On 15 Jan 2008, at 16:11, Ben Butler wrote:
As a transit consumer - why would I want to carry all this cr*p in my
routing table, I would still be getting a BGP route to the larger
prefix
anyway - let my transit feeds sort out which route they use traffic
engineering.
Maybe you don't get
Because the industry needs to attract capital, which is difficult when the
payback period on capital expenditures continunes to climb and hence the rate
of return continues to fall.
The incumbents love to talk about what a great quarter they had selling DSL.
But very few (if any) will
Hi All,
Ukrainian NOG: [EMAIL PROTECTED], no site (yet?), almost all
discussions are in Russian (some few - in Ukrainian). Meets near Kiev
(the capital of Ukraine) every last weekend of May (Provaiderovka),
but this meetings are not open for everybody.
--
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE,
No we do not however we are allocated a invariant budget to deliver
services for a fixed period of time.We cannot 'raise' prices as the
pot of funds needs to be allocated to scholarship, teaching, housing and
all the other things which make up a university we provide a service
which must
Condensing a few messages into one:
Mikael Abrahamsson writes:
Customers want control, that's why the prepaid mobile phone where you get
an account you have to prepay into, are so popular in some markets. It
also enables people who perhaps otherwise would not be eligable because of
bad
On 17 Jan 2008, at 12:45, Jeff McAdams wrote:
Tony Li wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Mike Donahue wrote:
Anyway, it's all getting (for us) pretty complicated. We're a
fairly small firm and just want an Ethernet handoff with our IP
block on it. Sprint didn't blink at the request,
multi-homed. ATT says they'll give us a temporary ASN, and want us
to do eBGP for our netblock. They sent the technical information over
today, and they want two distinct routers to act as the bgp peers...
Two different Quagga instances running on different loopback addresses
on the same
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 15 Jan 2008, at 16:11, Ben Butler wrote:
As a transit consumer - why would I want to carry all this cr*p in my
routing table, I would still be getting a BGP route to the larger prefix
anyway - let my transit feeds sort out which route they use
On Jan 19, 2008 11:48 AM, Andy Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's some debate in RIPE land right now that discusses, what
actually is the automatic, free, right to PI ? Every other network
in the world pays the cost when someone single homes but wants their /
24 prefix on everyone
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:39:14PM -0800, S. Ryan wrote:
Anyone know how one would get a hold of a Charter.com DNS Administrator?
$ dig charter.com soa +short
ns1.charter.com. ipaddressing.chartercom.com. 2008017401 7200 3600 604800 86400
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE
If service is metered, it doesn't imply 25 cents a minute. It would probably be
based on bytes transferred and would probably be less expensive for the bulk of
users than the current flat rate pricing. If the cable companies are telling
the truth, roughly 5% of their customers generate 50% of
Rod Beck wrote:
Ironically, the Net Neutrality debate is about the access providers
trying to impose usage-based pricing through the backdor - on the
content providers. It goes without saying I oppose it. It's the end
users who decide what they view and hence ultimately generate the
Except if the cable companies want to get rid of the 5% of heavy users, they
can't raise the prices for that 5% and recover their costs. The MSOs want
it win-win: they'll bring prices for metered access slightly lower than
unlimited access, making it attractive for a large segment of the user
On 17/01/2008, at 1:55 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
NZNog – The New Zealand Operator Group - http://www.nznog.org/
- 2008 Conference will be held in a couple of week - http://2008.nznog.org/
s/a couple of/1/
It starts this coming Wednesday, and goes until Friday.
--
Nathan Ward
Anyone currently aware of a Qwest outage? My qwest sites are down, even
qwest.com
daniel
Daniel wrote:
Anyone currently aware of a Qwest outage? My qwest sites are down, even
qwest.com http://qwest.com
daniel
Nope.
traceroute www.qwest.com
traceroute to www.qwest.com (155.70.40.252), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.255.1 (192.168.255.1) 0.287 ms 0.232 ms 0.332
Yea. it came back up right after I sent that e mail. My sites are now up
again as well.
On Jan 19, 2008 11:15 PM, Jeff Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Anyone currently aware of a Qwest outage? My qwest sites are down, even
qwest.com http://qwest.com
daniel
Nope.
Funny, I saw nothing on Qwest's stat site, either:
http://stat.qwest.net/statqwest/perfRptIndex.jsp
http://stat.qwest.net/index_flash.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Shultz
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 12:16 AM
To:
Yes it looks like Qwest wasn't having problems. The issues we were seeing
appear to be related to ATT.
On Jan 20, 2008 12:08 AM, Frank Bulk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny, I saw nothing on Qwest's stat site, either:
http://stat.qwest.net/statqwest/perfRptIndex.jsp
Saw Significant Issues in San Francisco starting at 9:17 PM, things
seemed to flap for about 40 mins, then stabalize, and I'm seeing issues
pick up again in the last 10 minutes or so.
Little Rock, AR also did see some issues...didn't seem as bad, but I
don't have as much load going into there on
20 matches
Mail list logo
