http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23689-2003Jul7.html
Sean Gorman's professor called his dissertation tedious and
unimportant. Gorman didn't talk about it when he went on dates
because it was so boring they'd start staring up at the ceiling.
But since the Sept.
Eddy,
E.B. Dreger wrote:
You mean something like RouteScience [supposedly] does or ECN
influencing next hop?
Guilty as charged, of course :-)
Yes, I know, that would get ugly for transit ASes.
Well, the measurement itself isn't ugly - it's just a question of what
you choose to do with the
NANOG's Sean Gorman is in the news:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23689-2003Jul7.html
I would find GIS like the one described *very* usefull in finding transport
providers. If I could see who has what where, I would know who to go to for
quotes. As it stands, most of this
On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 12:24AM, Jack Bates wrote:
E.B. Dreger wrote:
SL Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 19:47:53 +0100
SL From: Simon Lockhart
SL As predominantly a content hoster, I'd love to know more about the
path
SL between my servers and the end user. Stuff like how much bandwidth
is
SL
i think that that is the point of the article - mr gorman is 'the one' ;)
he mapped something that those who put it together hoped was unmappable.
now it seems that they are blaming their incompetance on his skills.
could his work be used to better our 'critical' infrastructure? sure.
could
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:29:23AM -0400, Adam Kujawski wrote:
NANOG's Sean Gorman is in the news:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23689-2003Jul7.html
I would find GIS like the one described *very* usefull in finding transport
providers. If I could see who has what
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Adam Kujawski wrote:
Who, besides Sean, has maps like this? The state PUC? If
so, is that information available to the public? Do you
have to go thorugh a background check and/or sign an
NDA? Or is it only the providers themselves that have
the maps for this stuff?
It
Barn door, horse is already gone.
I'm willing to stipulate that Sean may be a GIS wizard, and has compiled a very
accurate listing of north american fiber routes. However, this is nothing new...
US Transatlantic cable landings (mirrored from John Young's cryptome.org):
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Joshua Sahala wrote:
i think that that is the point of the article - mr gorman is 'the one' ;)
he mapped something that those who put it together hoped was unmappable.
now it seems that they are blaming their incompetance on his skills.
could his work be used to better
Security by obscurity is not viable for the long-term.
Amen. This whole industry is littered with NDAs and such which only keep
honest people honest. There is _nothing_ stopping a malicious individual (or
group of acting collaboratively but independently) from getting hired to a
Hi,
Hopefully this isn't too far off, but besides shopping I need some input
on what it is I actually want...
The situation is that we'd need to take a DS3 backhaul for DSL in northern
Jersey somewhere, and find a cheap way to cross the Hudson and have it
land at Telehouse.
I know I can find a
Platform:
Cisco 7206VXR
SW:
Version 12.2(15)T2
router#sh run | b bgp
router bgp 65011
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
bgp confederation identifier 12345
bgp confederation peers 65001 65021
bgp deterministic-med
Matt Levine wrote:
Gomez seems to be trying to do this, with a monetary incentive:
http://www.porivo.com/peernetwork/jsp/index.jsp
Test is narrowed to webserver performance and is limited in the actual
test methods. From what I can tell, it says nothing about network
performance except in the
On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 3:59PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Matt Levine wrote:
Gomez seems to be trying to do this, with a monetary incentive:
http://www.porivo.com/peernetwork/jsp/index.jsp
Test is narrowed to webserver performance and is limited in the actual
test methods. From what I can tell,
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
The part that's striking to me, is that as usual, the folks in the
industry don't know when their facilities are co-mingled, in part becuase
that information simply isn't readily and easily available unless
someone's willing to go out collect the small little bits and connect
This question might be more suitable for inet-access, but it's down, so
I'm resending here:
Silly question:
If you have a customer who is doing their own primary DNS, but you are
doing their secondary DNS (on 2 of your name servers) for them, is it
better practice on your 2nd DNS server to
After you applied default-originate to peer-group, have you done soft-clear of your
bgp session?
It usually takes a little while for changes in config to propagate, unless you force
an update using soft clear...
-hc
--
Sincerely,
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
WWW:
As I recall, making changes to a peer-group outbound
policy will require all of the peer-group members to
reset (or at least the peer-group leader). Until that
reset happens, a soft clear to a follower session will
only re-send the output of the previously calcluated
policy.
I seem to remember
Thanks HC,
Two things. I was told this was not a topic for this list. Sorry about that.
Since I've already posted, I think I should post what the problem was.
Problem=I'm stupid. I wasn't looking in the right place for what I was advertising.
I ran:
router#sh ip bgp nei 10.99.200.75 adv
BGP
Well, the idea of peer-group is to.. as what the name sugests 'group' the peers into a
single and simple configuration.. Default route origination to a peer although may be
specific to a neighbor like in your situation, is still a configuration for peering
neighbor; hence making it possible to
Quoting Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The part that's striking to me, is that as usual, the folks in the
industry don't know when their facilities are co-mingled, in part becuase
that information simply isn't readily and easily available unless
someone's willing to go out collect the small
i personally point all of my 'secondary' servers at theirs for the
'primary' or master. having my box slave off another of my boxes that
is a slave is sort of like rip routing - dns by rumour anyone...
i prefer this method because then they are the 'only ones' who can
screw up the zones...(not
Adam Kujawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
Exactly. I think we all agree that this kind of information would be
usefull for a variety of reasons (locating available resources,
ensuring path redundancy, identifying critical points of failure,
etc). I think we all agree that this
Still doesn't answer why CISCO says you apply default orig to the peer, not
the peer group (which we've proven is backwards). It shouldn't be this way
since you may want to use the peer group as a template for multiple customers,
but they may not all want 0/0 sent to them. ALSO I didn't need
--On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 4:22 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This question might be more suitable for inet-access, but it's down, so
I'm resending here:
Silly question:
If you have a customer who is doing their own primary DNS, but you are
doing their secondary DNS (on
JS Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 18:14:59 -0400
JS From: Joshua Sahala
JS better yet, make it widely available and subject to a lot of scrutiny
JS and work to fix the problems (think openbsd - one remote compromise
JS in how many years...)
Turn off daemons. Hope the IP stack doesn't offer a
Hi,
Just wanted to thank everyone for their input. There are certainly more
people providing all sorts of non-traditional connectivity to choose
from. It seems some of the most cost-effective options land across the
river at 111 Pavonia or 24 Exchange Place. My last question would be,
what
At 5:57 PM -0400 7/8/03, Adam Kujawski wrote:
I like the idea of a clearinghouse where one can access the data
after a background check and a NDA.
Except for the fact that it expensive and time consuming to do
background checks. The FBI is still chewing through a backlog of
thousands of
28 matches
Mail list logo
