Have you called your ISP today?
On 4/16/08, Jake Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've sent repeated emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/com/*, no response yet.
There is an IRC DDoS bot on EFnet actively attacking users - and has
been for quite a while, as you can see from the signon date.
I
Yes, it is operational.
Best,
Marty
On 4/15/08, Fred Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But isn't this what nanog is for? It appears to be more on-topic than the
email threads. More E than S.
Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
Senior Network Engineer
Coleman Technologies, Inc.
Abuse desk is a $0 revenue operation. Is it not obvious what the issue is?
Some of the folks that are complaining about abuse response generate
revenue addressing these issues. Give me some of that. I'll give you
a priority line to the NOC.
Disclaimer; No offense intended to security
Folks,
Can we wrap the mail threads up or at least move them over to their
respective best-places like zorch, nsp-sec, spam-l, asrg, or
yet-another-favorite-list-for-spam-religion? We've gone far beyond
typical mass-mail operations.
Best Regards,
Marty
--
Martin Hannigan
Folks,
Same request as the Yahoo! Mail thread, can we go ahead and wrap this
up? Excellent points, intelligent positions, but definitely not
operational. This one might be great for ASRG, which has been a little
more active lately.
Best Regards,
Marty
--
Martin Hannigan
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:56 PM
To: Martin Hannigan
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: nanog volume (was: Problems sending mail to yahoo?)
Can we wrap the mail threads up
actually, i am still learning from some
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ clip ]
I heartily second this. Yahoo (and Hotmail) (and Comcast and Verizon)
mail system personnel should be actively participating here, on mailop,
on spam-l, etc. A lot of problems could be solved (and some avoided)
catch them, we'll act. We added some language related to that to
the new AUP and have been able to act on it as a result.
/nanog admin
--
Martin Hannigan http://www.verneglobal.com/
Verne Global Datacenters e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keflavik, Iceland
that I turned off the MX records. Every
now and then I turn them back on to see what's flowing and it never
changes. Within seconds.
[obOp] I think that the language change defeats many of the heuristics
found in common spam appliances.
--
Martin Hannigan http
Has this circuit ever run clean(normal)?
-M
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Brian Raaen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently having problems get upload bandwidth on a Sprint circuit. I am
using a full OC3 circuit. I am doing fine on downloading data, but uploading
data I can only
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites. Any one of a
number of affected or interested countries could have provided the imagery
(or ship information) to Reliance. Its not saying *who* analyzed the
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt we'll ever see the day when running gigabit across
town becomes cost effective when compared to running gigabit
to the other end of your server room/cage/whatever.
You show me the ISP with the majority of their
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:09 PM, bill fumerola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ disclaimer: i work for opendns. ]
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 05:53:15PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
[ snip ]
so, to recap:
nope, we don't sell NXDOMAIN data. we don't sell any other data either.
I don't think
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Steve Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
I wonder who he's paying for his nxdomain data, and whether that
someone is authorized to sell it. It strikes me that it's just a small
step for someone with access to ISP internal data to go from selling
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Barry Shein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this for real?
Someone asks a harmless question about setting up multiple default
routes, not about Barack Obama or whether the moon is made of green
cheese, but about default routes.
Then 10 people decide to
I think it's best that we let David Ulevitch and the crew @ OpenDNS make
the money that is to be made off this. He's doing good while doing well.
Why shouldn't anyone be able to make the money? The problem with
that post wasn't that he was advocating law breaking, it was that it's
a
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Ray Demain wrote:
We are looking to purchase NXDOMAIN data for an internet survey.
We prefer to receive the data on an hourly basis so it is as fresh as
possible. Our system receives the data from you via ftp that you provide.
Its hard to value the data
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Steve Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Ray Demain wrote:
We are looking to purchase NXDOMAIN data for an internet survey.
We prefer to receive the data
.
As discussed earlier in this thread, this is really the same old
song--it simply has a new verse now. (How many of our troubadors
know all of the verses since AS 7007?)
Best,
- -Martin
[0] http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/02/pakistan_hijacks_youtube.shtml
- --
Martin A. Brown --- Renesys
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clearly, they are incensed by youtube content, so what makes anyone
think that they would not be trying to engage in a case of Cyber-Jihad?
Let's avoid speculation as to the why and reserve this thread for
global
There's also some golf taking place, but it might be too late for this
NANOG. If you golf and attend NANOG drop me a line and we'll set you
up with the specifics. We're also close to being able to crertify a
PGA sanctioned club. ;)
Search Facebook for 'Internet Golf Society' and join for more
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:49 PM, K. Scott Bethke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this is off-topic frustration has set in. I've got what
looks like a routing loop or a wedge in your network and I cant get
past tier2 saying it is an internet problem. I asked to speak with
an engineer
,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
On Feb 5, 2008 7:33 PM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: Tue 2/5/2008 2:49 PM
To: John Lee
Subject: Jeanette Symons
Hi John,
You may remember me. I am Sasha Match. Steve Speckenbach was my late
Obviously, this was meant to be a private communication. My apologies
for cc'ing the nanog list, it was intended to follow the admins
procedure and go to nanog admins and respect the feelings of the
poster.
Best Regards,
Martin
On Feb 5, 2008 9:10 PM, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Marshall:
I don't see any cables for Lebanon. I also don't see any cable for
Syria. I see Falcon coming down an estuary on an edge border for
Jordan. In proximity, Israel has some redundancy, although I don't
have the granularity to strip out the specific cables. It looks like a
branch to me, a
On Feb 4, 2008 12:38 AM, Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Todd Underwood wrote:
there has has been a lot of speculation that this is all some US
prelude to war with iran. while i don't claim to know much about
whether that makes any sense, i do know that if
$quoted_author = Scott Francis ;
maybe there's a lot more overlap in shipping lanes and cable runs than
I thought ...
In confined waters like the Suez, Red Sea et. al. there is a lot of overlap.
Which makes three cables cuts in that area during bad weather not such a
stretch of the
On Feb 1, 2008 11:43 AM, Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's an interesting article at
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Internet-Outages-Cables.html
on cable chokepoints.
NEW YORK (AP) -- The lines that tie the globe together by carrying
phone calls and Internet
On Feb 1, 2008 2:25 PM, Ahmed Maged (amaged) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does look normal to me is far from a global conspiracy theory.
Thank you for the translation but I think you got it wrong.
I agree, there should be a sanity check as I understand that they are
within close proximity
Hi Michael:
On Feb 1, 2008 6:44 PM, Michael Painter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's at least one:
http://www.ofcc.com/procedures.htm
Yes, this is the idea.
My experience is that fisherman coops, similar to this one for network
operators, are contacted during the desk top study DTS phase
On Jan 31, 2008 4:30 AM, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\
I think more interesting is the landing stations where numerous cables
intersect. They may be diverse in the water, but they cluster around each
other when they hit the landing stations.
-Hank
They aren't that diverse
On Jan 31, 2008 11:20 AM, Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.kisca.org.uk/Web_SWApproaches.pdf
And if you enlarge the map, you can see little dots on the lines
representing the cables that denote repairs.
Lots and lots of repairs. Treacherous waters.
The distances are
On Jan 30, 2008 9:41 PM, Todd Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 01:56:42AM +, Paul Ferguson wrote:
For what its worth, Todd Underwood has a very good overview of the
countries affected by this outage over on the Renesys Blog here:
On Jan 31, 2008 2:08 AM, Paul Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Med/IO cable case, a ship dropped an anchor on the cable,
something that is 1:1,000,000 shot, but happens. [...]
Isn't
Folks, we'd like to ask that this thread die a quick and painful
death. It's gone off topic and it seems to have run whatever short
course that it tried. While what Europe does is interesting to us as
network operators, this is European policy and off topic for NANOG.
Best Regards,
Martin
$quoted_author = Tom Vest ;
Occasional rhetorical indulgences notwithstanding, I'm a pragmatist; an
ever-rising upper limit that 99% of the population never ever notices is
not much of a limit.
Sure it is. By knowing that no-one sharing the backhaul to the DSLAM at my
CO can afford to do
$quoted_author = Andy Davidson ;
I'm really happy for you to sell me some transit as long as I can peer with
you over MLP as well. Small commit. I agree to give you some of my
prefixes over the paid session, but I'm going to put all of my routes and
my customer's routes on the MLP.
$quoted_author = Andy Davidson ;
.. think about what happens when your customers' routes start appearing
through your MLP session as well.
Standard practice would be to localpref customer routes over peering routes.
Likely to result in assymetric routing as the customer prefers peering
$quoted_author = Randy Bush ;
Likely to result in assymetric routing as the customer prefers peering
routes over transit.
omg! asymmetric routing on the internet! world at eleven, end of news
predicted! :)
:)
This was basically setting up the next comment which was in relation to how
On Jan 15, 2008 3:52 PM, Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Greco wrote:
I have no idea what the networking equivalent of thirty-seven half-eaten
bags of Cheetos is, can't even begin to imagine what the virtual
equivalent
of my couch is, etc. Your metaphor doesn't really make
content if we're going to see these
requests forwarded to ~9k users.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
[Apologies for any duplicates...]
A quick reminder that the NZNOG 2008 conference is only two weeks
away now.
http://conference.nznog.org
We need to finalise numbers very shortly now, so go ahead and
register NOW if you intend to come and haven't already.
The largely-finalised
Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG Mailing List Committee
On Dec 30, 2007 9:42 PM, Michael Greb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've attempted to contact DreamHost NOC or Abuse departments via the
numbers in whois but just get voice mail and no call back.
I've got a user sending a lot of UDP traffic to
Hello Folks:
That would be a slip of the auto-completion function. I can't really
think of how to operationalize NYE so I'll have to apologize instead.
Sorry for the mis-directed email!
Best Regards and Happy Holidays,
Marty
On Dec 29, 2007 2:29 AM, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Ok folks, what's the plan? I think we should opt to join each others
company at either Brasserie Jo's, or Blu. I can't speak for Jo's NYE,
but Blu NYE has optional fireworks viewing on their deck facing the
common. Should be pretty awesome. $99 bux.
Significant others invited, of course, and
On Nov 20, 2007 3:11 PM, Alex Pilosov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:21:19 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their
customers can originate scam emails, but cox.net abuse
On Nov 20, 2007 2:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT000 Message Refused. A URL in the
content of your message was found on...uribl.com. For resolution
Dear Colleagues:
This morning, a new Acceptable Use Policy was posted on the NANOG website.
http://www.nanog.org/aup.html
Please be aware of it and note some significant changes. Much of the
language like discouraged was removed so that readers of the list
can interpret the AUP clearly vs.
On Nov 15, 2007 1:44 PM, Raymond L. Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Multiple outbound gateways have been having problems with the MXLogic
inbound servers over the past few days and the tier1 support
continues to say that our IP's are not on their blacklists and that
there shouldn't be anything
Folks,
A brief update.
The team at Merit has identified what is causing the mailer messages
to come back to the entire list. The admin team at Merit is working on
a solution. Please do continue to ignore the message. We'll update
again when there is a solution.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
On Nov 6, 2007 5:35 PM, Greg Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
Hmmm. When using IE 7 on Windows Vista out of the box, and I give it
a non-existent domain, it prompts me to connect to a network (even if
I'm already connected to one). It also puts the browser in work
offline mode.
ddos and surrounding tools and techniques.
The only thing I'd ask is that people don't branch off threads. It
messes up our killfiles. :-)
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
opening up such a topic as a free for
all is a recipe for disaster.
Spam-l is well established and accepts operators. Go west young man.
Otherwise, use your kill file, Luke.
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Memeber
On 10/30/07, William B. Norton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30-Oct-2007, at 12:55, Andy Davidson wrote:
I'm trying to understand your point here - you believe that it will be
a more
personally
i find prohibited to be unnecessarily strong.
sc hat on
looks pretty much as expected from meeting and discussion between sc and
mlc.
What do you see that's different from what the MLC initial vote
approved, what the community approved, and what you got?
these sorts of issues. Feel free to clue-by-four
me if I've missed it.
Hi Chuck,
Mail problems that are operational in nature are more than welcome
here. The politics and kookery of spam policy and fighting should be
directed elsewhere.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, we cannot provide you with
specific information other than to suggest a review
of the questionnaire we supplied and try to determine
where
On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Ulevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their
email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to.
[..and.. ]
You
On 10/25/07, Al Iverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/07, Weier, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any Hotmail/MSN/Live postmasters around?
My company sends subscription-based news emails -- which go to thousands of
users within Hotmail/MSN/Live. I appear to be getting blocked
On 10/16/07, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:03:36PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
ought to seriously consider disbanding the current evolution.
If that means the disbanding
On 10/14/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14-okt-2007, at 19:34, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Is this a configurable option for the inverse behavoir? Seems to me
that it should be since it affects the user experience and sets policy
for the network. It just may be, but I
On 10/15/07, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On 15/10/2007, at 8:24 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
[moresnip]
The way I read the portion of the thread related to resolver behavoir
was that the resolver behavior was being discussed
On 13 Oct 2007 15:47:16 +, Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Nice rant though :-)
agreed.
...
Does anyone have info on how bind (and other recursive resolvers)
select whether to use v6 or v4 if an NS points at a resource with both
On 10/12/07, Steve Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
(If some random dynamic IP host on the other side of the world
started hitting my firewall for no apparent reason, i'd be raising
my eyebrows too. Of course, these days, I have a much
On 10/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we determine what people do want to read vs. what they don't?
Do a survey.
We're going to.
-M
On 10/10/07, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably not feasible to do a non web forms based survey, but the list
users would be target. Lets be happy that one may get done at all. If
you dont have web, Ill call you and you and do it over phone.
On 10/8/07, Joe Provo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:11:17PM +0100, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
[snip]
i guess it could be 'character assassination' or 'political' which
are both against the AUP
[mild tangent: How can the blanket label of political be
off-topic given the
[ snip, nobody cares about Telstra or the embedded baiting ]
if it was just marty being on a piss off about me, then no big deal; i
can handle marty (and certainly am in no position to abuse him for being
hot-headed).
Hot-headed for what reason? Because you are off topic as usual? Not
quite.
. At Nordies,
you buy stuff and you don't negotiate the price. At Best Buy, you yell
open box! open box! and you get a 20% discount.
Best(not Buy),
Martin
On 10/8/07, Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 18:46 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Just so we're clear, you will continue to see requests to adapt to the
AUP wrt to being on topic. If you don't like that, you can certainly
seek to have me thrown off the MLC
On 10/9/07, vijay gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/8/07, Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Hannigan wrote:
How do we determine what people do want to read vs. what they don't?
It would be nice to have some direction. I don't mean from futures,
there's nobody really here
I suggest with the best intention possible that marty unwad his shorts
and the rest of us STFU and GBTW.
I'll add others to the list, but yes, in the simplest possible terms, this
thread was a ridiculous waste of time of everyone involved.
Well, Vijay can KMA, but point taken. My shorts
$quoted_author = Joe Greco ;
That's approximately correct. The true answer to the thought experiment
is address those problems, don't continue to blindly pay those costs and
complain about how unique your problems are. Because the problems are
neither unique nor new - merely
$quoted_author = Joe Greco ;
The real problem is the ability of users to adopt new killer apps. This
eventually breaks down to issues of how long is it reasonable for users
to fund that shiny telco network at $50/line/month and things like that,
because rather than solving the problems, it
OnForce http://www.onforce.com/. Thanks for your help.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG MLC Member
On 10/5/07, Darin Pesnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone on the list works for Comcast or could help me get
in touch with them to discuss the requirements for establishing a peering
relationship. So far our efforts to contact them have not resulted in
talking
user base, generate ad revenue to pay for it, and sell
services to others i.e. anti-fraud and anti-phishing.
Best,
Martin
Folks,
I'm receiving about 25K spams per minute with this subject:
Subject: Looking for Sex Tonight? Curtis Blackman
They randomize the name on the subject line. Is this any particular
virus/malware/zombie signature and any suggestion on how to defend
against it besides what
On 9/27/07, Raymond L. Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you check the source IP in the headers? My logs show that they are
coming from a buncha residential IP addresses so its prolly a bot
network doing it. Most of the messages going through our servers with
that have the domain
On 9/21/07, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On 9/15/07, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[spam: Check http://www.sixxs.net/misc/toys/ for an IPv6 Toy Gallery :)]
Somewhat long, hopefully useful content follows...
Barrett Lyon
On 9/15/07, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[spam: Check http://www.sixxs.net/misc/toys/ for an IPv6 Toy Gallery :)]
Somewhat long, hopefully useful content follows...
Barrett Lyon wrote:
[..]
[ clip ]
Of course when there is only a A or only that protocol will be
used. All
On 9/15/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15-sep-2007, at 21:25, Barrett Lyon wrote:
The other thought that occurred to me, does FF/Safari/IE have any
ability to default back to v4 if v6 is not working or behaving
badly? This could be a helpful transition feature but
On 9/17/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17-sep-2007, at 19:06, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Getting back to my original discussion with Barrett, what should we do
about naming? I initially though that segregating v6 in a subdomain
was a good idea, but if this is truly
On 9/17/07, Barrett Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a totally unrelated note: Not to make any accusation on the
security of the end-point tunnel network what-so-ever, but an
entirely other issue is the tiny bit of a security conundrum that
default tunnels create -- tunneling traffic to
On 9/15/07, Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15-sep-2007, at 21:25, Barrett Lyon wrote:
The other thought that occurred to me, does FF/Safari/IE have any
ability to default back to v4 if v6 is not working or behaving
badly? This could be a helpful transition feature but
On 9/15/07, Barrett Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you do the naming? Matching or unique?
Matched , I was thinking about doing a w6 or something more
unique for now, but that somewhat defeats the point.
I tried to do it in a round robin record based on the described
On 9/15/07, Barrett Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
We removed on our production hosts shortly after we deployed it,
our global v6 deployment goes production next week, at which time I
may re-add the to limited production. If we do this, I publish
a report of the stats
On 9/12/07, Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:36:45AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
This (the general subject of how to keep real-world cabinets tidy and
do cabling in a sane way) seems like an excellent topic for a NANOG
tutorial. I'd come, for sure :-)
This
On 8/27/07, Raymond L. Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing a lot of problems with about 8 of our outbound mail
gateways to the MSN/Live mail servers throughout the day. Are there any
mail/sysadmins on this list, or anyone that can get me in contact with
someone there,
I do have a volunteer from EFF...
I had mentioned that both VeriSign and Neustar have people that are
fluent in the
technical and general legal issues as well as the legal aspects. It
would seem to make more sense to solicit one of those organizations
since NANOG is about operations, and not
traffic to their own servers.
Which large European operator has implemented this solution? I would love
to see a talk at the next NANOG about how this works and how it performs.
Best Regards,
Martin
(Note: Article quote slightly out of context. I tried to keep it to
what may be on
topic
, but circleid.com resolves for me.
Best,
Martin
Dear Colleagues:
Anyone have a pointer to a list of regulations, or know off the top of
your head, related to data privacy at US ISP's? CALEA? CANSPAM? DMCA?
et. al.
Please reply off list and I will summarize responses back to the list
at a later date.
Best Regards,
Martin
On 3/13/07, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DNS operations
mechanics of voip
network instrumentation
ids/ips deployment
understanding flow/packet capture output
noc practices (monitoring/ticketing)
setting up a looking-glass
deploying load-balanced services
machine
On 26-Feb-2007, at 17:39, Jared Mauch wrote:
[ snip ]
We expect (empirically) a dip in the winter meetings, which I think
is illustrated by the numbers above (with Toronto and Salt Lake City
as outliers). The theory that is most frequently put forward to
explain the winter dip
On Feb 26, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
What reason would NANOG have for holding a meeting in DR? Not a lot
of context. DR is also in the LACNIC region. LACNIC has meetings
similiar to RIPE in content i.e. policy and ops.
http://lacnic.net/en/eventos/lacnicix/index.html
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:42:00PM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
One of the reasons why these spots are in the LACNIC region
is language. They don't speak english.
OH MY GHOD! HEATHENS! let's bomb them quickly.
We already did
seriously? my family in santo
How about a survey of the mailing list members to see what they think? -
Simon J. Lyall
Considering that this is a mailing list to supplement the NANOG meetings how
about if we restrict the poll participants to people who have attended a
NANOG in the last 12 months!
Ron,
Everyone
1 - 100 of 590 matches
Mail list logo
