Re: [Nagios-users] prioritizing state returns

2009-11-16 Thread Terry
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Terry td3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have an nsclient++ checkdrivesize check in place.  There is a weird condition where with microsoft clusters, after a failover event, the passive node still has the drive letters around.  This causes the check to return

Re: [Nagios-users] prioritizing state returns

2009-11-16 Thread Martin Melin
So the issue is that you have a single check that checks all the drives on the machine, and then return whatever it considers the worst state - in this case UNKNOWN? Couldn't you simply have one check per drive? This way, you'll know if more than one drive goes out of disk space at the same time

Re: [Nagios-users] prioritizing state returns

2009-11-16 Thread Terry
This is what I ended up doing. Here's a snippet of checking both cluster nodes and the cluster drives themselves. Sorry for not thinking outside of the box to begin with: define service { use service-active-perf-30 host_name cluster1a,cluster1b

[Nagios-users] prioritizing state returns

2009-11-13 Thread Terry
Hello, I have an nsclient++ checkdrivesize check in place. There is a weird condition where with microsoft clusters, after a failover event, the passive node still has the drive letters around. This causes the check to return an unknown status for those drives: : UNKNOWN: Could not get