On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Paul Vixie wrote:
and yet, when i consider my nontechnical friends with their DSL and cablemodem
connections, i know that if they get hit by an exploding DLL, their ISP is one
of the likely places they will place a call.
For assistance with Microsoft security issues in
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Randy Bush wrote:
but there are a couple of more significant issues being discussed over
there, those surrounding the community's desires for maintaining mailing
list archive integrity.
Personally I find it sad that at the prospect of a list archive being
censored,
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:41:41 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Paul, what exponent does the new key use? (I clicked on the public key
link, but I can't decode the base64 that easily...)
Here's a fairly simple way to extract e:
$ for rdata in `dig dlv.isc.org. dnskey +short
i've
assumed that the hardcore bgp engineering community now meets elsewhere.
Or perhaps BGP engineering hasn't changed in so many years
that it is now more than adequately covered by books,
certificate courses, and internal sharing of expertise.
Lists are good for things that are new or
that, and a thread where half of the posts are from the
initial poster himself anyway. but then, happily watching
him, at least he is creative in topics... i am mentally
killfilling his threads anyway, less and less relevant.
it is scary what stuff is discussed lately.
-ako
OK, Alexander
To the people who say we throw in the towel and just say Gadi will
never
stop posting off-topic crap, so why bother trying to correct him?, I'd
suggest that this is a self-defeating attitude. Not only because Gadi
could actually be posting useful stuff if set on the right path as to
what
Well said. He can't respond right now, his computer has been infected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:18 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Have you really got clue?
that, and a thread
P.S. Note that I do not agree that anyone has yet tried
to correct Gadi.
i guess what i've found most bemusing about this whole thread is -- i went
looking for the first email Gadi posted.
turns out that his posting habits have convinced Outlook that his email is
junk - and _all_ of his posts
On a website I host with nearly 9000 unique visits month-to-date (thats
visits, not hits) a full 20% of the recorded 'hits' (Hitcount is ~40,000)
are being generated by 'msnbot'. We see this as a large amount of http
traffic from IP addresses owned by Microsoft.
I've actually seen this
On 22 Sep 2006, at 11:06, Lincoln Dale wrote:
P.S. Note that I do not agree that anyone has yet tried
to correct Gadi.
i guess what i've found most bemusing about this whole thread is --
i went
looking for the first email Gadi posted.
turns out that his posting habits have convinced
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Sep-06 -to- 21-Sep-06 (14 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS4637
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS855 20458 1.9% 35.8 -- CANET-ASN-4 - Aliant Telecom
2 - AS17974 19425
This report has been generated at Fri Sep 22 21:45:37 2006 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
On Friday 22 Sep 2006 11:39, you wrote:
Is this unusual, or what? Are search engines supposed to be amongst the
biggest user agents recorded on a typical website? How much trolling and
indexing is considered 'too much' ?
Whenever it becomes a problem.
If you don't have enough genuine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if anyone else here thinks they know what is
on topic, please tell us.
I am getting bored by the flood of negative messages
that say only You can't say that here. Please stop
telling us what you cannot say on NANOG. If you really
must register your discontent
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Unless we're ready to admit that NANOG is completely and totally worthless
as a forum for discussing network operations, people NEED to step up and
take responsibility for the self policing that we're all supposed to be
doing in srh's absence.
I think you meant
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:11:20 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or perhaps BGP engineering hasn't changed in so many years
that it is now more than adequately covered by books,
certificate courses, and internal sharing of expertise.
Lists are good for things that are new or confusing or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Donelan) writes:
For assistance with Microsoft security issues in the US, call (866) PC-SAFETY
according to http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2019162,00.asp, microsoft has
not released a patch for the VML thing, so calling (866) PC-SAFETY isn't going
to be a
On 9/22/06, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is pretty simple, really. These are examples of the topics that are
on-topic.
1. that posting is off-topic.
2. somebody with clue from ${SmallUnknownOperator} (e.g. AOL) please
contact me off list about a connectivity issue.:
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL
Once again, ONE arguably off-topic post, followed by a non-stop stream
of DOZENS of messages, for days, by self-appointed listcops.
I'm sorry if the only thing which prompts you, and you know who you
are, to post is that little rush of self-righteous adrenaline upon
seeing a message you think
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Paul Vixie wrote:
For assistance with Microsoft security issues in the US, call (866) PC-SAFETY
last but not least, according to http://isotf.org/zert/ there is a non-MSFT
patch for the VML thing. i don't expect ISP's to recommend its use, due to
liability reasons, but
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:38:15AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
at least a rather updated version of ucb mail, that also does imap /
pop / ssl / smtp + auth etc
heirloom mailx aka nail - http://nail.sourceforge.net
Try: http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/mailx.html. Moved to
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:37:40PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On 21 Sep 2006 17:01:45 +, Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul, what exponent does the new key use? (I clicked on the public key
link, but I can't decode the base64 that easily...)
it was made with bind9's
Hmmm. It wouldn't have anything to do with prime numbers, now would
it? :-)
- ferg
-- Joseph S D Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Steve has pointed out that 3 is recommended for DNSSEC, and NIST likes
65537 [2^16 + 1]. I don't have the maths to say why, so I'll leave it
at that.
--
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:39:51PM +, Fergie wrote:
Hmmm. It wouldn't have anything to do with prime numbers, now would
it? :-)
Well, yes, but there are an infinite number of them.
Of course, 17 is the most prime of them all.
--
Joe Yao
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:55:39 -0400
From: Joseph S D Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fergie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: fyi-- [dns-operations] early key rollover for dlv.isc.org
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:39:51PM +, Fergie wrote:
Hmmm. It wouldn't have anything
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:29:31 -0400, Joseph S D Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not having committed the maths to heart, I might be able to explain it a
little differently.
Well, yes, I did just teach the RSA equations to my Network Security
class
--Steven M. Bellovin,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Simon Waters wrote:
On Friday 22 Sep 2006 11:39, you wrote:
Is this unusual, or what? Are search engines supposed to be amongst the
biggest user agents recorded on a typical website? How much trolling and
indexing is considered 'too much' ?
Whenever it becomes a
But of course.
So ask yourself; What is special about 3 and 65537?
- ferg
-- Joseph S D Yao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:39:51PM +, Fergie wrote:
Hmmm. It wouldn't have anything to do with prime numbers, now would
it? :-)
Well, yes, but there are an infinite
29 matches
Mail list logo
