On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
so where is the authoritative web site
http://make-your-stinkin-windoze-system-safe.clue
to which we can point all our friends (and use to lock down
our kids' machines/sites)?
How could you have missed Dewie the Internet Security Turtle?
At least there is general consensus among pretty much
everyone - with the exception of a small number of cranks -
that IPv6 is
good.
Now I'm officially a crank because i fail to see why IPv6 is any better
than slightly perked up IPv4 - except for the bottom line of box vendors
who'll
(apologies if this appears twice)
From: Alex French [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ireland to regulate peering
In brief: New rules being put in place by the Irish telecoms regulator
will regulate IP peering between ISPs as if it were a voice interconnect.
I'd love to hear from any other
The Australian regulator is also examining Internet Interconnection.
See URL:http://www.accc.gov.au/telco/int_intercon_280403.doc.
Mark.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve
Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In brief: New rules being put in place by the Irish telecoms regulator
will regulate IP peering between ISPs as if it were a voice interconnect.
I'd love to hear from any other IPers who know if this is being proposed
anywhere
I commented on it once before on nanog actually...
Basicly LAME-DELEGATION.ORG is domain Network Solutions is using to move
old host records to. If they have a domain that is expiring and scheduled
for deletion and it has host records in .com or .net zones (so called
glue host records), then
One more note -
While this would be the third time I'v seen lame.lamedelegation.org
with ip 1.1.1.1 I really do not know for sure if NSI is responsible or not.
It may very well have been actual previous domain owner who has incorrectly
registered host to such an address. I'd need to lookup
warning: there are no IOS configuration commands in this thread. hit D now.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Donelan) writes:
However, in a country where VCR's still flash 12:00, users are not
going to read the manual or a web site or anything else. Despite
liking to pick on Microsoft, as soon as
the issue is them using reserved IP space..
Also, as of today, there are 11553 glue records in the .ORG
zone for lame delegation. Most have no more than 1 or 2 zones
associated with a specific glue record.
Seems like NSI is placing a LARGE amount of glue when not needed.
IPv6's major implementation problem is going to be apathy.
After all,
things are working fine at the moment, and who cares that
some day there
might be a big ip address crunch?
Nick
FYI:
http://dc.internet.com/news/article.php/2221821
June 13, 2003
Pentagon Commits to IPv6
By Roy
Hi, NANOGers!
] It worked out very quickly. I even have backup volunteers. Thank you all, a
] whole lot, from me, and from Rob, too. Oh, and for those that wondered, I
] should have specified, it's a lot (router and other fun things).
My hearty thanks as well! I really appreciate it. :) For
Roland Perry wrote:
In practice, regulators will only intervene at all, if one of the ISPs
has SMP. This is now almost impossible to achieve (tests of dominance
apply) especially with the diversity of transit providers. An SMP ISP
would have to dominate the *entire* market for wholesale transit
Well, since adding a simple option to IPv4 header would solve all address
space problems w/o any need to change core routing infrastructure (unlike
introduding v6) - I see little need to go for an entirely new L3 protocol.
--vadim
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Deepak Jain wrote:
1) Is IPV4
Vadim Antonov wrote:
Now I'm officially a crank because i fail to see why IPv6 is any better
than slightly perked up IPv4 - except for the bottom line of box vendors
who'll get to sell more of the new boxes doing essentially the same thing.
Then, let's draw a distinction between the generally
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Steve Bellovin wrote:
ComReg is planning to apply the principles of voice interconnect to all
network types; this means that operators of public communications
networks shall have a right, and when requested by other [operators], an
obligation to negotiate interconnection
On Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 02:29 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
2) Cable providers need to provide IPv6
Get Cablelabs to specify it in DOCSIS, only then will the cable guys do
it.
--
Joseph T. Klein
This space available. Ask for my resume.
PSTN: +1 414 961 1690 VoIP: +1 415 462 1534 Mobile: +1
I don't know what proof MessageLabs has, but they report that spammers
are breaking into home PCs of unsuspecting users to send junk mail.
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1141610
Spammers are increasingly hijacking home PCs to send junk mail, according
to MessageLabs. The managed email service
Hi, Sean.
] I don't know what proof MessageLabs has, but they report that spammers
] are breaking into home PCs of unsuspecting users to send junk mail.
What proof? Old proof. :) There are numerous bots, including the
now venerable SDbot, that have this capability. This doesn't count
the
RT Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:27:23 -0500 (CDT)
RT From: Rob Thomas
RT ] I don't know what proof MessageLabs has, but they report
RT ] that spammers are breaking into home PCs of unsuspecting
s/home/home, business, colo, and most any other/
RT ] users to send junk mail.
RT
RT What proof? Old
19 matches
Mail list logo
