RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs

2007-11-12 Thread Frank Bulk
I would have disagree with your point on centralized AP controllers -- almost all the vendors have some form of high availability, and Trapeze's offering, new (and may not yet be G.A) purports to be almost entirely seamless in its load sharing and failover support. Now that dual-band radios in

Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs

2007-11-12 Thread Randy Bush
Frank Bulk wrote: I would have disagree with your point on centralized AP controllers you can do so when you have deployed successfully in meeting rooms of 2000 people. joel has. randy

Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs

2007-11-12 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Frank Bulk wrote: I would have disagree with your point on centralized AP controllers -- almost all the vendors have some form of high availability, and Trapeze's offering, new (and may not yet be G.A) purports to be almost entirely seamless in its load sharing and failover support. I have a

Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs

2007-11-12 Thread Carl Karsten
Thank you for all the advice - it was nice to see 20 replies that all basically agreed (and with me too.) If only the 6 people involved in this project were such. On Wifi for 1000: I have tried to make sure everyone involved in this PyCon Wifi project has read