i seem to remember other similar 'solicitations' by nanog members
seeking to join up with fellow networkers in their local community,
at the next arin/nanog/sushi/etc meeting...i don't think that this
is really that much different. granted, i don't know how 'tasteful'
it was, but i am sure that
Michael Painter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else having trouble with reaching internet.com via genuity?
i've heard that level3 is doing some work to re-AS genuity - didn't
really pay attention to when it started or how long it would be going
on, but it may be part of the reason
todd glassey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cut]
If you ship pot via FedEx, does the delivery guy go to jail
too?
THIS IS A REALLY BAD EXAMPLE -
not really, did the us postal service get in trouble for delivering
anthrax laden letters? no. if someone at the post office bypassed
the postal
i got one too - i was going to ask if anyone else minded that my
mua was fully rfc 2822 compliant (before telling usa.net that they
have to rewrite their webmail app)...
i like how the examples cited are crap-html/mime oriented (msn,
exchange, and aol?)
Mike Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 09:24, Paul Vixie wrote:
so here's a proposal. we (speaking for ISC here) could add a config
option
(default to OFF) to make bind send some kind of registration packet
at boot
time, containing an e-mail address for a
for all of the $adjective schemes and ideas that have been posted, has
anyone (besides jon and few others affected) been doing anything
substanitive?
outreach, more than any technical 'magic' that we can come up with, is the
only 'real' solution (subjective real, what is real to me probably
interesting idea, enable it by default, with the option to turn it off
(i hope)...
my-big-fat-router# conf t
my-big-fat-router(config)# no ip clueless
Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, Mar 10, 2003, at 10:54 Canada/Eastern, Haesu wrote:
Since most service providers should
building on andy's comments:
is there a forthcoming section on criterium for demonstrating reformation
by the sp and/or 'offending' user? without it, you will leave it up to
individuals, which will cause inconsistancies.
the proposal does not take in to account the global differences in sp
it isn't legit for what i have in my network though :-)
Gary E. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yo Joshua!
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Joshua Smith wrote:
i still get 8K plus hits against my acls per day for udp/1434...(75 in
the
time it took to write this email)
You are probably doing
Bryan Bradsby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udp/1434 is not a reserved port. [...] legit
traffic that picked a random port to use for an ad-hoc use.
it isn't legit for what i have in my network though :-)
i should clarify this - my data center has www/dns/ftp servers and a bunch
of voip
Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Worse, it only takes 1 infected host to re-infect the entire net in
about 10 minutes. So, the entire 'net has to cooperate, or we'll see
continual re-infection.
Only if people didn't fix
Bill Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, neal r wrote:
Voice over IP is a stinking, fetid swamp, and I suggest if anyone
feels compelled to waste money and feel pain while doing something
with telephones and the internet...
All I can say is, you
Simon Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon Jan 27, 2003 at 04:16:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, but why does it talk to the outside world unsupervised? Your
organization clearly has a border that separates its internal systems
from
external ones. Why not apply those
i am getting duplicates too -i thought it was just my mail service or
lack of coffee :-)
cw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else now had two copies of all the messages in this particular
thread? They came through ok the first time, now they're coming through again
slowly in reverse order
Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After last weeks spam run on Iraq, the US military and NIPC are
concerned Iraq might be behind a rise in electronic attacks
against government and military networks.
and we are supposed to have sympathy for those who struck the first
blow? rofl!
Networks with Free Software at NANOG 26.
Check it out here:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0210/ppt/stephen.pdf
-Wayne
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: free network monitoring
for my voip network/peers, i can withstand rtt's of around 600ms - granted
the quality sucks at that sort of latency, but data/ip routes into some
of the less-than-developed places in the world are crap at best, and any
phone is better than none
Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon,
and millions of others hacking at everything else...sounds like fear
mongering to me - guess we will probably be seeing a 'new' cyber security
bill soon
Dan Hollis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might be of interest:
Dale Levesque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
Attachment:
MIME Type: multipart/alternative
-
Does anyone in here now of a South Florida Network Operators Group, or
something similar, and if
hello to all,
i would appreciate your your knowledge and experiences regarding freely
available tools for network monitoring and management (all cisco now, some
other stuff later). i would prefer free tools as i have no budget :)
i am looking for the following (it will be running on either
Thomas Kernen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for the layout of the technical organisation within service
providers. Charts with role definitions, related and/or
critical processes, inter-departement communications, chain of command,
breakout within major units, relation between
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ladies Gentleman.
Was wondering if it is common for processor rates on higher end Crisco boxes
to race from 1 or 2 % show on the 5 second processor rate interval, to
anywhere from 70 to 90 %, instanteously, then drop back down to 1 or 2 %
Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A828-2002Oct22.html
The heart of the Internet sustained its largest and most sophisticated
attack ever, starting late Monday, according to officials at key online
backbone organizations.
Can
Ratul Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have related question to ron's (a bit hypothetical but interesting
nonetheless).
if isps charged for bgp announcements, would the number of announcements
that shouldn't be made (e.g., those due to configuration errors and poor
operational
Al Rowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only drop in 'traffic' I've ever noticed was in my former life in
the military. Retreat policy on base was that traffic pulled [cut]
i think i was lucky i never had a car while i was living on base :)
regarding the 'silence' yesterday - i was
25 matches
Mail list logo
