BGP Update Report

2007-01-12 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report Interval: 29-Dec-06 -to- 11-Jan-07 (14 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS4637 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS822069155 2.4% 247.0 -- COLT COLT Telecommunications 2 - AS28751 35645

The Cidr Report

2007-01-12 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 12 21:45:54 2007 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report. Recent Table

RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Frank Bulk
If we're becoming a VOD world, does multicast play any practical role in video distribution? Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michal Krsek Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:28 AM To: Marshall Eubanks Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject:

RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Frank Bulk
You mean the NCTC? Yes, they did close their doors for new membership, but there are regional head ends that represent a larger number of ITCs that have been able to directly negotiate with the content providers. And then there's the turnkey vendors: IPTV Americas, SES Americom' IP-PRIME, and

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Gian Constantine
Yes, the NCTC. I have spoken with two of the vendors you mentioned. Neither have pass-through licensing rights. I still have to go directly to most of the content providers to get the proper licensing rights. There are a few vendors out there who will help a company attain these rights,

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Gian Constantine
I am pretty sure we are not becoming a VoD world. Linear programming is much better for advertisers. I do not think content providers, nor consumers, would prefer a VoD only service. A handful of consumers would love it, but many would not. Gian Anthony Constantine Senior Network Design

RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Frank Bulk
Gian: I ahven't spoken to any of those turnkey providers. Sounds like just the hardware, plant infrastructure, and transport is turnkey. =) Getting content rights is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] That and the associated price tag is probably the largest non-technical barrier to IP TV deployments

Re: Web Honeynet Project: announcement, exploit URLs this Wednesday

2007-01-12 Thread Gadi Evron
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Ken A wrote: What about common tools that are already being used for this? Non are perfect (or close to) for this, but I am not discussing tools (yet), just the data. Gadi.

Re: i wanna be a kpn peer

2007-01-12 Thread David Freedman
Randy Bush wrote: route-views.oregon-ix.netsh ip bg 203.10.63.0 BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 286 134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45) Origin IGP, localpref 100,

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Michal Krsek
Dear Gian, from my perspecitve (central europe) it looks like the linear programming is used only in TV/radio channels. But this is only a part of the media industry. Cinema, DVD and other forms of content distribution aren't linear. I don't like to waste Internet capacity with URLs to large

Weekly Routing Table Report

2007-01-12 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Michael Painter
- Original Message - From: Gian Constantine Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:24 AM Subject: Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously? Yes, the NCTC. I have spoken with two of the vendors you mentioned. Neither have pass-through licensing rights. I still have

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Gian Constantine
I have spoken with a colleague in the industry regarding 4com. Apparently, they have been able to acquire some sort of pass-through licensing on much of the content, but I have not spoken directly with 4com. I heard the same of Broadstream and SES Americom, but both proved to be more of an

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Frank Bulk wrote: If we're becoming a VOD world, does multicast play any practical role in video distribution? Not to end users. I think multicast is used a fair amount for precaching; presumably that would increase in this scenario. Regards Marshall

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

2007-01-12 Thread Steve Sobol
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: My experience is that when you show people VoD, they like it. I have to admit the wow factor is there. But I already have access to VoD through my cable company and its set-top boxes. TV over IP brings my family exactly zero additional

Nanog subscribers to pull down 2 megabytes a day, continuously ... of one thread

2007-01-12 Thread nealr
Its the Energizer Bunny thread of 2007 ... 135 messages so far and still going strong. Steve Sobol wrote: On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: My experience is that when you show people VoD, they like it. I have to admit the wow factor is there. But I already have