On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
Not to drag this too far off topic, but have serious studies been done
looking at moving switching fabric closer to the DSLAMs (versus doing
everything PPPoE)? I know this sort of goes opposite of how ILECs are
setup to dish out DSL, but as more
Nathan Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Nice rant though :-)
agreed.
...
Does anyone have info on how bind (and other recursive resolvers)
select whether to use v6 or v4 if an NS points at a resource with both
A and records? Most OSes prefer the record, does bind behave
the
On 10/12/07, Lorell Hathcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
www.sun.com/blackbox
Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?
I hear that there's been one sighted in Houston. I would love to take a
tour.
Also, is anyone using anything like this? It seems like they would make
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Paul Ferguson wrote:
No, not necessarily. Given that there are Tier 1 ISPs, Tier 2, etc.,
so you can certainly have some small-ish ISP colluding with criminal
activity, in effect, by ignoring it or claiming ignorance.
However, it's kind of hard to plead ignorance when,
* Mike Lewinski:
Florian Weimer wrote:
I don't know what case prompted Ferg to post his message to NANOG, but I
know that there are cases where failing to act is comparable to ignoring
the screams for help of an alleged rape victim during the alleged
crime.
I'm reminded of this story
Sean Donelan wrote:
I don't know of any ISP that regularly (i.e. more than once) refuses to
obey lawful orders of authorities in the relevant jurisdiction to take
action.
No disagreement there, but take a look at the wording. orders of
authorities. Inference: It's ok if someone I'm leasing
That's the issue with these things. It seems that everyone likes the idea,
but no one wants to be the early adopters.
It was pointed out to me that Google has patented the idea, but yet Sun has
working on Project Blackbox for a couple of years. I wonder if there will
be a legal battle
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 17:07 -0500, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
- Disaster Recovery
I can see portable generators being part of DR, but not one or more
portable data centers. How long would it take you to start up a second
instance of all the hosts and devices you have in a data centers? Isn't
Florian Weimer wrote:
Anyway, if you've got a customer account that was created with a stolen
credit card, and you get complaints about activity on that account from
various parties, and you still don't act, this shows a rather
significant level of carelessness. The other side of the story is
We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great concept.
I know Sun has had the boxes here in DC on tour and worth checking out. I
believe FEMA was in process of looking into leveraging them for disaster
command centers along with the military.
I think the better approach is
Jerry Dixon wrote:
We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great
concept. I know Sun has had the boxes here in DC on tour and worth
checking out. I believe FEMA was in process of looking into leveraging
them for disaster command centers along with the military.
As a
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, J. Oquendo wrote:
Personally, if I were a business owner, I would attempt my
best to keep my networks in order and ensure that traffic being
sent *from* my network to the world wasn't tainted in any
shape form or fashion.
This is basically the clause for terminating
Poor word choice on my part regarding command center versus data
service augmentation.
However there are many capabilities that this setup can bring to bear
no differently than a military TOC is established out in a forward
operating site.
I do agree that a good DR plan and hot/warm
13 matches
Mail list logo
