Is ICANN actually going to come up with a set of guidelines ?
ICANN? No. The SSAC who wrote the report and are a bunch of people
who actually have some clues about running networks? Definitely.
I don't know if it is the repeated ICANN can't be trusted / is corrupt
messaging, or the sensitivity of the .NET rebid (aka VGRS deregulation)
that got the prompt action --
It's more that ICANN has figured out that registrars are where all
their revenue comes from, and if they dragged their feet
I don't know if it is the repeated ICANN can't be trusted / is corrupt
messaging, or the sensitivity of the .NET rebid (aka VGRS deregulation)
that got the prompt action --
It's more that ICANN has figured out that registrars are where all
their revenue comes from, and if they dragged
Forwarded Message from Neil Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
...sez Vint...due to the prevalence of phishing:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8586332/
- ferg
Paul,
I'm not registered as a poster on the Nanog list, so I thought I'd let
you know that this problem is
If that is a general question, I'd say the answer is no. There does not
seem to be a great deal of interest in Phoenix as a peering location.
Years ago, MPIX was founded and located in the Genuity/GTE facility in
Phoenix, but that closed quite some time ago. If there is a small
REP or IX in
After extensive analysis and discussion, the Mozilla community and Opera
have already produced a fix for this, based on only displaying Unicode
IDN labels where the registry publishes and enforces well-defined
anti-homograph policies, and displaying the Punycode equivalent
1. It's
