No one said squelch. I don't see squelching on the charter for NANOG.
Announce as loud as you want to. Be like other mailing lists and moderate
it. Send it to the vendor first. If the vendor doesn't help you, post it.
Just like they do with the abuse lists. This is operational.
At the end of August when I posted news about my interviews with Bill
Woodcock's views on synthetic path analysis and the economics of
peering and requested additional help from peering coordinators I
promised a brief report.
Response from Nanog was excellent. 16 additional folk joined
Hello Everyone,
Adding to what I think Dorian just hinted, traffic patterns in Asia are
changing. If you are in the US, expect future where with equal or paid
peering to places like China. In many cases, players in Asia are going to
ask the peering partner to pay to cross the ocean to get to
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:27:38PM -0700, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:
1:1 figure for people age 18 - 60. Add these indicators to the fact that
most of the Internet market dominating companies are the old PTTs. All these
PTT (control freaks) are now Telcos (out to maximize share holder
I'm not sure how much is supposed to be discussed about the paix la
project but I know we're going to turn up peering there, meeting with
our Paix sales person tomorrow. Still, Paix pao seems to have a lot of
asian carriers. Most of which were very very open to peering there.
On 29
Sep
Was wondering if anyone with clue from Cox is listening. My newly
assigned arin block, 69.1.64.0/20 doesn't seem to be making it in to your
filters even with the proper filed bbjects:).
Or maybe I'm missing something obvious.
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Scott Granados [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was wondering if anyone with clue from Cox is listening. My newly
assigned arin block, 69.1.64.0/20 doesn't seem to be making it in to your
filters even with the proper filed bbjects:).
Or maybe I'm
