Edward,
DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
EBD When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to make
EBD significant improvents that are drop-in.
On the theory
PS. I am excited - Vixie as a co-conspirator... Vixie, you can be proud -:).
i'm not, though. not proud, and not a co-conspirator. this whole thing
makes me want to puke. the worst thing is, the people i know inside
verisign seem to wish i wouldn't take it so personally. but if their
stock
DC Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:08:12 -0700
DC From: Dave Crocker
DC DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DC DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DC DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
DC EBD When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:00:56 -, Edward B. Dreger said:
Without new code/libs to parse the TXT RR, SPF doesn't work. As
long as new code is being written, it seems logical to have
another RRTYPE assigned -- that's one less thing to change later.
On the other hand, having to deploy a new
Without new code/libs to parse the TXT RR, SPF doesn't work. ...
that could be one of the reasons why, two years before the advent of SPF,
i wrote up and circulated jim miller's idea from 1998. if you want to
know about the paths not taken, see http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt.
On the
Regarding both Paul's message below and Simon Walter's earlier message on
this topic...
Simon Walters scribed:
I'm slightly concerned that the authors think web traffic is the big
source of DNS, they may well be right (especially given one of the
authors is talking about his own network),
