Too much noice on too small problem. The only use of this - BOT wars in IRC
world (mopre likely, with a very low success rate).
- Original Message -
From: Alex Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hannigan, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu;
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 23:42 -0300, Doug Barton wrote:
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv4 /8 block to AfriNIC:
41/8 AfriNIC
Would you (read: IANA) also be so kind and give them a nice chunk out
of:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 23:42 -0300, Doug Barton wrote:
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv4 /8 block to AfriNIC:
41/8 AfriNIC
Would you (read: IANA) also be so kind and give them a nice chunk out
of:
...and hilarity ensued. Not.
http://www.icannwatch.org/articles/05/04/11/132201.shtml
Sigh. I am certainly not happy to see this and I must confess dismay
that the subject rears its ugly head. My life has been better since
i stopped paying attention to these people hoping that they
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:14:05AM +0200,
Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 49 lines which said:
Btw, is there going to be an LACNIC-alike system for transfering
RIPE/ARIN resources to AfriNIC?
AFAIK, all inetnums belonging to Africa in the RIPE-NCC database have
already
BetaNews:
New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers
http://www.betanews.com/article/New_Outage_Hits_Comcast_Subscribers/1113367699
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:18:41 +0530
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/05, Matthew Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. After given a numeric SMTP error response code between 500 and 599
(also known as a permanent non-delivery response), the sender
must
not
Could someone from Comcast please email me off list.
Ross Hosman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought you were doing these on a blog now
On 4/12/2005 8:25 PM, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
...and hilarity ensued. Not.
http://www.icannwatch.org/articles/05/04/11/132201.shtml
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL
I am.
- ferg
-- Eric A. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought you were doing these on a blog now
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
This is all a tempest in a teapot and it is all caused by a poor choice of
headings and seems to be a knee jerk reaction to several possible ways in
which the heading can be misunderstood.
Auerbach complains about ICANN.
He challenges process rather than outcomes.
He even cites the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Gordon Cook
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:22 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP
Allocation
...and hilarity ensued. Not.
Why is it anyone thinks this sort of icann-bashing-as-usual, is somehow
significant and worthy of burdening nanog?
we should return to fergie's endless news items?
procmail is your friend
randy
During the first outage this week I used Bluetooth DUN via my Treo to
dial-up from home and check Comcast's customer support web page. There was
a note on the network health page stating that Internet access was down
for all cable modem subscribers.
Uh no, it wasn't down - just their DNS was
Dear Comcast,
Let me inform you of an exciting new concept... Anycast DNS... It is
not difficult... Get with the freaking program...
Peter
On Apr 13, 2005, at 7:15 AM, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
BetaNews:
New Outage Hits Comcast Subscribers
On Wednesday April 13 2005 08:04, Ross Hosman wrote:
Could someone from Comcast please email me off list.
Ross Hosman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nanog.org/email.html
Follow directions..
--
Scott Grayban
Security/Abuse Engineer
FCT Enterprises -- www.fctsupport.com
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Peter John Hill wrote:
Let me inform you of an exciting new concept... Anycast DNS... It is not
difficult... Get with the freaking program...
I attempted to get DNS deployed under anycast when I worked there. As you
can see, I don't work there any more. Draw your own
On 4/13/2005 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ICANN is not perfect but it is hard to see anything
wrong with this particular action.
what's got to be wrong about it? ICANNwatch is the unelected opposition
party to ICANN's unelected majority party. Whatever ICANN does, ICANNwatch
finds
Thank you for that information. I can leave 41/8 in my router bogon list
and hopefully eliminate the Nigerian 419 problem somewhat.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 21:42
Subject: New IANA IPv4 allocation to
On 4/13/05, John Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for that information. I can leave 41/8 in my router bogon list
and hopefully eliminate the Nigerian 419 problem somewhat.
Personally, I believe we should give them the chance to fail before we
cut them off from the rest of the
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:24:13 PDT, Dave Crocker said:
(citing out of order to make a point...)
The input turns out to be markedly minimal, where he comprises 25% of it.
Whether Karl is in fact right or a raving net.loon, there is indeed something
very
wrong with the process if he's 25% of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yo Steve!
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Steve Meuse wrote:
Personally, I believe we should give them the chance to fail before we
cut them off from the rest of the world. I don't think the majority of
419 email comes from addresses actually sourced in
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv4 /8 block to AfriNIC:
41/8 AfriNIC
To those suggesting a block of 41/8 to stop the Nigerian 419 problem or
any other percieved problem:
C'mon Africa != Nigeria. It's an entire friggin' continent with 53 other
Thanks for the clarification. I agree, it is very unusual to transfer a
trademark without transferring the product it identifies. I didn't know it
was impossible.
Since you are an expert on the subject, I would like to have your opinion
regarding how ISC can claim a trademark on BIND, assuming
I'd prefer it if you gave an opinion on how this was
operationally relevant?
Thanks for the clarification. I agree, it is very unusual to
transfer a trademark without transferring the product it
identifies. I didn't know it was impossible.
Since you are an expert on the subject, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether Karl is in fact right or a raving net.loon, there is indeed something
very
wrong with the process if he's 25% of the input.
It may be useful to keep in mind that this is the tail end of a long process
that we're talking about here. There was already a lot of
You do know that I was joking, don't you??
Sorry, I didn't know that NANOG has a humor filter on it.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 16:26
Subject: Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)
This is
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, John Palmer wrote:
: To those suggesting a block of 41/8 to stop the Nigerian 419 problem or
: any other percieved problem:
: You do know that I was joking, don't you??
: Sorry, I didn't know that NANOG has a humor filter on it.
You weren't the only one suggesting it
Not so. The idea of an opposition party suggests the editors of ICW have
some desire to be in control. Not at all.
Further, we run a slash server. Most of the content is contributed. We
don't have to go hunt for it.
If ICANN ran decent discussion boards, it would put us out o business.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:38:44 UTC Steve Meuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/05, John Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for that information. I can leave 41/8 in my router bogon
list and hopefully eliminate the Nigerian 419 problem somewhat.
Personally, I believe we should give
on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:44PM -0600, Steve Meuse wrote:
On 4/13/05, John Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for that information. I can leave 41/8 in my router bogon list
and hopefully eliminate the Nigerian 419 problem somewhat.
Personally, I believe we should give them
The largest part (90%) does originate in Nigeria. The remainder comes
from countries adjacent to Nigeria such as Togo, Senegal, etc (~6%) or
from the Netherlands (~4%)
would love to see the cite for this, please
randy
On 4/13/05, Richard Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The largest part (90%) does originate in Nigeria. The remainder comes
from countries adjacent to Nigeria such as Togo, Senegal, etc (~6%) or
from the Netherlands (~4%)
So we should spank the rest of the *continent* for one countries issues?
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
The largest part (90%) does originate in Nigeria. The remainder comes
from countries adjacent to Nigeria such as Togo, Senegal, etc (~6%) or
from the Netherlands (~4%)
would love to see the cite for this, please
randy
I have a collected archive of
For your perusal:
Fed Panel Approves Tyco's Sale of Undersea Cable To India's Tata
Microsoft Worm Cleaner Goes Rootkit Hunting
Standards and specs: Naturally occurring standards
Senators pledge action on data brokers
Anti-spyware group collapses
Florida Wins First Injunction Against
On 4/13/05, Ross Hosman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone from Comcast please email me off list.
Ross Hosman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have an AS, get yourself an inoc-dba phone. Easiest way to
contact network operators that I know of.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I have one, and its cool. However the time I *really* needed it was
because I couldn't reach a particular AS... and of course neither could
my INOC-DBA phone (sigh...).
-Jeff
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 23:12, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 4/13/05, Ross Hosman [EMAIL
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
I have one, and its cool. However the time I *really* needed it was
because I couldn't reach a particular AS... and of course neither could
my INOC-DBA phone (sigh...).
There are several ways around that... Probably the
Cisco's web site has a Miercom report
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/products/ps5854/c1244/cdccont_0900aecd8017382b.pdf
that tested a bidirectional UDP flow between two 10/100 ports, with
big IP packets,
firewall and NAT running and logging turned on, and they got 130 Mbps.
39 matches
Mail list logo
