Russell Adams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:10:45PM -0700, Tom Ammon wrote:
Russell,
Cacti is pretty SNMP-centric, but in our environment that is about all
we are using it for anyway. I'm no cacti expert, but to me, that's the
beauty of it - I don't really know the inner workings
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:42:05AM -0700, Tom Ammon wrote:
That is probably where our differing environments cause us to need
different things. In my environment I monitor hundreds, but not
thousands of devices. And they are all in my control. If I worked for a
large ISP, I'm sure I would
Hi,
Anyone implemented any sort of lun monitoring plugin? Just gathering ideas
on what is already out there before I get my hands dirty. Thanks.
Marc
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge
Marc Ismael wrote:
Hi,
Anyone implemented any sort of lun monitoring plugin? Just gathering ideas
on what is already out there before I get my hands dirty. Thanks.
You're far too anxious to let others solve your problems. It was less than
two hours ago you sent your earlier email, and you
What would you monitor?
Path availability would be the only item of note, and querying that
information will vary by SAN driver and OS.
Otherwise a LUN should show up as a disk with a filesystem that could
be monitored with existing tools.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:14:57AM +0800, Marc Ismael
Andreas, I have absolutely *no clue* what you are talking about, this is the
first email I sent for this month to nagios-users.
I'm guilty on the other point you raised, I'm interested if there's
nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net something I can do to effectively measure
how busy a lun is, e.g.
Thanks Russell, I've already got the path and target visibility monitoring
covered.
How about in terms of performance though? Is there value in monitoring io,
e.g. via iostat or another utility?
On 2/3/09, Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
What would you monitor?
Path
statistics
Date: February 2, 2009 8:32:07 AM CST
-
From: marcism...@gmail.com
Subject: [Nagios-users] lun monitoring
Date: February 2, 2009 10:14:57 AM CST
--
Marc
--
This SF.net email
Marc,
In the spirit that each tool is supposed to fill one function and do
it well, I don't use Nagios for trending. Nagios is operational status
monitoring only.
I'd suggest you look at other tools for that level of performance. One
issue you will have is where will you query it? On certain
-Original Message-
From: Russell Adams [mailto:rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:38 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] lun monitoring
Marc,
In the spirit that each tool is supposed to fill one function and do
it well
James Pratt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Adams [mailto:rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:38 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] lun monitoring
Marc,
In the spirit that each tool is supposed to fill one
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:22:12PM -0700, Tom Ammon wrote:
I'll give a strong second to that - we use Cacti to graph 10,000+ data
sources, and it works great. It's a strong tool.
Tom
Tom,
I have progressed through MRTG, Cricket, and now Torrus in my search
for a good trending tool.
Russell Adams wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:22:12PM -0700, Tom Ammon wrote:
I'll give a strong second to that - we use Cacti to graph 10,000+ data
sources, and it works great. It's a strong tool.
Tom
Tom,
I have progressed through MRTG, Cricket, and now Torrus in my
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:10:45PM -0700, Tom Ammon wrote:
Russell,
Cacti is pretty SNMP-centric, but in our environment that is about all
we are using it for anyway. I'm no cacti expert, but to me, that's the
beauty of it - I don't really know the inner workings of cacti, and I am
not
14 matches
Mail list logo
