On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
If you're near real time, you have lots of options actually. And I
would contend that p2p can be efficient for broadcast distribution
actually. There already are several startups doing exactly that for
large scalability.
Yep. Lots of startups have
The key signing will be on Monday at 3pm in the State room. If you
can't make it, feel free to submit keys as there will be a follow-up session
during the Wednesday morning break.
So get those keys in and I'll see you in Dallas!
--msa
-snip-
Stickers
On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
If you're near real time, you have lots of options actually. And I
would contend that p2p can be efficient for broadcast distribution
actually. There already are several startups doing exactly that
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one in
Kuwait as yet?
There is one in Pakistan, and maybe Dubai. I would address this
question to the SANOG list.
Regards
Marshall
On Feb 7, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one
in Kuwait as yet?
I think the main challenge in making this type of media distribution a
reality
is not the technology, we mostly know how to make it work.
The real challenge is the content owners' willingness to make the
content
available while preserving their IP rights.
-Original Message-
From:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Wil Schultz wrote:
Incidentally (because I ask everyone this), what's your flow volume (flows
per second)?
Cannot get ahold of the machine until tomorrow. I did a 'wc' on 4 devices for
5 minutes and it comes out to just under 3600, about 11-12 per second...
Erm,
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Bill Nash wrote:
Erm, that seems kind of low. Flow volume for two 6509s in what I consider
a small to medium size hosting site, with about 6+ gigs of differentiated
egress generates more than 8 to 9 *thousand* flows per second, and that's
after discard incomplete tcp
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one in
Kuwait as yet?
ISOC-IL is running the IIX for Israel.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
Are you sure you're getting everything?
he did previously state he was only using about 120mbps... and it'd depend
upon his/your sample rates as well...
Missed that part. Even so, 120mbps of actual usage, I would expect to see
a higher
On 2/7/06, Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one in
Kuwait as yet?
http://www.emix.net.ae/
it's flash heavy fyi
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one in
Kuwait as yet?
Yes, KIX. Note, there's CIX and CRIX. If you are trying to
reach African users, there's also KIX ala Kenya.
-M
--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation
I'm talking to an ISP in eastern Nebraska who has a DS3 to Sprint.
They've got a peer they tie to with private fiber. That peer has a DS3
from ATT. Both normally see 20ms response times on pings from their
border routers to the carrier router. Since last Thursday the Sprint
connected
[warning NOT operationally relevant, just need to clarify]
re
http://news.yahoo.com/photos/ss/events/ts/122805nsaspying/im:/060125/480/dcev10301252131;_ylt=Ag51RnYLYcMpHtd_Cq9ZJCNiWscF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3dmhrOGVvBHNlYwNzc20-
thanx to those who forwarded this, it was news to us. note that the
On 7-Feb-2006, at 11:27, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 2/7/06, Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one in
Kuwait as yet?
http://www.emix.net.ae/
it's flash heavy fyi
Note that EMIX is a transit service, not really peering.
On 7-Feb-2006, at 11:54, Martin Hannigan wrote:
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one
in Kuwait as yet?
Yes, KIX. Note, there's CIX and CRIX. If you are trying to
reach African users, there's also KIX ala Kenya.
The exchange point in Nairobi is called KIXP,
Got my hands on the box today, looks like it is Skype. Below is a
support article from their site:
http://support.skype.com/index.php?_a=knowledgebase_j=questiondetails_i=148
* Randy Bush:
so, anyone working on the majordomo and mailman hacks for goodmail?
i am sorry, but you can not subscribe to this list from an aol.com
address. don't ask us to explain, ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or am i missing something here? clue-bat if so, please.
I don't expect the existing
At 04:11 PM 2/7/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 7-Feb-2006, at 11:54, Martin Hannigan wrote:
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one
in Kuwait as yet?
Yes, KIX. Note, there's CIX and CRIX. If you are trying to
reach African users, there's also KIX ala Kenya.
The
A look at Telegeography's bandwidth maps suggest that the African routes are
predominantly coastal.
http://www.afridigital.net/downloads/DFIDinfrastructurerep.doc
adds some more detail.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
Abley
--On February 7, 2006 7:29:56 AM -0800 Majdi S. Abbas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PGP on a Mac:
I assume the procedure is similar to the one for Windows,
but cannot confirm this. Hopefully it's easy enough to figure
out.
Depends on what you're
Apparently not, this looks more like it:
Time window: Feb 05 2006 22:56:57 - Feb 07 2006 16:58:10
Flows analysed: 202925 matched: 202925, Bytes read: 10028280
Sys: 0.500s flows/second: 405167.7 Wall: 1.293s flows/second: 156923.1
Just a few more than 11
-Wil
I think some of the people here may want to read this new RFC:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4367.txt
RFC 4367
Title: What\'s in a Name: False
Assumptions about DNS Names
Author: J. Rosenberg, Ed.,
IAB
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, william(at)elan.net wrote:
I think some of the people here may want to read this new RFC:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4367.txt
Small comment - its probably not the people here that need to read it but
people at http://www.icann.org
But then again it doesnt
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Randy Bush wrote:
I'm interested in responses to this ... MPLS is still a four letter word
.. :)
http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2006-02/converged.html
here's me hiding this article from 'management' who are again chasing the
'converged' network :( In some cases it
http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2006-02/converged.html
here's me hiding this article from 'management' who are again
chasing the 'converged' network :( In some cases it appears
convergence makes some sense, I think often though (in my very
humble experience) it's more of a buzzword-compliance
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
I would not be surprised if the toplogical centre of today's African
Internet turned out to be the LINX.
Yep, with 111 8th close behind.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Frank Bulk wrote:
A look at Telegeography's bandwidth maps suggest that
Martin Hannigan wrote:
My answer, in short, was to say that I see it as more of an enterprise
play because it's a managed service and the hardest part of
provisioning is typically the order cycle.
If you are an ISP, you are theoretically multi homed by definition
and your providers are going
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Nick Feamster wrote:
As an aside, another question occurred to me about delaying unusual
announcements. Boeing Connexion offers another example of unorthodox
prefix announcements. Wouldn't the tactic of delaying unusual
announcements would cause problems for this
At 10:30 PM 2/7/2006, Bill Woodcock wrote:
[ SNIP ]
Anyway, back to the conversation at hand:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
Middle Eastern Exchange Points
I know of a Cairo IXP, and possibly one in the UAE. Is there one in
Kuwait as yet?
All the
At 11:27 PM 2/7/2006, Nick Feamster wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote:
My answer, in short, was to say that I see it as more of an enterprise
play because it's a managed service and the hardest part of
provisioning is typically the order cycle.
If you are an ISP, you are theoretically multi homed
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Interconnecting in a government exchange is
still peering.
Uh, not if it's buying transit.
They are peering, even if it isn't by our
definitions.
Uh, Marty... the difference between peering and transit is that they have
Chris has it!
And to be clear, we only require a slow (1 day) provider changeover in
the case that you want to announce your old provider's sub-prefix at a
new provider. For instance, if you are an ATT customer using a 12/8
sub-prefix and change providers but keep the prefix, the prefix will
At 11:55 PM 2/7/2006, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Interconnecting in a government exchange is
still peering.
Uh, not if it's buying transit.
They are peering, even if it isn't by our
definitions.
Uh, Marty... the difference
On 7-Feb-2006, at 20:50, Martin Hannigan wrote:
As Joe's pointed out, what's available in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and
Kuwait are governmental monopoly incumbent transit services, a la
STIX, as
opposed to Internet exchanges where peering takes place. There are
several private colocation
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Bill Woodcock wrote:
different definitions. If you say transit is peering, just not by our
definitions, then you're into 1984 territory.
So what exactly is definition of transit that does not make it peering?
And when ISP A buys access from ISP B for purpose of getting
At 01:11 AM 2/8/2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 7-Feb-2006, at 20:50, Martin Hannigan wrote:
As Joe's pointed out, what's available in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and
Kuwait are governmental monopoly incumbent transit services, a la
STIX, as
opposed to Internet exchanges where peering takes place.
37 matches
Mail list logo
