In a recent Slashdot article
(http://slashdot.org/articles/07/12/17/1451230.shtml) discussing IPv6, someone
left a comment the read, in part One of the largest IPSs (sic) in Europe
turned on IPv6 to all 8 million users this week. They've done the right thing
and made it opt-in for now, their
On 2007/12/17 10:01, Sean Siler wrote:
Does anyone know which ISP the poster is talking about? Is there any truth to
this at all?
http://www.iliad.fr/presse/2007/CP_IPv6_121207.pdf
Thanks to all for your private replies - I have the answer now.
(It appears to be Free.fr, if you are interested.)
http://www.iliad.fr/en/presse/2007/CP_IPv6_121207_eng.pdf
Sean
Sean Siler|IPv6 Program Manager
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I'm looking to do some custom monitoring of a system and the contracted NOC
only supports pings, SNMP queries, and SNMP traps. My first choice was to
send an e-mail and have their system ingest it, but that's not possible, and
the first two aren't an option, which means I'm looking to send them
Cogent's again seeing congestion at their hand-off to ATDN.net.
Traceroutes to their mailservers show packet loss and mail into AOL is
dying a few packets into the conversation.
Cogent says they're waiting on a call back from AOL, no ETR provided.
Carl Hirsch
On Dec 17, 2007 10:29 AM, Sean Siler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all for your private replies - I have the answer now.
(It appears to be Free.fr, if you are interested.)
http://www.iliad.fr/en/presse/2007/CP_IPv6_121207_eng.pdf
I'm glad they managed to get in all the hype for v6
Furthermore, IPv6 simplifies the configuration of devices when connected to
the Internet. It improves data security and supports quality of services.
how does it improve data security exactly?
attackers are daunted by the smoke and mirrors?
sigh this stuff is hard enough to roll without the
Apparently, from what I have gathered from other french people, Free has
rolled out a variation of 6to4 using their own prefix instead of the well
known 2002::/16. As they control their home gateway, this was fairly easy
for them to do and did not require much core infrastructure change. The
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:29:21 -0800
Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how does it improve data security exactly?
Back in 1994, it was expected to be true because v6 would mandate
IPsec, and v6 would be deployed long before the installed base of v4
machines would be upgraded to IPsec.
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:29:21 -0800
Christopher Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how does it improve data security exactly?
Back in 1994, it was expected to be true because v6 would mandate
IPsec, and v6 would be deployed long before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[re: v6 mythos]
In a slightly more realistic vein, a huge address space makes life
harder for scanning worms. As Angelos Keromytis, Bill Cheswick, and I
have pointed out, harder is by no means
On Dec 17, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
when client-side attacks seem to be more than sufficient.
A self-selected group of victims really helps lower the
reconnaissance opex, heh.
;
---
Roland Dobbins
On Dec 17, 2007 9:59 PM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[re: v6 mythos]
In a slightly more realistic vein, a huge address space makes life
harder for scanning worms. As Angelos
13 matches
Mail list logo
