http://www.cidr-report.org/#General_Status
+2500 last night. It seems that the origin of this disease is in France.
... quoting myself:
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:04:06 +0100
From: Fredy Kuenzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Init Seven AG - http://www.init7.net/
Subject: Routing Table Jump
BGP Update Report
Interval: 07-Jul-06 -to- 20-Jul-06 (14 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS4637
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS855 24942 1.8% 43.5 -- CANET-ASN-4 - Aliant Telecom
2 - AS123924304
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 21 21:45:00 2006 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:51:33 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler said:
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
3263 0-3263 AS4151USDA-1 - USDA
so I wonder what's wrong with them.
I'm not sure which is more weird - a jump of over 3K routes,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:42:04PM +0200, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:51:33 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler said:
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
3263 0-3263 AS4151USDA-1 - USDA
so I wonder what's wrong with
Just to make it clear: AS4151 was 9 month ago. Now we see history again
with new actors. (I guess the actual increase was done by various ASN of
RENATER).
I'm curious how you reach the conclusion that RENATER has contributed
to many of the prefixes over the last week. They do seem to have
-- Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:42:04PM +0200, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:51:33 +0200, Fredy Kuenzler said:
Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
3263 0-3263 AS4151USDA-1
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Fergie wrote:
to be good actors. Perhaps it's time to bring back the old /19
filters that were started by sprint such.
I was just thinking the same thing. :-)
Maybe with a central feed ala the bogons, where those clueful enough can
get their smaller blocks punched
Rob Evans schrieb:
Just to make it clear: AS4151 was 9 month ago. Now we see history
again with new actors. (I guess the actual increase was done by
various ASN of RENATER).
I'm curious how you reach the conclusion that RENATER has contributed
to many of the prefixes over the last week.
On 21-Jul-2006, at 09:17, Rob Evans wrote:
There seem to be a whole load of ASNs that have deaggregated. AS5416,
AS5639, AS6140, AS9121, AS13049, AS16130, AS17849, AS18049 (that's as
far as I got before getting bored). Some of these are advertising the
covering prefix too, so they're
On 21-Jul-2006, at 10:48, Joe Abley wrote:
It would help immensely with getting that document published if
people could read that draft, and let me know if it looks like
something they would implement if it was implemented. Private mail
would be great.
Uh, something they would deploy
On (2006-07-21 10:48 -0400), Joe Abley wrote:
As it happens, Tony Li, Rex Fernando and I wrote up a proposal for a
new attribute which might help in some of these situations. (It's a
crude mechanism, but not as crude as NO_EXPORT).
On 21-Jul-2006, at 11:20, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2006-07-21 10:48 -0400), Joe Abley wrote:
As it happens, Tony Li, Rex Fernando and I wrote up a proposal for a
new attribute which might help in some of these situations. (It's a
crude mechanism, but not as crude as NO_EXPORT).
On (2006-07-21 11:38 -0400), Joe Abley wrote:
That seems to me like another perfectly valid approach, and one that
already exists to some extent (e.g. by pre-poisoning AS_PATH
attributes with AS numbers of remote networks that you don't want to
accept particular routes). I'm told that
Hello all,
Does anyone have a line on any canned emails to send to end-users? Do
such things exist? I have a few in my arsenal, but I'm getting sick of
writing them. I just realized today that I don't have one for a customer
who's is possession of a zombie spambot computer and is spewing
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Fergie wrote:
It's not, people are just lazy and since nobody owns the internet
man, or maybe it's all a bunch of tubes there's nobody to force people
to be good actors. Perhaps it's time to bring back the old /19
filters that were started by sprint such.
I was
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:59:35 EDT, Jon Lewis said:
As we push closer to the ipv4 route table limits of cisco's 6500/7600
series (with anything less than Sup720-3bxl), I suspect lots of networks
are going to be forced to start doing some sort of filtering of routes
beyond just refusing
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The big question is, of course, whether to upgrade a 6500 and keep it on
life support, or bite the bullet and go for a whole new box. How much time
a -3bxl and careful filtering will buy you does depend heavily on where in
the Internet you are -
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 01:59:35PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
As we push closer to the ipv4 route table limits of cisco's 6500/7600
series (with anything less than Sup720-3bxl), I suspect lots of networks
are going to be forced to start doing some sort of filtering of routes
beyond just
Perhaps not the best place to ask, but I thought I would try.
Anyone know or have more information on the Qwest 14-State LD Network
Outage?
It's been going on for the better part of this morning.
At times, can not call LD from the Qwest network, nor can anyone call
into the Qwest network.
We use Qwest as our LD provider at several call centers and have not had any
issues reported (and they ARE finicky !). Perhaps it's some sort of issue
between your provider and Qwest or something more localized?
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
We are experiencing it, too. We are being told by ZONETELECOM (which
purchased WRLD Alliance Communications a few months back) that a Nortel
switch in the midwest is the cause of the trouble.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Probably will have final tweaks. Web site: http://isotf.org/isoi.html
Please note, aside to bringing us all together, one of the main goals is
seeing the different perspectives and current operations of the different
sides of the fight.
Namely:
Law enforcement, Anti Viruses, Anti Spam, Dynamic
Just a quick update -- I thought some of you may be interested in
the developments here.
http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6097376.html
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:25:46 CDT, Gadi Evron said:
Please note, aside to bringing us all together, one of the main goals is
seeing the different perspectives and current operations of the different
sides of the fight.
The agenda is quite tight.
Perhaps *too* tight. When I was at Usenix
25 matches
Mail list logo
