I'd second the notion on the PC Weasel. I know the guy who
designed them (hpeyerl), and they were designed from the
start to be indistinguishable to the OS from textmode VGA
cards and PS2 keyboards. The redraw algorithm is smart,
along the lines of screen -- some serial BIOS support
Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] I understand that the carriers have gotten together and made
sure that the various 911/112/999 emergency services numbers work
world-wide, so that if you're an American in Europe, you can still
call 911 and have that work as expected.
Given that
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:20:07 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Corlett) wrote:
Given that there are UK telephone numbers starting 911
When I worked with Oftel on the design of the new UK numbering schemes,
one of my strongest recommendations was for certain prefixes, including
911, to be
Peter Corlett wrote:
Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] I understand that the carriers have gotten together and made
sure that the various 911/112/999 emergency services numbers work
world-wide, so that if you're an American in Europe, you can still
call 911 and have that work as
On 20 Jul 2005, at 21:46, Brad Knowles wrote:
In the case of regular cell phones, if you are roaming on a network
in a foreign country, or you have rented a local phone, I understand
that the carriers have gotten together and made sure that the various
911/112/999 emergency services
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8655541/
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
On 07/21/2005 09:32 AM, Joe Abley allegedly wrote:
On 20 Jul 2005, at 21:46, Brad Knowles wrote:
In the case of regular cell phones, if you are roaming on a
network in a foreign country, or you have rented a local phone, I
understand that the carriers have gotten together and made
More detail here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4703777.stm
- Original Message -
From: Fergie (Paul Ferguson) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:57 am
Subject: More bombings in London
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8655541/
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul
Scott W Brim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 07/21/2005 09:32 AM, Joe Abley allegedly wrote:
On 20 Jul 2005, at 21:46, Brad Knowles wrote:
In the case of regular cell phones, if you are roaming on a
network in a foreign country, or you have rented a local phone, I
understand that the
Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Corlett wrote:
[...]
AFAIAA, Magrathea don't offer access to 112/999, but this is no
great loss given that mobile phones are cheap, ubiqitous, and work
pretty much everywhere in the UK. Even hermits have them :)
Given the recent London
Via the BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4704359.stm
[snip]
Mobile phone networks are bearing the weight of calls once more as news of four
blasts across London spreads.
Vodafone, the largest network, told the BBC News website that it had seen
significantly higher call volumes
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:32:09PM -0700, Rick Wesson wrote:
Folks,
I've developed a tool to pull together a bunch of information from
DNSRBLs and mix it with a BGP feed, the result is that upon request I
can generate a report of all the compromised hosts on your network as
seen by
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:21:36 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Corlett) wrote:
112/999 takes priority over regular calls. There doesn't seem to be
any evidence that calls to 999 from mobiles were any more prone to
failure than those from landlines.
112 takes priority at all levels. 999
Even for fixed, US, residential VoIP, there's another problem: service
availability. With cell phones, people expect dropped calls and sketchy
service, and understand misrouted calls to local operators/emergency
services. It's part of the deal.
But a land line? If I pick up an analog phone
On 7/21/05, Joseph S D Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:32:09PM -0700, Rick Wesson wrote:
Folks,
I've developed a tool to pull together a bunch of information from
DNSRBLs and mix it with a BGP feed, the result is that upon request I
can generate a report of
On 21 Jul 2005, at 12:02, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
Unless you have personally verified each entry, you would do well to
add
a disclaimer that DNSRBLs are not 100% reliable, eh?
Unless I'm mistaken (and my first report hasn't arrived yet, so maybe I
am) this is more of a heads up! the
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:31:13PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
...
Unless I'm mistaken (and my first report hasn't arrived yet, so maybe I
am) this is more of a heads up! the following addresses within your
network are listed on DNSBLs than anything else.
I can't see why you'd add a
On Jul 21, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:31:13PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
...
Unless I'm mistaken (and my first report hasn't arrived yet, so maybe
I
am) this is more of a heads up! the following addresses within your
network are listed on DNSBLs than
--- Joseph S D Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you have personally verified each entry, you would do well to add
a disclaimer that DNSRBLs are not 100% reliable, eh?
And what on the net is? :)
Iâm all for people dealing with âbadly managedâ boxes at various levels.
While some
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:48:27PM -0400, John Payne wrote:
...
I don't see why the reliability/reputation of a dnsbl changes the
trueness
of this host is listed in this dnsbl.
That is, of course, all that the report says [per the announcement].
But who knows how it might be interpreted,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:10:27AM -0700, Charles Cala wrote:
...
More tools and information are a good thing,
but how/where you chose to use a sawzall is up to you.
http://www.milwaukeetool.com/us/en/news.nsf/vwFeaturedProducts/4CBA61C6E299F75D86256FEB0072211D?OpenDocument
Yes, but I
I've come across a few requests for reports with over 10,000 issues. for
the net ops folks that might have huge blocks with many issues -- what
is the most relivant information? Also, how does one go about solving a
large set of issues across a huge address space?
Basickly I'm wondering if
All:
As of 9:14am today:
191 people have voted
915 votes cast
Voting is proceeding, but at a slow pace, getting just a trickle the past
few days. If you are eligible and have not voted, please take advantage
of this opportunity. A reminder, voting ends at midnight EST on Monday,
July
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Rick Wesson
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 7:32 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: compromized host list available
Folks,
I've developed a tool to pull together a bunch of information from
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
I've developed a tool to pull together a bunch of information from
DNSRBLs and mix it with a BGP feed, the result is that upon request I
can generate a report of all the compromised hosts on your network as
seen by various DNSRBLs.
What
Todd Vierling wrote:
Certainly, I'd *love* to see a neatly cross referenced list for a few
unnamed cesspools who refuse to police their networks, in order to ostracize
them for it in public, but that's not the purpose of these reports
a personal flaw of mine, is that I tend in this
The announcement didn't state the intended use - which, given the
ingenuity of some, is most reasonable. But there are those who will
believe whatever they read, as long as it's in a report, and especially
if the report is automatically generated. Must be true, then, eh? A
report, eh?
Austin McKinley wrote:
But a land line? If I pick up an analog phone anywhere, I expect a dial
tone, and local calling. If I don't have access to emergency services
after a blackout/natural disaster that knocks cell towers down (think
hurricane season in Florida last year) then you'd never
Rick,
Similar to what I expressed already in email directly to you, data
without timestamp of when a specific IP address was found to be an
offender is nearly worthless for action, and only interesting as
statistical chatter.. Except where you perhaps have business customers
(and the occasional
So, I guess, I wonder -- with the deficiencies indicated
above -- what operational use such a list would really have
in the end. ;-) Other than yet another interesting metric of
just how bad things are out there(TM).
And, I should say, that in the end.. The best use might be aggregate
We're being hit up by MCI's billing fraud again. You'd think after the
multiple settlements, the $4 billion accounting fraud and Ebbers'
25 year prison sentence that MCI would have learned something, but
apparently not.
Anyone have a definitive method of dealing with these clowns? Any contacts
Crist Clark wrote:
Gratuitous-Plug=Employer
If you really want high reliability during and after a natural disaster,
satellite phones are probably your best option.
That's who I thought you worked for, but the only satellite phone provider
whose name I consistently remember is Iridium
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:31:53PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
We're being hit up by MCI's billing fraud again. You'd think after the
multiple settlements, the $4 billion accounting fraud and Ebbers'
25 year prison sentence that MCI would have learned something, but
apparently not.
Anyone
Austin McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Well, OK, so I'm being UK-centric, but the same problems apply.]
What's the opex of a single residential phone line? How much does it
cost to have a live copper pair, and how much does it cost to
connect said copper to the PSTN?
If BT is to be
We're being hit up by MCI's billing fraud again.
mci's billing problems are gross ineptitude, not fraud. and just
about every major (and many minor) telco has the same mess.
have your documentation in order and talk to your account rep.
the sky is not falling.
randy
Hello
I am looking at aquiring some switches to upgrade a large web site front and
backend switching network.
I am looking at cisco and HP switches at the moment and would like to hear
peoples opinions on them or recommendations for any others.
Some of the switches I am looking at are
Bill Nussey writes on CircleID:
[snip]
At The Email Authentication Implementation Summit in New York City last week,
several major ISPs surprised attendees with their announcement that they are
jointly backing a single authentication standard.
Yahoo!, Cisco, EarthLink, AOL, and Microsoft
Interesting.
About 1 year ago (early 2004), in a one month period, we had every
single MCI outstanding billing dispute resolved -- some even that were
over 4 years old. It seemed to me that the dispute resolution people
actually gave a hoot all of a sudden. And, some inside information I
On 22/07/05, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Nussey writes on CircleID:
[snip]
How do you say that was an email authentication for dummies session
without actually saying so?
Here's how (my followup on circleid)
By Suresh Ramasubramanian | Posted on Jul 21, 2005 @ 7:08
I am looking at aquiring some switches to upgrade a large web site front
and
backend switching network.
I am looking at cisco and HP switches at the moment and would like to
hear
peoples opinions on them or recommendations for any others.
We've been using Cisco
At The Email Authentication Implementation Summit in New York City last week,
several major ISPs surprised attendees with their announcement that they are
jointly backing a single authentication standard.
More details are at http://mipassoc/mass.
Participation by the ops community is
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:12:28 -0700
From: Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: CircleID: News from the E-mail Authentication Summit in NYC
X-Songbird-SpamCheck:
At The Email Authentication Implementation Summit in New York City last
week,
42 matches
Mail list logo
