[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since QoS works by degrading the quality of service
for some streams of packets in a congestion scenario
and since congestion scenarios are most common on
end customer links, it makes sense to let the end
customers fiddle with the QoS settings in both
directions on
Daniel Senie wrote:
Actually, the cable providers have an alternative. Since the cable
network really is broadband in the meaning from before it was
coopted to mean high speed, cable operators are able to utilize many
channels in parallel. If they want their voice traffic to be
unimpeded,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:41:40AM -0700, jc dill wrote:
It is sometimes the case in disasters that people from inside can call
out but that people from outside can't call in because the circuits into
the disaster area become overloaded. This would hold true especially in
the case where
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:46:46PM +, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Has anyone actually noticed any increases in residential
broadband traffic due to Halo 2?
This is lost in the noise of P2P traffic, which is the big bandwidth
eater by far.
I note that the story is essentially based
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:47:42AM -0400, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
On Jun 29, 2004, at 12:44 AM, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
Of course, if you just happen to uphold INTERNET STANDARDS and only
accept routes from where they should originate, I'll buy you a drink
at the next NANOG for being
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:41:50AM -0700, Tony Hain wrote:
While it is often great sport to poke at MS, did you consider that this
might have nothing to do with classfullness or CIDR? I believe you will find
that 0 -1 are invalid for whatever netmask the windows stack is given. You
So
netadm wrote:
http://www.serverpronto.com
Given the thread was started for people who want to get a server for
mail clear of blocklists, why would I want to use a provider on a number
of blocklists per http://www.openrbl.org/, including a SBL/ROKSO listing?
Bob
German Valdez wrote:
In that case you would be blocking all the networks in 29 economies in
Latin american and caribbean region.
The people doing this generally know this. They often also block big
chunks of APNIC too. They often believe that the ratio of legitimate
mail to spam coming from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If RFC1918 addresses are used only on interfaces with jumbo MTUs
on the order of 9000 bytes then it doesn't break PMTUD in a
1500 byte Ethernet world. And it doesn't break traceroute.
We just lose the DNS hint about the router location.
I'm confused about your
Matthew Crocker wrote:
Search the archives, Comcast and other cable/DSL providers use the
10/8 for their infrastructure. The Internet itself doesn't need to be
Internet routable. Only the edges need to be routable. It is common
practice to use RFC1918 address space inside the network.
Andy Dills wrote:
Getting Verizon to do anything involving the internet, even if you possess
the phone number of the department to call, is impossible. They do a good
job with circuits. They do an abysmal job with IP and related issues.
This must be a different Verizon than I dealt with at a
Andy Dills wrote:
Verizon? Colo? ISP?
Probably should have expressed that more clearly. Not colo'ing at
Verizon, but an Internet colocation facility that also provides it's
customers with T1 and Frame Relay connectivity to the Internet.
But they've never had a sonet outage once in our
12 matches
Mail list logo
