On Monday 03 Jul 2006 06:16, you wrote:
Forgive the relative noobishness of the question, but I've not had to deal
with this sort of situation before. Should I be forwarding to RIPE?
I don't think RIPE will be that interested.
The address range gets connectivity from someone. I suggest
This is a known problem with known solutions. There are RBL's, bayesian
filters, behaviour filters, and what not.
For a phpbb forum I'd suggest a captcha, although that's extremely
annoying.
This is becoming the next (last) spamvertising medium and Google poisoning
medium. I and others spend
Hello,
We have been looking at Huawei line of routers recently and i was kind
of surprised to see they have Core stuff, that are able to handle Gigs
of traffic and MPLS, i cant seem to find anyone around that have used
any of these, i wonder if anyone here has, i'd love to hear what he/she
has to
Hello,
We have been looking at Huawei line of routers recently and i was kind
of surprised to see they have Core stuff, that are able to handle Gigs
of traffic and MPLS, i cant seem to find anyone around that have used
any of these, i wonder if anyone here has, i'd love to hear what he/she
has to
Hello,
On Jul 3, 2006, at 3:53 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
On Monday 03 Jul 2006 06:16, you wrote:
Forgive the relative noobishness of the question, but I've not had
to deal
with this sort of situation before. Should I be forwarding to RIPE?
I don't think RIPE will be that interested.
On Jul 3, 2006, at 12:09 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
well, i see that fezhead is dead. but 3-party TCP is alive and well:
http://www.cs.bu.edu/~best/res/projects/DPRClusterLoadBalancing/.
see also http://www.tenereillo.com/GSLBPageOfShame.htm
and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Vixie
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:09 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: DNS Based Load Balancers
The problem being that most of what you linked to below is
either A)
out of
There is an opening on the NANOG Mail List Administration Panel.
According to the draft charter[1]:
... The NANOG list will be administered and minimally
moderated by a panel selected by the Steering Committee.
Accordingly, the Steering Committee is soliciting nominations for
this
Without getting into a massive back and forth, I just want to make 3
points:
as long as the back-and-forth remains informative and constructive, i'll play:
1) Websphere is proprietary to IBM and requires their servers. It's not
scalable to other applications. It's also not targeted to the
With three days left and no mention of it from the folks that matter,
I'm referring NANOG readers to:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/frnotices/2006/NOI_DNS_Transition_0506.htm
From the article:
SUMMARY: The United States Department of Commerce's National
Telecommunications and
just as one can always find an example that supports one's
preconceptions, one can always find a single counterexample
that will support one's prejudices. i'm sure that any
technology can be successfully demo'd or successfully
counter-demo'd. this conversation started out as what DNS
11 matches
Mail list logo
