On 26-Feb-2007, at 17:39, Jared Mauch wrote:
[ snip ]
We expect (empirically) a dip in the winter meetings, which I think
is illustrated by the numbers above (with Toronto and Salt Lake City
as outliers). The theory that is most frequently put forward to
explain the winter dip
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:31:30AM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
Counting IP addresses tends to greatly overestimate and underestimate
the problem of compromised machines.
It tends to overestimate the problem in networks with large dynamic
pools of IP addresses as a few compromised machines
We lost a bunch of MCI circuits at 8am EST this morning and the colo
provider informed us there was some kind of explosion on the 3rd floor.
Anyone have additional info or details ? Not sure how serious - our power
is still on and our XO and ATT circuits are still up as well as bandwidth.
I had a sonet link through there drop from 7:56 to 8:07 this morning.
Haven't gotten ahold of my SE yet to hear the story.
-jim
On 2/28/07, Eric Kagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We lost a bunch of MCI circuits at 8am EST this morning and the colo
provider informed us there was some kind of
On 2/28/07, jim bartus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a sonet link through there drop from 7:56 to 8:07 this morning.
Haven't gotten ahold of my SE yet to hear the story.
-jim
On 2/28/07, Eric Kagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We lost a bunch of MCI circuits at 8am EST this morning and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Catalyst 6000, 6500 and Cisco 7600
Series MPLS Packet Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20070228-mpls
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2007 February 28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Catalyst 6000, 6500 Series and Cisco
7600 Series NAM (Network Analysis Module) Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20070228-nam
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2007 February 28
me again.
So wifi at pycon 07 was 'better than 06' witch I hear was a complete disaster.
More on 07's coming soon.
Now we are talking about wifi at pycon 08, which will be at a different hotel
(Crown Plaza in Rosemont, IL) and the question came up: Can the hotel actively
prevent us from
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:35:43PM -0600, Carl Karsten wrote:
me again.
So wifi at pycon 07 was 'better than 06' witch I hear was a complete
disaster. More on 07's coming soon.
Now we are talking about wifi at pycon 08, which will be at a different
hotel (Crown Plaza in Rosemont, IL)
Could you please contact me off list?
Sorry for the clutter...
-Wil
While the hotel cannot prevent you from using Wi-Fi, but they could:
a) restrict you from attaching equipment to their internet connection
(unless you contracted for that and the contract didn't restrict
attachments) or electrical outlets
b) ask you to leave and charge you for trespassing if you
I'd like to thank the group for the responses and help with this issue. I
find it ironic that Randy's study actually uses 96 space.
Thanks again!
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Ortega
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:17 PM
It's about revenue recovery. If you provide your own free wifi, they are
losing potential business. It's usually part of the negotiation with the
Hotel.
-Steve
On 2/28/07, Carl Karsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me again.
So wifi at pycon 07 was 'better than 06' witch I hear was a complete
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:28:11PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote:
While the hotel cannot prevent you from using Wi-Fi, but they could:
a) restrict you from attaching equipment to their internet connection
(unless you contracted for that and the contract didn't restrict
attachments) or electrical
On Feb 28, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Steve Meuse wrote:
It's about revenue recovery. If you provide your own free wifi,
they are losing potential business. It's usually part of the
negotiation with the Hotel.
Yes, some Hotels will indeed want revenue recovery for this - they
will
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:18:24PM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Feb 28, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Steve Meuse wrote:
It's about revenue recovery. If you provide your own free wifi,
they are losing potential business. It's usually part of the
negotiation with the Hotel.
Yes, some Hotels
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:38:10 -0500
From: Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FCC on wifi at hotel
[[.. munch ..]]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-157A1.pdf
I do suggest reading this. They can not legally bar you from
using the devices.
On 2/28/07, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-157A1.pdf
I do suggest reading this. They can not legally bar you from
using the devices. They can charge you outrageous fees to get to/from
the MMR or telco demarc and
On 2/28/07, Steve Meuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/07, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-157A1.pdf
I do suggest reading this. They can not legally bar you from
using the devices. They can charge you outrageous
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
On 2/28/07, *Steve Meuse* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2/28/07, *Jared Mauch* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-157A1.pdf
On 2/28/07, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
On 2/28/07, *Steve Meuse* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2/28/07, *Jared Mauch* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
21 matches
Mail list logo
