Hi all,
Today when I noticed a root nearly full I looked to see
why Nagios hadn't flagged it. It was quickly apparent
when I saw Nagios wasn't going to run the next service
check until October of 2014!. I saw this for all services
with the last check having been the same year. The system
clock is
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:34:39AM -0700, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 07:30:19AM -0400, Kyle Tucker wrote:
check until October of 2014!. I saw this for all services
with the last check having been the same year. The system
clock is definitely correct. Once I force
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 08:24:21AM -0700, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Just to be sure, is that true for the earliest lines at midnight the
day you discovered the problem?
I discovered it today and just looked back through a week of archives and dates
are right on. I don't have log rotation on.
Log
I don't have log rotation on.
Apparently it's on by default, but that date's good as well.
[10-04-2009 00:00:00] LOG VERSION: 2.0
Log Rotation
[10-04-2009 00:00:00] LOG ROTATION: WEEKLY
--
- Kyle
-
ky...@panix.com http://www.panix.com/~kylet
If it helps, all Duration times show as ???, even for checks I just
forced and have the times back in sync.
--
- Kyle
-
ky...@panix.com http://www.panix.com/~kylet
-
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:48:39PM +0200, Arnau wrote:
Do you know if there is a way to force Nagios to send a notification
periodically?
I'd try here with an external command.
http://www.nagios.org/developerinfo/externalcommands/commandinfo.php?command_id=135
--
- Kyle
Hi all,
I have defined a custom service notification command that I am using to
send alerts to CA Spectrum. That part is working, but for every alert I
send, I am also getting a corresponding service notification by email to
the nagiosadmins contact group despite my service having an inherited
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:43:37PM -0300, Fernando Rocha wrote:
Probably you have the 'contact_groups' variable at the host definition, and
it will be implicitly inherite.
take a look at 'Implied Inheritance' from
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/objectinheritance.html
I just now
Is it possible for a single service instance to send an e-mail
on a WARNING condition and a page plus e-mail on a CRITICAL condition?
Would this require two separate service instances with different
notification_options? I'd really like to avoid having two service
definitions for
it is being discussed here again and again. Some working solution(s) attached.
For the simpler situations, wouldn't the introduction of a simple host
retry_check_interval be sufficient? It would fulfill my request and of
the OP it would seem as well.
--
- Kyle
Hi,
Nagios 2.0b5 on Solaris 10. I've been running this
setup for some time and just recently started seeing Internal
Server Error on page refreshes from Firefox, with Apache
reporting Premature end of script headers. The only changes
recently are that I increased the host and service
a pending-confirmation fix in CVS as well as a workaround (move =
your status.dat file back to the same filesystem).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Tucker
Sent: Tue 5/30/2006 8:39 AM
To: Nagios Mailing List
Subject: [Nagios-users] status.dat on /tmp causes
Hi,
I modified my host-notify-by-email command
to include a line to indicate how long a host had
been down. When I saw it come out in this HOST UP
recovery notification as zero seconds, some quick
further reading shed light on why. I know this will
be useful for re-notification of hosts
for that service. Ergo, if you set your service checks max to 15, after
15 minutes (assuming your delay is 60 seconds) your service will hit a
HARD CRITICAL, and host checks will fire.
That's not correct, host checks are performed as soon as a service check
returns some non-OK
Hi,
I have many hosts that are constantly giving me DOWN/UP state as they
are unreachable for certain periods. In an attempt to give the system more
time to become available, I increased the max_check_attempts from 2 to 5. At
2 the interval between retry attempts was 10 seconds. Now at 5,
absolutely necessary.
Suggest increasing the max_check_attempts on the SERVICE to a larger number,
this will avoid impacting the monitoring system as a whole.
/eli
On 5/22/06 11:45 AM, Kyle Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have many hosts that are constantly giving me DOWN/UP state
Hi all,
I have modified my notifications command such that
it checks that if $NOTIFICATIONTYPE = ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
then I am kicking off a couple actions; a snmpget and then
an external Nagios command to submit the service check. But
it runs the notification command for each recipient and
I want to be able to send an SMMP check straight to critical instead of
warning. I.e. a Wireless AP Interface has UP and Down. So instead of
sending that to a Warning status I would like it to go straight to
Critical. I have tried using the check_snmp string, however it requires
a -w
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, ThomasC. wrote:
I would like to use eventhandlers to restart apache on nagios server
because
it sometimes fails.
My issue is that i have a password on the certificate that i have to give
when restarting apache...do you know how i can handle this ?
Use
I've set up a distributed server with freshness checks
for each service being submitted passively set to 1 on
the central server. But in the main nagios.cfg on each
server (central and distributed), what should the global
check_service_freshness parameter be set to? I don't see
anything
Hi,
At out colocation site, the systems I am monitoring
have two border routers by which they can get out, so both
of these would need to be down for me to not want to monitor
hosts and services beyond these. Is this where comma separated
parent hosts would come into play? If not, how
Am I missing something fundamental about this command ?
It appears that you missed the 'min:max' vs. 'max:min' thing on the ranges,
but 1) that's a common oversight, and 2) it doesn't appear to be the real
reason you're getting nothing but warnings.
James, thanks for all this detailed
Darn - never mind - I found the setting. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. :(
--
- Kyle
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.panix.com/~kylet
-
---
This
Hi,
I had check_snmp from the 1.4.2 plugins working great with
Net-SNMP 5.2.2 on Solaris 8. I have built it all on Solaris 10 now
for my production server and I get mangled data back from check_snmp
going to the exact same snmpd client.
Here's a good working Solaris 8 query from
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new extend directive
in Net-SNMP and the symbolic OIDs literally contain
a quote. I can't get check_snmp to be satisfied with
the quotes I need to pass. I need to be able to pass
nsExtendResult.extt2 to snmpd. Any suggestions?
Thanks.
, Kyle Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new extend directive
in Net-SNMP and the symbolic OIDs literally contain
a quote. I can't get check_snmp to be satisfied with
the quotes I need to pass. I need to be able to pass
nsExtendResult.extt2 to snmpd. Any
-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Tucker
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:26 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed servers and parenting
Hi,
I have Nagios set up in distributed mode. I am
wondering if this should have a direct
I'm currently searching for a way to monitor an active directory using
nagios. The mainproblem I have is that I my active directory knowledge
tends to zero. I'm currently searching for docs where I can find atleast
the ports which I have to monitor, but until now without success. I had
the
Hi,
I have Nagios set up in distributed mode. I am
wondering if this should have a direct affect on how
parenting is set up. I think visually from the status
maps, it would look right to have the all clients have
the distributed monitor system be its parent and perhaps
have the central
I'm confused about my Nagios configuration. My Nagios monitoring host is
Linux (Slackware ) box. All clients I need to monitor are Tru64 boxes.
So, I was able to compile NRPE on the Tru64 boxes, but it appears I need all
plugins locally on the system. So I want to install the standard
In order for freshness checks to work in 2.0 and up, you have to set as
follows.
check_period 24x7
passive_checks_enabled 1
active_checks_enabled0 ; these are all passive checks
check_freshness 1
Hi,
I have compiled the check_snmp plugin from the
nagios-plugins-1.4.2 source code against Net-SNMP 5.2.2.
All of the options I pass to check_snmp don't get passed
along to snmpget, yet they're in the source code. Any
clue what's up? Here's successful use of snmpget and what
gets passed
32 matches
Mail list logo
