My co-Bill, the estimable Mr. Manning wrote:
how/why is this proposed group distinct from the European
Operator Forum?
Mr. DEFAYET replied:
NDSoftware exist.
Mike CHENEY exist.
EuroNOG is neutral.
However, I'm not sure that actually constituted
Hence there is no space-efficient way of noting an authority
chain, other than entering every single IP address ever assigned, all in
one big data base.
Alas, that ain't feasible.
I beg to differ. Essentially, the collective databases of the address
registries are the data base that you
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 09:04:08 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What would be the point? Well, if my MTA receives a connection on port 25
I could look up the source IP address in the LDAP directory to identify
the owner. Since an LDAP directory can contain arbitrary information
related to its
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 04:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ARIN, RIPE and APNIC were to find some financial and political support,
then I believe that they could provide a global authoritative database of
ARIN has no lack of financial resources. From my perspective, the only
thing the ARIN
Michael,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 1:04:08 AM, you wrote:
MDrc What would be the point? Well, if my MTA receives a connection on port 25
MDrc I could look up the source IP address in the LDAP directory to identify
MDrc the owner. Since an LDAP directory can contain arbitrary information
MDrc
Does anyone on the list know of any ISPs that bill based on average
utilization, rather than some variation of 95th percentile?
Thanks
Lynn Bashaw
Director, Network Engineering
Yipes Enterprise Services
2000 S. Colorado Blvd.
Denver, CO 80222
At this exact moment we bill by average, but we're considering a switch to
95%, though lately I've gotten tired of fighting with customers when they
get a bandwidth bill, so we might just do away with measured bandwidth and
go with capped across the board.
--
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Lynn Bashaw wrote:
Does anyone on the list know of any ISPs that bill based on average
utilization, rather than some variation of 95th percentile?
Average is just a function of total and time, and time progresses linearly
with time, so average x some $ figure
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 10:44 am, Bruce Robertson wrote:
At this exact moment we bill by average, but we're considering a switch
to 95%, though lately I've gotten tired of fighting with customers when
they get a bandwidth bill, so we might just do away with measured
bandwidth and go
Does anyone on the list know of any ISPs that bill based on average
utilization, rather than some variation of 95th percentile?
We look at an mrtg graph and pick a nice spot on the graph that looks like
it is pushing enough bandwidth. We call this the eye-ball averaging
method. No complaints
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Koepp, Karsten wrote:
Volume usually totals in+out, whereas average does max(in,out)
divided by time intervals.
Well, not to be nit-picky, but that wouldn't strictly be averaging, then.
To get back to the question at hand, another scheme that I'm seeing more
I know that Peer 1 offers that. http://www.peer1.net. I've talked with
Bonnie Poirier, and she's very helpful. They offer both average use,
and 95th percentile.
Gabriel
Lynn Bashaw wrote:
Does anyone on the list know of any ISPs that bill based on average
utilization, rather than some
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:51:39PM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
Does anyone on the list know of any ISPs that bill based on average
utilization, rather than some variation of 95th percentile?
We look at an mrtg graph and pick a nice spot on the graph that looks like
it is pushing enough
Is there anyone else out there that seems to be reporting issues with
sprint in chicago?
In the last hour, i've had 1/2 dozen customers seeming to be calling with
issues across some stuff in chicago.
Trying to see if this is a sprint problem or a my problem.
Thanks!
-Eric
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:21:12PM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer to pick a random number, then consult my Magic 8-Ball with the
question Is this customer paying enough money?. If the answer is no, I
raise their bill by 10Mbit and try
Folks: in working on a project it has come to my attention that WorldCom
doesn't seem to have a DWDM network to speak of, and reportedly has spotty
DWDM coverage only in metro areas, a fact well hidden from company's
marketing literature that seems to avoid talking about speeds above oc-3.
Two
Does anyone on the list know of any ISPs that bill based on average
utilization, rather than some variation of 95th percentile?
Sure. As long as your math is correct it does not matter how do you
calculate your bill.
Alex
On Wednesday 5 February 2003, at 0 h 54,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NDSoftware exist.
...
I'm still waiting.
NDsoftware does not exist, at least as a company in France. It is *not*
registered in any French directory of companies (check it out:
http://www.societe.com/).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still waiting.
I'm not worried about the existance of a purported legal entity
that appears to be hosting a mailing list.
The question I ask, and am still waiting for an answer to is;
what are the differences (charter)
instead of spending our time and energy putting down fools, let us
try to be constructive. let's put our money where our mouths are.
i am soliciting presentations for the eof meeting in barcelona.
of particular interest a presentations on operationally oriented
research, heretofor
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
[lots of cool stuff here]
4) ND software is incorporated in Jersey, Monaco, Virgin Islands or the
Bahamas, not in France
I'd like the bahamas...
would be a great first meeting :)
--
Timo Mohre / Network Engineer / Tiscali Germany
Business Division /
Please reply
off-list, I will summarize if there is any interest.
I have a client that
is looking to use an inexpensive FastEthernet over DS3 bridge solution for one
of their clients. I quickly located two bridges/switches that do this, a)
RAD's RIC-T3/ETH and b) DS3SWITCH.COM's line.
Do
Maybe it's just me, but isn't there something odd about a DNS query
coming back with 78 entries for the same host? It sends back an UDP
packet that gets truncated and the DNS resolver reverts to TCP to get
the full list.
It seems to cause problems with Windows clients and/or Windows DNS
[apologies if you get two copies of this; the first one didn't seem to
go out for some reason]
The South Asian Network Operators Group (SANOG) held their first
meeting in Kathmandu, Nepal, a few weeks ago. By any standards the
meeting was a great success, and plans are already being made for
Maybe it's just me, but isn't there something odd about a DNS query
coming back with 78 entries for the same host? It sends back an UDP
packet that gets truncated and the DNS resolver reverts to TCP to get
the full list.
This is often used for server pools (as I'm guessing you know).
It
When I worked for NeoPets in the summer of 2000 they had a server farm about
that size. It was behind a NetFoundry (I think) Load Balancer at the time.
Perhaps their load balancer died and they had to get back up in a hurry.
Thanks,
Adam Tauvix Debus
Linux Certified Professional, Linux
Maybe it's just me, but isn't there something odd about a DNS query
coming back with 78 entries for the same host? It sends back an UDP
packet that gets truncated and the DNS resolver reverts to TCP to get
the full list.
This is often used for server pools (as I'm guessing you
27 matches
Mail list logo
