On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:09:58PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 553 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [69.28.69.2]
blocked using reject-all.vix.com; reason / created)
- Transcript
On 1-Feb-2007, at 06:50, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Well...
reject-all.vix.com. 3600IN NS ns.lah1.vix.com.
reject-all.vix.com. 3600IN NS ns.sql1.vix.com.
dig any 2.0.0.127.reject-all.vix.com @ns.sql1.vix.com gives
status: REFUSED
and as ns.lah1.vix.com does
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:21:19AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
... or alternatively, that this is a private DNSRBL which has access
restrictions.
Yeah i was missing the while talking to sa.vix.com part in Jon's mail,
sorry for the confusion.
Stefan
--
I refuse to answer that question
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:04:37PM -0800, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
(As an example, consider what happens *to you*
if a hospital stops getting emailed results back from their outside
laboratory service because their email firewall is checking your
server, and someone dies as a result of the
We've told people for years that when they choose to use a DNSBL or
RHSBL that they need to (a) subscribe to the relevant mailing list,
if it has one and/or (b) periodically revisit the relevant web site,
if it has one, so that they can keep themselves informed about any
changes in its status or
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
(As an example, consider what happens *to you* if a hospital stops
getting emailed results back from their outside laboratory service
because their email firewall is checking your server, and someone
dies as a result of the delay)
You may want to contact Fibernet (now a Global Crossing company), they
have some PoPs there with fiber and general connectivity.
We are also present there and can provide connectivity, but not co-location.
Dave.
Andrew Gristina wrote:
I have two racks in London UK. The colocation is
Why not write a real-time script and loop the querier right back to his own
self...
Luzer -- *.vix.com -- Luzer
This sort of reminded me of the days of bandwidth raping where others used
someone's own bandwidth to their own disadvantage.
We've told people for years that when they choose to
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:29:12 CST, J. Oquendo said:
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
Bottom line is that in the absence of a promise -- explicit or implicit (!)
-- to the contrary, you can usually turn off your gear and get on with your
life
Promissory Estoppel might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
chuckle Perhaps you should list (in the zone) all IP addresses
which are
repeatedly querying the zone -- after announcing this policy, of
course. ;-)
Actually, looking at that list it looks
If no one's been sued before because they've wild carded a defunct
RBL, what's the big deal? When someone tries their best, goes out to
an intelligent group to get their opinions, and spends a HUGE amount
of effort, and incurs measurable monetary damage (bandwidth, time,
etc) and when the
Just curious, the customer wants to purchase cogent bandwidth through
you instead of going directly?
Wouldn't it be easier just to have Cogent run another connection to the
Meet Me Room in your facility and just extend it to their cage or rack?
This seems like a lot of over engineering to
Hi,
I'm going to be running the IPv6 Network Operations BOF at NANOG 39 in
Toronto. The BOF will be held in Sheraton Hall B/C, 2pm to 3.30pm on
Tuesday February 6th.
A basic list of topics is available via the agenda page. If you have
any other (relevant) issues you'd like to raise about
I suppose in some universe, it *IS* possible that Paul could be found
negligent by some jury trial and ordered to pay millions of dollars.
But that's the same universe were swine routinely fly to and fourth
across the green sky.
Apparently you've never been in a jury trial and hopefully
[Apologies for the following non-operational content; if you are not
coming to Toronto next week, hit delete now]
For those attending NANOG 39 in Toronto next week who don't already
see enough generic data centre space in their normal work week, there
will be a TorIX tour on Tuesday
(this must be my week for past-sins pennance related to RBL's.)
today someone whose e-mail was blocked when they tried to send it to an att
customer, asked the authors of RFC 2317 to please unblock their address. as
the only such author whose e-mail address hasn't changed since RFC publication
I'm not from ATT, but that page contains three errors and three What to do
sections. The section referring to RFC 2317 is for DNS errors:
“550 Error. Blocked for status: unknown sender”: This error indicates that no
identifying information has been entered into the DNS (Domain Name System)
Rick Kunkel wrote:
Hello all,
Being relatively new to the colocation business, we run into a fair number
of issues that we've never run into before. Got a new one today, and
although I can think of kludgey ways to accomplish what he wants, I'd
rather get some other ideas first...
We
On 2/1/07, Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and btw, if you're going to block inbound e-mail, you need to give senders
some idea of how to get unblocked. not for fairness, just for practicality.
and this parenthesized paragraph is why i count this screed as not-off-topic.)
Putting on my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:---
From: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an, ahem, lawyer, I think what you do and how you do it matter a lot
...
Pulling a plug after reasonable/lots of warnings (did you miss anyone? how
do you know for sure?) is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Wallingford) writes:
... Considering the time passed since maps went defunct, Paul is
entirely justified in doing whatever is necessary to cluebat the
offending networks, imho.
thanks for those supportive words. note that MAPS is not defunct. the
domain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Wallingford) writes:
Ultimately, the problem is that the idealism which was more or less the
rule a decade ago has taken a backseat to commercialism ...
i dunno about that. i see a lot of idealism still. volunteers at spamhaus,
and within the da/mwp community, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Lewis) writes:
Why do I even bother?
(reason: 553 5.7.1 Service unavailable; \
Client host [69.28.69.2] blocked using reject-all.vix.com; \
reason / created)
here's what you ran into.
*.69.28.69.reject-all.vix.com. 1800 IN TXT reason sa.vix.com
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Scott Weeks wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:---
From: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an, ahem, lawyer, I think what you do and how you do it matter a lot
...
Pulling a plug after reasonable/lots of warnings (did you miss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Lewis) writes:
As for trying to make it stop, the two methods thought to be most
successful are:
1) maps.vix.com. 604800 IN NS .
i've tried that. the retry rate actually goes up rather than down.
2) maps.vix.com. 604800 IN NS
Just add to your services price list high-reliability electronic mail
service: $10,000/month or whatever with some general wording about
how suitable it is for customers who rely on email for critical and
high-dollar business dealings, life and death situations, and similar.
Point to it from
David Ulevitch wrote:
Not offering a solution but a bit of an explanation perhaps...
From: http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html
If you do not supply any -r options, rblsmtpd tries an RBL source of
rbl.maps.vix.com. This will be changed in subsequent versions.
So checking the last
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:
1) maps.vix.com.604800 IN NS .
i've tried that. the retry rate actually goes up rather than down.
That's pretty messed up. I've tested both the strategies I suggested, and
at least with both bind9 and DJB's dnscache, the caching
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:08:32PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:---
From: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an, ahem, lawyer, I think what you do and how you do it matter a lot
...
Pulling a plug after reasonable/lots
We have reserved one hour of the NANOG 39 agenda for Lightning Talks.
A lightning talk is a very short presentation or speech by any
attendee on
any topic relevant to the NANOG audience. These are limited to ten
minutes;
this will be strictly enforced.
If you have a topic that's timely,
On February 1, 2007 at 05:34 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roland Dobbins) wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
(As an example, consider what happens *to you* if a hospital stops
getting emailed results back from their outside laboratory service
because their email
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:
thanks for those supportive words. note that MAPS is not defunct. the
domain MAPS.VIX.COM is defunct, in favour of MAIL-ABUSE.ORG, which was
originally an asset of MAPS LLC, then Kelkea, and lately Trend Micro.
They seem to have preferred
At 11:19 PM -0500 1/31/07, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
As an, ahem, lawyer, I think what you do and how you do it matter a lot here.
And it would be prudent to talk to someone who understood your facts and
situation before doing some of the things discussed in this thread.
I'm hearing reports of a Fiber Cut between College Park, GA and Tallahassee,
FL. Can anyone chime in on specifics?
thanks
Pablo
Just received some individual threads with feedback. Thanks for the replies!
On 2/1/07, Pablo Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hearing reports of a Fiber Cut between College Park, GA and
Tallahassee, FL. Can anyone chime in on specifics?
thanks
Pablo
Do old packets ever go away on the Internet? How many DNS packets still
wander towards SRI-NIC.ARPA's old root server at 26.0.0.73?
At some point, regardless of what the lawyers say, you've got to make your
own decision and move on. Things change on the Internet, if you don't
maintain your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Pablo Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just received some individual threads with feedback. Thanks for the
replies!
Individual threads? Sweet.
Send us pictures. ;-)
- - ferg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3
Set up a nameserver there. Configure it to return 127.0.0.2 (or
whatever the old MAPS reply for spam was) to all queries. Let it run
for a week. See if anything changes in terms of it getting hammered.
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Impulse Internet
38 matches
Mail list logo
