon E3-1220 3.10 GHz
Memory8GB
Disk 450GB (Raid 1)
Server 2
RHEL 5.5 64 bit
Sven Nierlein さんは書きました:
On 18.10.2011 11:57, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Does notification process naturally effect the service check scheduling?
Not by much, no.
Not sure about that. Notifications are sent out during reaping the results and
therefor block the
main loop for as long as the
On 18.10.2011 13:55, Yu Watanabe wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I have used the standard os mail command
'/bin/mail'
Do you think the command had affected the scheduling process?
How should i know? When i do a simple test, i can send up to 3 mails per
seconds with local mail delivery.
Sven Nierlein さんは書きました:
On 18.10.2011 13:55, Yu Watanabe wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I have used the standard os mail command
'/bin/mail'
Do you think the command had affected the scheduling process?
How should i know? When i do a simple test, i can send up to 3 mails per
seconds
Hi,
I need to monitor the clamd.amavisd binary, but having difficulty with
the check_procs command. When using the following check_procs, it
isn't able to identify any running processes:
# /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_procs -w 1: -c 1: -C clamd.amavisd -u amavis
PROCS CRITICAL: 0 processes
