[Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt.

2009-01-16 Thread Jonathan Call
I am running a distributed monitoring system using Nagios 2.11 on FreeBSD 6.3. I use NSCA to send host and services events to the central server from the slave servers and have always had the following problem: A distributed server notices a host service is non-Ok and fires off check-host-alive.

Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt.

2009-01-16 Thread Patrick Morris
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Jonathan Call wrote: I am running a distributed monitoring system using Nagios 2.11 on FreeBSD 6.3. I use NSCA to send host and services events to the central server from the slave servers and have always had the following problem: A distributed server notices a host

Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt.

2009-01-16 Thread Jonathan Call
-Original Message- From: Patrick Morris [mailto:patrick.mor...@hp.com] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:40 AM To: Jonathan Call Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt. ... I'm not sure exactly how

Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt.

2009-01-16 Thread Marc Powell
On Jan 16, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Patrick Morris wrote: The max_check_attempts only applies to active checks, not the passive ones you're sending the central server (at least I assume when you said max_retry_interval you meant max_check_attempts) -- and you may note that SOFT and HARD are

Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt.

2009-01-16 Thread Jonathan Call
-Original Message- From: Marc Powell [mailto:m...@ena.com] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:20 PM To: nagios-users Mailinglist Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt. On Jan 16, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Patrick Morris wrote: The max_check_attempts

Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first attempt.

2009-01-16 Thread Marc Powell
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Jonathan Call wrote: http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/configmain.html#passive_host_chec ks_are_soft If they're all assumed to be SOFT, then a host failure would never trigger a notification? My interpretation of the parameter is that passive host results