On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:54:14PM -0700, Henry Linneweh wrote:
And just when things looked dismal this had to happen
to make it more so
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1898-2004Jun24.html?referrer=email
http://bugmenot.com/view.php?url=washingtonpost.com
-Setzer
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes:
I agree, lack of interactive access to a system prior to a functional OS
being loaded always seemed like a potential problem area to me,
particularly for something
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:21:54PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
No true in many cases. All I have to prove is it's not the network and
then I hand it off to the windows/*nix/whatever sysadmins. To prove
it's not the network, I don't need to know the end systems in any sort of
detail.
