I'm continuing to iron out the wrinkles with 3.5.1 and distributed
monitoring. I'm using mod_gearman to submit and receive events from
two distributed pollers.
Every now and again, I'll get something similar in the log on the
centralized collecting machine:
CRITICAL: Return code of
Do you get many of those error messages in the logs at once, or just
one at a time?
Only one thought: what are the permissions on your $USER$ variables?
Nagios on my systems setuid() to nonroot after startup, and if it gets
SIGHUP to reload config, but can't read the file defining $USER*$,
will
Do you get many of those error messages in the logs at once, or just
one at a time?
Only one thought: what are the permissions on your $USER$ variables?
Nagios on my systems setuid() to nonroot after startup, and if it gets
SIGHUP to reload config, but can't read the file defining $USER*$,
On 8/22/13 13:51, C. Bensend wrote:
CRITICAL: Return code of 127 is out of bounds. Make sure the plugin
youre trying to run actually exists. (worker: collector.domain.org)
Hi,
if this is the collector host, why does it have a mod-gearman worker installed?
If nagios would have
run the check by
On 8/22/13 13:51, C. Bensend wrote:
CRITICAL: Return code of 127 is out of bounds. Make sure the plugin
youre trying to run actually exists. (worker: collector.domain.org)
Hi,
if this is the collector host, why does it have a mod-gearman worker
installed? If nagios would have
run the
On 8/28/13 14:43, C. Bensend wrote:
Are you saying I just need gearmand running on the collector?
Well, i assumed it. You are the only one which really can tell that.
You will need a worker on each host which should run checks. If your
collector should not run any checks, than no worker is
On 8/28/13 14:43, C. Bensend wrote:
Are you saying I just need gearmand running on the collector?
Well, i assumed it. You are the only one which really can tell that.
You will need a worker on each host which should run checks. If your
collector should not run any checks, than no worker is
Hey folks,
I'm continuing to iron out the wrinkles with 3.5.1 and distributed
monitoring. I'm using mod_gearman to submit and receive events from
two distributed pollers.
Every now and again, I'll get something similar in the log on the
centralized collecting machine:
CRITICAL: Return
Hey folks,
I am in the process of implementing a distributed monitoring
architecture, and I'm having some problems with host state. Here
are the specs:
Nagios v3.4.1
RHEL 6.3
Using NSCA to send results to passive collector
Yes, I have 'translate_passive_host_checks' set on the
Hi
Thanks Dan!
I'm reading about check_mk with Livestatus and I think it'll help me.
--
Wallace Gerheim
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
Hello folks,
I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users mailing list.
I was looking for addons for Nagios but i didn't find one wich attends me.
Let me explain my scenario. If someone could help me, i ll be grateful.
I have one nagios central with centreon. I have another nagios (worker),
with centreon,
Gerheim wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users mailing list.
I was looking for addons for Nagios but i didn't find one wich attends me.
Let me explain my scenario. If someone could help me, i ll be grateful.
I have one nagios central with centreon. I have another nagios
On 30/03/11 14:00, Gerheim wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users mailing list.
I was looking for addons for Nagios but i didn't find one wich attends me.
Let me explain my scenario. If someone could help me, i ll be grateful.
I have one nagios central with centreon. I have
My vote is to look at Multisite and livestatus from check_mk project.
Dan
From: Gerheim [mailto:wallacegerh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:01 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring
Hello folks,
I'm new on Nagios and nagios
Hi Wallace,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Gerheim wallacegerh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users mailing list.
I was looking for addons for Nagios but i didn't find one wich attends me.
Let me explain my scenario. If someone could help me, i ll be grateful.
I have one
Thanks everyone for reply.
I think i wasn't correctly on my explanation ...
My nagios central have a lot of objects (included nagios client objects). I
want to manipulate only a few on nagios client. I'm looking to decentralize
the scope of clients.
For example: i have 3 clients. Each one are
Good day all.
I've taken over ownership of a very hacked and mutilated nagios
installation in house, and I'm busy building a migration plan and
designing the new nagios instance.
I have some questions which the documentation is not making apparent,
likely due to my lack of understanding nagios,
On 18 May 2010 15:21, Christoph Kluenter c...@iphh.net wrote:
I am thinking about testing DNX ( dnx.sf.net )
But since one can't define which check will run on which
node, we would have to reconfigure a lot of firewalls.
Would dnx be worth this hassle ? Any experiences ?
I'm interested too
wrong 3d before, sorry
On 6 May 2010 11:55, Enrico Zimol lomiz.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi at all,
I'm newbie on nagios and I'm writing here to ask you for suggestions
abut how to structure my monitoring situation.
I've to monitor linux servers for about 15/20 customers, from 1 to 5
server for
Hi,
I'm facing the same issue. And I'd like to find a way to turn off the
monitoring on the remote host from the web interface on the main server.
Because operators are not abble to log on the remote monitoring servers.
Does anyone know if there is an add-on abble to do this ? I think about
Hi Gael,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Gael Cheron gael.che...@free.fr wrote:
I'm facing the same issue. And I'd like to find a way to turn off the
monitoring on the remote host from the web interface on the main server.
Because operators are not abble to log on the remote monitoring
From my knowledge, you'll either need to log in to the
server running the remote nagios instance and disable checks
in the configuration, or turn notifications off at the
instance running the web interface. Depending on your
needs, it might seem a decent fit to simply turn off
notifications yet
Hi,
I'm in the process of setting up a distributed monitoring system and have hit
on an issue where one of my operators wants to disable a check in the web
interface but the check is actually being run on the remote distributed system.
How can I disable the check on the remote host in this
Sorry list, I treated my last post as an email and did not observe proper
list-fu!
Marc,
Thank you for pointing me to the distributed doc and for your explanations. I
feel I am very close. Right now if I run:
/usr/local/nagios/libexec/eventhandlers/submit_check_result Athena 'PING' OK
Marc Powell ha scritto in data 25/09/2009 14.14:
It sounds like you're looking for Freshness Checks. It's discussed in
the Distributed Monitoring documentation.
Thank's Marc,
Meanwhile I've read better the documentation, the freshness threshold does the
trick.
Thank's!
Simon
Hi,
I am having a problem regarding Latency.
Here my Technical information:
All O.S: Ubuntu 9.03 Server//Nagios3.0.6
Main Server DL-380 4GB RAM and Quad-Core 3.0Mhz
My distributed Nagios3 Satellites are reporting Latency, although no
CPU, Mem, Disk or other peaks are evident:
Hosts:
Check
SNMP option for bandwidth usage monitoring
with pnp4nagios compatibility?
Regards,
Harald
-Original Message-
From: Harald Böhmecke harald.boehme...@bertelsmann.de
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring - Freshness and Latency
Date: Tue, 07
Hi all,
I currently have 1 Master Nagios Server and 4 Nagios Satellites which do the
hard work.
I have defined all Parents (dependencies) on the Master Server.
Do I also need to define the Parents on the Satellites? Or will the Master
Server (the one sending out Notifications) automatically
: Harald Böhmecke [mailto:harald.boehme...@bertelsmann.de]
Sent: Sunday, 5 July 2009 11:54 p.m.
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring Parents
Hi all,
I currently have 1 Master Nagios Server and 4 Nagios Satellites which do the
hard work.
I have
Using nagios 3.0.5
Distributed Monitoring setup
Hosts and Services show updated status information but the status of the
host or service does not change from up on the central server. Status
on the distributed servers is reflected correctly in the web interface.
Why might this be?
thanks,
Paul
On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Paul Landauer wrote:
Using nagios 3.0.5
Distributed Monitoring setup
Hosts and Services show updated status information but the status of
the
host or service does not change from up on the central server.
Status
on the distributed servers is reflected
Hi Paul,
Please always respond on list so that others now, and in the future,
can learn from your experience and so that you can benefit from the
experience of others on the list. More below...
On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Paul Landauer wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 12:06 -0600, Marc
On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Paul Landauer wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 12:06 -0600, Marc Powell wrote:
I'm using 2 servers following the documentation at
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/distributed.html
Thanks.
- example host and service definitions from both servers
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2008 14:01
To: Nick Lunt
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring without direct
network connection
Nick Lunt wrote:
Hi folks
nagios
-Original Message-
From: Nick Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:01 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring without direct
networkconnection
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Lunt wrote:
It's not that the connections will be up/down it's more that they simply
won't be there. Most of our clients are NHS (hospitals) and we have to
have a secure vpn connection that we dial into on an as needed basis.
We currently
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Lunt wrote:
It's not that the connections will be up/down it's more that they simply
won't be there. Most of our clients are NHS (hospitals) and we have to
have a secure vpn connection that we dial into on an
Nick Lunt wrote:
Hi folks
nagios 3.0.5 on RHEL 4u6.
We have nagios servers all over the uk and we want to get all alerts
from each nagios server to a central nagios server at our main offices.
We do not have permanent network connectivity to the remote nagios
servers so using NSCA is
Hi folks
nagios 3.0.5 on RHEL 4u6.
We have nagios servers all over the uk and we want to get all alerts
from each nagios server to a central nagios server at our main offices.
We do not have permanent network connectivity to the remote nagios
servers so using NSCA is not an option.
Try looking at opsview , it is doing what you want with nagios as a component
in his setup.
http://www.opsview.org/
On Friday 28 November 2008 11:53:28 Nick Lunt wrote:
Hi folks
nagios 3.0.5 on RHEL 4u6.
We have nagios servers all over the uk and we want to get all alerts
from
Thanks for the plug, but Opsview is not really suitable for this. We
have distributed monitoring out-of-the-box, but it requires the
permanent connection between slaves and the master which Nick says he
hasn't got.
If you will have temporary connections (that go up and down), we have
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 November 2008 15:35
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring without direct
networkconnection
Thanks for the plug, but Opsview is not really suitable for this. We
have distributed monitoring out-of-the-box
On 28 Nov 2008, at 16:00, Nick Lunt wrote:
So I'll have nagios clients - nagios - send_email - primary
nagios server - postfix - mail filter - send_nsca - nagios
If I get this working I'll treat myself to curry :)
You deserve a vindaloo.
So basically, you are using email from the
If I get this working I'll treat myself to curry :)
Try a coconut milk + pineapple curry. Serve with ginger salad. Little
closer to heaven. ~BAS-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
Hi,
I am working on setting up a distributed monitoring system with Nagios
(actually Groundwork). I have 3 child servers and 1 parent server, using
NSCA to send passive check results from the children to the parent server.
My question is about how Nagios (version 2.5) will behave when an on
Hello all, I have Nagios up and running and have made myself familiar
with nrpe and nsca. I have read and think I understand the Nagios
distributed monitoring setup quite clearly.
The issue I have now is that I need to setup a distributed monitoring
setup where the distributed server will be
mark redding wrote:
Hi all,
I currently have Nagios 2.10 installed on a couple of machines, one of
which is configured as a master and the other as a slave.
I have a script running on the slave which rsync's up the configs from
the master and performs health checks of the master to see that it
Hi all,
I currently have Nagios 2.10 installed on a couple of machines, one of
which is configured as a master and the other as a slave.
I have a script running on the slave which rsync's up the configs from
the master and performs health checks of the master to see that it is
running (and if it
We have our monitoring configured and everything is working great
checking all our windows servers through a single windows server running
nrpe_nt. The problem we are having is when one of our Linux Nagios
servers goes down and doesn't send any results to the master Nagios
server. When this
-
From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 1:36 PM
To: Jeff Shumard - DefenseWeb Technologies
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring with nrpe_nt and
freshness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/07 01:11 PM, Jeff Shumard - DefenseWeb Technologies wrote:
We have our monitoring configured and everything is working great
checking all our windows servers through a single windows server running
nrpe_nt. The problem we are having is
We have our monitoring configured and everything is working great
checking all our windows servers through a single windows server running
nrpe_nt. The problem we are having is when one of our Linux Nagios
servers goes down and doesn't send any results to the master Nagios
server. When this
Hi Sean,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Sean McAvoy wrote:
On further investigations it looks as though the problem is with the
time taken to submit the results back to nagios via send_nsca.
I have read about a couple different options for getting results back
quickly. One being a bulk system of
] [mailto:nagios-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean McAvoy
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 12:09 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring Freshness
checkingfailing then recovering
On further investigations it looks as though the problem
, October 17, 2007 7:19:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring Freshness checkingfailing
then recovering
Sean;
I have a very large deployment so I use this tool:
http://www.nagioscommunity.org/wiki/index.php/OCP_Daemon
This daemon runs on each of the distributed servers while
Hello,
I have 1 central nagios system with 5 distributed servers. I have
enabled freshness checking on both central and remote systems. I am
constantly seeing services go to unknown status for 1-3 minutes and
then recover.
on the remotes I have:
check_service_freshness=1
Hi Marco,
I will set this up.
Thanks a lot!
Simon
From: Marco Supino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May-09-07 1:43 AM
To: Simon Marcil; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring Web Interface Issue
Hi,
I have the same scenario
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco
Supino
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: Simon Marcil; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring Web Interface Issue
Hi,
I have the same
);
#endif
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Shumard - DefenseWeb Technologies
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 20:58
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring Web Interface Issue
I have a distributed monitoring setup. I have several servers reporting
back to a central server. The central server also does a couple checks
but most of it's hosts and services are disabled (because it receives
the info from other servers).
The problem I have is with the web interface. In
] On Behalf Of Simon
Marcil
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 02:59
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring Web Interface Issue
I have a distributed monitoring setup. I have several servers reporting
back to a central server. The central server also does
Hi Folks ,
I have a distribute nagios configuration running well . Except that the
monitoring server start to send notification either the configuration is set
to no in this monitoring . ( enable_notifications=0 )
I using Nagios 1.2 with SUSE 9 .
Another questions. Is it any way to do host
Dears,
I have one nagios server working in my company, and I
need to add another nagios server to monitor another servers in other
subnets,
I don't know if there's any solution to have 2 nagios servers(1 central
nagios) and 1 monitor screen... it's mean the second server will
.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Moayad
Mohammad
Sent: 22 January 2007 11:29
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring
Dears,
I have one nagios server working in my company
I'm running Nagios is a distributed environment which is working very
well. I would like to add a little redundancy to the
picture now that I have everything working. ;-)
...
It seems that a secondary cold spare might be the best solution.
Then there are maintenance issues with keeping
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 09:51 -0700, Mike Koponick wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I’m running Nagios is a distributed environment which is working very
well. I would like to add a little redundancy to the picture now that
I have everything working. ;-)
Since I’m running a distributed environment,
Title: Distributed Monitoring - Redundancy
Hello Everyone,
Im running Nagios is a distributed environment which is working very well. I would like to add a little redundancy to the picture now that I have everything working. ;-)
Since Im running a distributed environment, how can I add a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Koponick
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:52 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring - Redundancy
Hello Everyone,
I'm running
Ive setup a distributed monitoring server. One
issue Im seeing is that the distributed server only updates the central
server every 4-6 minutes.
I have service checks running every 90 seconds on the
distributed server. I have it set to obsess over services.
Is there any way to adjust
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
InnovationsTech, Matthew ThomasSent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006
5:06 PMTo: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject:
[Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring
Ive setup a distributed
monitoring server. One issue Im seeing is that the distributed server only
updates
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:06:08PM -0400, InnovationsTech, Matthew Thomas wrote:
ran, or adjust how often the distributed server updates the central
server?
If you are obsessing over services, then send_nsca is called for
each and every service check.
I have freshness turned on, and it always
.
From: Morris, Patrick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006
20:29
To: InnovationsTech, Matthew
Thomas; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users]
Distributed Monitoring
Resultswill be getting sent
toyour ocsp commandevery time a check result comes back
Hello all,
I'm trying to setup a distributed monitoring system.
At the start all looked fine too me, but now I'm having some problems on
not receiving all passive checks from other hosts.
The machine is a Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz system with 512 MB RAM.
The load is minimal. The only
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 12:08 +0100, Rob Hassing wrote:
Hello all,
Hi Rob,
I'm trying to setup a distributed monitoring system.
At the start all looked fine too me, but now I'm having some problems on
not receiving all passive checks from other hosts.
Distributed monitoring is waaay cool. :)
74 matches
Mail list logo
