On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 01:10 +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
as part of our AS-set stuffing experiments (announced, including links
to in-depth information, in [1]), we will be announcing unusually large
AS-sets tomorrow, Thursday 16 June.
Hi,
due to unforeseen
June 15th: Lorenzo gives us 24 hours notice that he is going to be using
our (a very general our here, meaning all Internet operators) network for
performing his experiments on. (oh, and points out that hes been doing the
same with IPv6 since last year, just unannounced, but thats okay
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Btw, if you postponed the 'experiment', how come I did pick up this one:
84.205.73.0/24 12654 12654
{1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
There's no reason why one couldn't build a comparable model for mail,
with the SMTP speciality service provider offering SMTP transit to a
base of trusted customers. This comparatively small number of SMTP
speciality provider would then maintain good relations (peerings) with
the
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Btw, if you postponed the 'experiment', how come I did pick up this one:
84.205.73.0/24 12654 12654
{1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
I am not sure any level of security would make me feel good about
passing
my emails through a 'peering .. core' of SMTP relays.
However, if we do go in this direction, I plan on firing up my old
copies
of BinkleyTerm. FIDO and NetMail may be a good place to start :)
Back in the day,
On 19/06/05, Alexei Roudnev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I send it when I am on DSL with EthLink
(and thru Earthlink SMTP). And it is 100% valid situation.
Sure is - which is one reason why spf just is not going to work for you
CSV on the other hand makes no
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:33 +0200, MarcoH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Btw, if you postponed the 'experiment', how come I did pick up this one:
84.205.73.0/24 12654 12654
Back in the day, there were users of Fido technology networks
who were concerned with email privacy. They applied a technology
called PGP to secure the contents of their messages.
Folks,
We are talking about changing an existing system -- one with an installed base
of perhaps 1B users,
We apologize for duplicates.
LACNIC received new IPv4 address blocks from IANA on last June 17th,
and will start to make allocation from these new blocks in near
future.
The IP blocks allocated are the following:
189/8 and 190/8
We recommend the network administrators to revise and to adjust
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Daniel Golding
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:30 PM
To: Randy Bush; Betty Burke
Cc: nanog@merit.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
Randy,
People's employers
It shouldn't be complicated. I think members are looking
for Operator experience. I don't think it's too hard to make that
easily discernable as long as it's fair.
Different people will look for different things.
That's why we're having an election, instead of just having Merit
appoint the
Hannigan, Martin wrote:
It shouldn't be complicated. I think members are looking
for Operator experience. I don't think it's too hard to make that
easily discernable as long as it's fair.
Members aren't looking for Operator experience (sic). Members are
looking for talks that do not suck.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:09:37PM -0400, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
I agree, this is an imperfect mechanism, but there was a desire
to get the process going well in advance of the next meeting.
Otherwise we would have to wait a few extra months. Also, note
that not all voters will be at
Members aren't looking for Operator experience (sic). Members are
looking for talks that do not suck.
(sic) is a matter of interpretation, and, you already said the talks
suck. The PC said they don't get enough talks. Some of the talks are
going to be filler.
Put more constructively,
15 matches
Mail list logo
