Hello,
I have a problem after a server restart. I am checking the used space
disk with check_net plugins that comes to work with pnsclient.
Pnsclient is installed on server and running fine (restarted it btw).
When i launch the service by hand i get this :
../libexec/check_nt -H 10.8.1.3 -p 1248
I have problem with check_http checking the url:
http://192.168.25.191:4056/CICS/CWBA/DFH$WB1A
Problem is $
in services.cfg:
check_command
check_http_new!/CICS/CWBA/DFH\$WB1A!4056!successfully
in checkcommands.cfg:
command_namecheck_http_new
command_line
Hi,
You just have to do this in your services.cfg :
check_command
check_http_new!/CICS/CWBA/DFH\$$WB1A!4056!successfully
-- put an additional $.
That's all folks !!
Davy Gaussen
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Hi!
Why allowed_hosts isn't present in version 2.0... ?
I'm not using xinetd, and now I can't set allowed hosts.
Is there a solution, without xinetd or iptables?
Thanks!
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
Title: Message
Hi Mark,
I too had submitted an e-mail asking if
passing the host properties along to the services would have some detrimental
impact, but I didnt receive a reply. I agree that it would certainly
make the services.cfg file much simpler to maintain if you didnt have to
Steve,
Yes I am certain I defined the host. I think the issue was caused
because I basically did a cut and paste from the host file on the
distributed server to the central server. I remarked out the ip of the
box IVAN (as well as many others) in the host file afterward and I think
these
I tried the telnet central server port and was able to connect to
the port with out a problem.
I am so confused. :)
Sumit Malhotra wrote:
Should be ...to confirm...
telnet central server port
Where port is on which you have configured NSCA on central server - most
probably 5667)
If it's
Should be ...to confirm...
telnet central server port
Where port is on which you have configured NSCA on central server - most
probably 5667)
If it's getting timed out, it shouldn't respond.
Thanks.
Sumit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
---question startAnyone know why does my Host State Breakdowns DOWN show over 100% for this one site?
UP Unscheduled 0d 0h 0m 0s 0.000% 0.000% Scheduled 0d 0h 0m 0s 0.000% 0.000%
Total 0d 0h 0m 0s 0.000% 0.000%
DOWN Unscheduled 32d 22h 13m 50s
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 07:27:47AM +0100, Frederik Vanhee wrote:
Why don't you use the hostgroup_name in the hostextinfo definition ?
Because I didn't know that hostgroup_name was possible in hostextinfo.
It is not documented in xodtemplate.html for 2.0rc2, but has now been
verified to work.
I have my plugins in /usr/local/bin on the client and had a similiar
issue and wound up just making a /usr/local/nagios directory and inside
that directory created a symlink to /usr/local/bin as libexec and now
everything works fine.
-Don
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 08:32 -0500, Chad Osmond wrote:
I
Nevermind, my bad, I replied to wrong issue...sorry folks.
-Don
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 08:32 -0500, Chad Osmond wrote:
I just upgraded to 2.0rc2 and it seems that my check_disk_smb.pl doesn't
work any more. Any one have a suggestion?
I've verified that utils.pm does exist in the
I would actually be willing to except this as an answer
here is the script I am using for submit_check_results
#!/bin/sh
# Arguments:
# $1 = host_name (Short name of the host that the service is associated
with)
# $2 = svc_description (Description of the service)
# $3 = state_string (A
Braddy,
Unfortunelly this is the default configuration for all UOL (ISP here at
Brazil) users. :S It's not only annoyng but a great tool to leave their
users' mailbox empty. Because I'll never lose even 10 sec. confirming that
my e-mail exists. There's another way to do it (more smart for sure).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brady Maxwell
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:13 PM
To: Mike Koponick
Cc: Sumit Malhotra; Nagios users
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] NSCA messages
ok another question same topic
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:48 -0200, Marcel Mitsuto Fucatu Sugano wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:32 -0200, Fernando Lima wrote:
Braddy,
Unfortunelly this is the default configuration for all UOL (ISP here at
Brazil) users. :S It's not only annoyng but a great tool to leave their
users'
Title: Message
Toto, I don't have an UOL account. I don't know the person that have this
UOL account, my intention was to explain why the list receives those
messages.
cheers,
Fernando
LimaSchlumberger
Security
Engineer[EMAIL PROTECTED]Office: +55 21 3824 6954Mobile. : +55 21 9888
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sim
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:48 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Migrate Nagios 1.3 to 2.0
Hi!
Is Nagios 2.0 full compatible with last
Hi
All!
I have major problem
with getting notifications :-(
Here`s my
configs:
Miscommands.cfg
define
command{
command_name
notify-by-email
command_line /usr/bin/printf "%b" "* Nagios
*\n\nNotification Type: $NOTIFICATIONTYPE$\n\nService: $SERVICEDESC$\nHost:
What version are you running and on what
OS?
-Lori
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006
3:57 PM
To:
nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Major
notification problem
Dear Folks,
Mainly off topic - related to Reporting
Firstly some observations and corrections to my recent letters about
Reporting.
1 Use of DBD::RAM to at one fell swoop download the Nagios all
hosts/services report and stash it
in an in-core table (prior to filtering with SELECT and saving
Hi folks,
early this morning Nagios (that means: check_mailq) claimed ALL of my
hosts to have increasing mailqueues which went up to 40 mail waiting
there and then cleared again.
But none of the those hosts has received or sent mail around that period!
They are Debian Sarge stable and
22 matches
Mail list logo
