RKJ Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:43:50 -0300
RKJ From: Rubens Kuhl Jr.
RKJ Try booting into safe mode before running software to detect
RKJ or remove spyware; some of them fight to survive if they are
Also use msconfig to disable non-critical extras. Some of us
have manually ripped out ActiveX
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Reliance Infocomm is installing 80,000 km of fiber in India. I wonder if
they have any tiger stories.
Oh no. You find lions only in Kenya
Jeff
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Scott Savage wrote:
now because it is easy money and easy to get away with. I laugh every time
I see those Citibank identity theft ads on TV because, as funny as they
are, they speak the truth. Cell providers are the worst offenders of all.
Sydney, July 12, 2004: The
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Matt Larson wrote:
VeriSign Naming and Directory Services (VNDS) currently generates new
versions of the .com/.net zones files twice per day. VNDS is
scheduled to deploy on September 8, 2004 a new feature that will
enable VNDS to update the .com/.net zones more
coolwebsearch has become more and more sneaky..so bad that
development of cws shredder has been abandoned by its
developerEither serious lock down you ie(which with CWS is
not going to help) or use something other than ie.
Edward B. Dreger wrote:
RKJ Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 01:43:50 -0300
- Original Message -
From: William Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious
coolwebsearch has become more and more sneaky..so bad that
development of cws shredder has been abandoned by
- Original Message -
From: Michel Py [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious
Indeed. Lately, I have not been able to clean a very annoying piece of
crud named
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, William Warren wrote:
coolwebsearch has become more and more sneaky..so bad that
development of cws shredder has been abandoned by its
developerEither serious lock down you ie(which with CWS is
not going to help) or use something other than ie.
William Warren wrote:
coolwebsearch has become more and more sneaky..so
bad that development of cws shredder has been
abandoned by its developer
The smart computer does not exist (if it did, we would not have a job,
would we? ;-)
Either serious lock down you ie (which with CWS is
not
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:18:34PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
somebody, probably sean, mentioned scaling earlier in this thread.
coolwebsearch has become more and more sneaky.. so bad that
development of cws shredder has been abandoned by its developer..
...
the first time only about
Paul Vixie wrote:
or, to put it in terms you can all understand:
why does that provider's upstream still have bgp peers?
Maybe said upstream does not want to deal with TROs and legal issues?
CWS is not illegal as of today.
if you give people the means to hurt you, and they do it,
and you
This appears to have been dealt with at the browser level
in MS Security Bulletin MS03-011.
I have a hard time blaming MS for everything since in most cases
of these things they do react. How do they force the users to update?
Could they implement a switch that says no update, no working
On 7/12/04 12:33 PM, Michel Py [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Vixie wrote:
or, to put it in terms you can all understand:
why does that provider's upstream still have bgp peers?
Maybe said upstream does not want to deal with TROs and legal issues?
CWS is not illegal as of today.
CWS
On 7/12/04 12:33 PM, Michel Py
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some peering contracts specify that behaviors that endanger a
network or its
users allow for immediate disconnection. Its a bit of a stretch to invoke
this for a spyware site.
I think you could find a few experts that could
I think depeering is a bit over the top for this situation, but I
wouldn't blink at nullrouting the prefix in question at my cores... :)
I guess the big question is, is there anyone (other than those
profiting directly from CWS) that would complain if a provider were to
do such a thing...
-C
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
http://www.webhelper4u.com/CWS/cwsoriginial.html
These folks? Looks like it's all Cogent. Surely someone has contacted
Cogent about this?
I'm sure someone has.
The real question should be, does cogent care?
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Jeff Cole wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Reliance Infocomm is installing 80,000 km of fiber in India. I wonder if
they have any tiger stories.
Oh no. You find lions only in Kenya
Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh my!
Err wait, which way to OZ again?
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:16:06AM -0400, Jeff Cole wrote:
Reliance Infocomm is installing 80,000 km of fiber in India. I wonder if
they have any tiger stories.
Oh no. You find lions only in Kenya
This is sooo way OT, but given the subject line...
There is still a remnant population of
** Reply to message from Tom (UnitedLayer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Jeff Cole wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Reliance Infocomm is installing 80,000 km of fiber in India. I wonder if
they have any tiger stories.
Oh no. You find
On Jul 12, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Christopher Woodfield wrote:
I think depeering is a bit over the top for this situation, but I
wouldn't blink at nullrouting the prefix in question at my cores... :)
I guess the big question is, is there anyone (other than those
profiting directly from CWS) that
I think depeering is a bit over the top for this situation, ...
if their customer was sucking blood from your customer, and if your peer
was taking a cut of the proceeds, would the issues be any clearer?
I guess the big question is, is there anyone (other than those profiting
directly from
- Original Message -
From: Michel Py [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 12:41 AM
Subject: RE: Spyware becomes increasingly malicious
Gregh wrote:
Are you honestly serious? I came up against it for
the first time only
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 12 14:51:58 2004
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom (UnitedLayer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'nanog list' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Critters
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Jeff Cole wrote:
Marshall Eubanks
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Jeff Cole wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Reliance Infocomm is installing 80,000 km of fiber in India. I wonder if
they have any tiger stories.
Oh no. You find lions only in Kenya
Lions and Tigers and Bears, oh
not all the variants are that easy..how about doing a google on
coolwebsearch..scumware.com has a good writeup as well as
spywareinfo.com...the newer variants are not that easy
Gregh wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michel Py [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
David Bell, Chief Executive of the ABA, said: Online banking systems
are
secure and have not been hacked.
Oh, yeah? This guy is on dope if he actually believes that...
While I will grant that online banking systems are among (maybe
amongst?) the most secure that we deal with, to say that
William Warren wrote:
not all the variants are that easy..how about doing a google on
coolwebsearch..scumware.com has a good writeup as well as
spywareinfo.com...the newer variants are not that easy
I second that. The version I saw required a third party
registry editor and booting up
27 matches
Mail list logo
