On Friday January 16 2009 05:13:02 am Chris wrote:
I downloaded nagios 3.0.6-1 tarball and made an RPM (rpmbuild -ba
/path/to/nagios.spec). I now have the RPMs under
/usr/src/packages/RPMS/i586/. If I run rpm -ivh
nagios-3.0.6-1.i586.rpm I get error:
error: Failed dependencies:
Hello all,
i'm new to the list even though i'm not new to nagios. I've taken over an
installation on an ubuntu -linux and made local emails (to root or to nagios)
being forwarded to some administration account. This made me realize some
enormous email-traffic:
My nagios-service sends
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 12:13 -0700, Matthew Tice wrote:
I'm interested in using the nsca addon - but only the daemon. I
thought I could just open an tcp connection to the daemon and send my
update manually:
You can setup a netcat listener on your nagios host, create a script
similar to this
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:46 AM, Markus Schreier wrote:
Hello all,
i'm new to the list even though i'm not new to nagios. I've taken
over an installation on an ubuntu -linux and made local emails (to
root or to nagios) being forwarded to some administration account.
This made me realize
Thank you.
But I have neither firewall nor SELinux enabled. In deed for a moment worked,
but a couple of hours later it didn't work again.
It's really weird.
- Mensaje original
De: Kevin Keane subscript...@kkeane.com
CC: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Enviado: jueves, 15 de
Christian Iñiguez challenger_jos...@yahoo.com.mx wrote:
Thank you.
But I have neither firewall nor SELinux enabled. In deed for a moment
worked, but a couple of hours later it didn't work again.
It's really weird.
Have you checked your DHCP logs? Do you have enough leases available in
the
Hello Marc,
thanks for your reply.
yes you are wright. My notify-commands are put in as event-handler for all
hosts and all services. I will just remove the event_handler line. I also set
event_handler_enabled to 0 and all should be fine.
Again, thank you
best regards,
Markus
I put in a host
Thanks for the responses. The reason I didn't want to go the NSCA client
route is that I didn't want to have to deploy a binary to each node I'm
monitoring - really it just comes down to keeping things as simple as I can
(which you wouldn't be able to tell based upon what I'm requesting).
That worked great, thanks much for your help!
PJ
-Original Message-
From: Marc Powell [mailto:m...@ena.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:53 PM
To: nagios-users Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Acknowledged by user + Service action url
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:51 PM,
I am running a distributed monitoring system using Nagios 2.11 on
FreeBSD 6.3. I use NSCA to send host and services events to the central
server from the slave servers and have always had the following problem:
A distributed server notices a host service is non-Ok and fires off
check-host-alive.
Hi All!
When you acknowledge a problem, there is a checkbox Send Notification
that is checked by default. Is there anyway short of editing the source
code to change the default so that it is unchecked by default? Any info
is appreaciated.
Regards,
jimmo
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Jonathan Call wrote:
I am running a distributed monitoring system using Nagios 2.11 on
FreeBSD 6.3. I use NSCA to send host and services events to the central
server from the slave servers and have always had the following problem:
A distributed server notices a host
I have been using check_all_interfaces.pl for a while on 32bit machines and
it works great for checking the interfaces for errors. I would like to use
it on a 64bit machine, but it gives the error:
CRITICAL: Could not read table by SNMP: Counter length too long (5 bytes)
due to it trying to
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Morris [mailto:patrick.mor...@hp.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:40 AM
To: Jonathan Call
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first
attempt.
...
I'm not sure exactly how
On Jan 16, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Patrick Morris wrote:
The max_check_attempts only applies to active checks, not the passive
ones you're sending the central server (at least I assume when you
said
max_retry_interval you meant max_check_attempts) -- and you may note
that SOFT and HARD are
Ever since I upgraded my server running Nagios 3.0.6 to 10.5.6, I
can't get Nagios to launch. When I try to start it via the CLI
command, the following gets returned in the nagios.log:
[1232136591] Nagios 3.0.6 starting... (PID=27107)
[1232136591] Local time is Fri Jan 16 14:09:51 CST 2009
-Original Message-
From: Marc Powell [mailto:m...@ena.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:20 PM
To: nagios-users Mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Hosts report 'DOWN, HARD' after first
attempt.
On Jan 16, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Patrick Morris wrote:
The max_check_attempts
-Original Message-
From: Randall R. Saeks [mailto:rsa...@district30.k12.il.us]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:55 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3.0.6 on 10.5.6 Server
Ever since I upgraded my server running Nagios 3.0.6 to 10.5.6, I
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Jonathan Call wrote:
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/configmain.html#passive_host_chec
ks_are_soft
If they're all assumed to be SOFT, then a host failure would never
trigger a notification?
My interpretation of the parameter is that passive host results
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/01/09 11:48 AM, Michel MAYEN wrote:
Hi all,
I use Nagios 3.0.6
I can't find any informations on the flag failure_prediction_enabled
in service definition. What is the effect of this flag ?
First result for 'nagios failure prediction' on
20 matches
Mail list logo
