Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Randy Neals wrote:
A NANOG25 Info Message:
For those interested in the amount of bandwidth used at NANOG25.
Utilization of the Hotel Router can be viewed at:
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/
ATM
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/
ATM 2/0 is the OC-3c that connects the Hotel to the outside world.
cool!
any idea why the flat 750k? multicast beacon?
randy
I can't figure out why the weekly says max in 3051.7 kb/s, but daily says
999.3 kb/s max.
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/216.18.62.102_13.html
Time for my morning coffee I think...
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
div. of Doncaster Consulting Inc.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 04:29:55 -0700
Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nanogmrtg.grouptelecom.net/
ATM 2/0 is the OC-3c that connects the Hotel to the outside world.
cool!
any idea why the flat 750k? multicast beacon?
randy
Dear Randy;
They are indeed sourcing a NLANR
On Mon Jun 10, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Susan Harris wrote:
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
I appreciate that this was a mis-post, but it does raise the question
of whether the NANOG list is an open forum or not...
If the issue is with meeting messages being
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Mon Jun 10, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Susan Harris wrote:
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
I appreciate that this was a mis-post, but it does raise the question
of whether the NANOG list is an open forum or
Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Mon Jun 10, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Susan Harris wrote:
Randy, please talk with me before posting any more messages.
I appreciate that this was a mis-post, but it does raise the question
of whether the NANOG list is an open forum or not...
Considering the
I noticed my handle was hijacked by a company I used
to work for.
Naturally, I want it back since I went to use it and it's
incorrect.
My old handle, MH309, is now MH569.
Question 1: Did ARIN start expiring unused handles or did
something in the process of the hijack cause my handle to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Martin Hannigan wrote:
:Question 2: If an account is passworded, how were they able to
:take it? Does ARIN not ask for a copy of a license or other
:photo ID when making voice/fax based changes to POC's?
They used to ask for company letterhead, and there is no reason
on
Hello Martin,
I noticed my handle was hijacked by a company I used
to work for.
There is no match for MH309-ARIN in ARIN WHOIS.
Naturally, I want it back since I went to use it and it's
incorrect.
My old handle, MH309, is now MH569.
Since March of 2001 ARIN has removed many POC handles
Hi,
I can get a global address.
$ ping6 www.kame.net
Pinging kame220.kame.net [2001:200:0:4819:210:f3ff:fe03:4d0]
from 2001:468:1000:1:4094:f5ea:dce8:bca0 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2001:200:0:4819:210:f3ff:fe03:4d0: bytes=32 time=255ms
Reply from 2001:200:0:4819:210:f3ff:fe03:4d0:
IPv6 became operational around 10:50. Let us know if you continue to see
problems.
Thanks
Bob Stovall
MichNet Operations
Merit Network, Inc.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002,
I can get a global address.
i can now too!
it was the merit router.
randy
IPv6 became operational around 10:50. Let us know if you continue to see
problems.
i can see the dancing kame at http://www.kame.net
randy
Am I missing the importance of this somewhere or is this really not worth
100s of list members and the ARIN Director of Operations looking into it?
Steve
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Richard Jimmerson wrote:
Hello Martin,
I noticed my handle was hijacked by a company I used
to work for.
Hey there I am writing a paper for slamming ICANN a little more - how many
protocols are you folks actually routing today? 10, 20, and what are they?
Is there a standard list of protocols that all carriers support?
Todd
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:33:09AM -0700, todd glassey wrote:
Is there a standard list of protocols that all carriers support?
IP. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, todd glassey wrote:
Hey there I am writing a paper for slamming ICANN a little more - how many
protocols are you folks actually routing today? 10, 20, and what are they?
Is there a standard list of protocols that all carriers support?
I'm all for slamming ICANN, so
all concerned...
Alldas.org - the server that accumulated most web
defacements - send me an email in which they explained that they in a
desperate need of a new hosting-location. Without this they cannot
continue providing the net community and the network operators with this
service which
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Question 1: Did ARIN start expiring unused handles or did
something in the process of the hijack cause my handle to increment up
to 569, which I'm assuming was the next open number in the
in the scheme for 'MH'.
If they did start expiring unused
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
[snip]
I am not sure that the difference between 500 and 800 is
that significant.
A recent snapshot at oregon-ix showed 1500 prefixes with such munged
origins. That's quite a few more than just everyone announcing EPs as
from
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
AD Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
AD From: Andy Dills
AD How can you forget the king of all protocols, RIP? :)
RIP isn't an IP protocol. :-)
No, but UDP is, and RIP runs on top of UDP. Oh, so you mean there IS some
sort of solid
On Monday 10 June 2002 12:29 pm, Andy Dills wrote:
Note my quotes around the word routing. The only protocol that people
route is IP. Therefore, if you route all of the other protocols you
mentioned, you must inherently route all protocols L4 on up that run on
IP. Routing is done at L3.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Grant A. Kirkwood wrote:
Now that you've cleared that up, can someone enlighten me as to what this
has to do with slamming ICANN? I'm still not seeing the connection.
Yeah, no kidding! That has been bothering me all morning. (I've been
sitting here waiting for 30+ DS1
At 09:33 AM 12-06-02 -0700, todd glassey wrote:
Hey there I am writing a paper for slamming ICANN a little more - how many
protocols are you folks actually routing today? 10, 20, and what are they?
Is there a standard list of protocols that all carriers support?
Todd
Don't feed the trolls.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:02:48 -0400
Joe Provo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
[snip]
I am not sure that the difference between 500 and 800 is
that significant.
A recent snapshot at oregon-ix showed 1500 prefixes with such
26 matches
Mail list logo
