William Allen Simpson wrote:
Please, the interim-moderators should moderate, and the
bylaws drafters should draft, and they should be separate.
It's the usual difference between the Chair and the Editor
(or Raporteur, or Recording Secretary).
I introduced this important division to the IETF
It appears that they do not share your view, by reading nanog-futures.
The new mailing list administration has already demonstrated that it had
zero credibility:
Yesterday, I posted something that displeased Martin Hanningan and was
told that I needed his permission. As I was browsing the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Michel Py
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 4:20 PM
To: William Allen Simpson; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: NANOG Changes
William Allen Simpson wrote:
Please, the interim-moderators should
Hi Gadi,
Gadi Evron wrote:
Please read the below text in full, if you are going to read
any of it. I use a lot of cynicism to get my point across.
Same here. Besides cynicism, I also use (and possibly abuse) sarcasm.
I haven't been involved with the NANOG reform initiative,
and haven't
FYI.
I am forwarding this to nanog because there is a request for folks willing to
do field testing.
d/
--- Original Message ---
From: Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Sent: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:18:11 +0900
Subject: Revised CSV-Intro and CSV-CSA specifications
