Re: what the heck do i do now?

2007-01-31 Thread Paul Vixie
One thing you might consider is putting together a script to harvest email addresses from whois records that correspond to the PTR for the querying IPs. Add to that list abuse, postmaster, webmaster, hostmaster, etc @ the poorly run domain. Then fire off a message explaining the situation

Re: Colocation in the US.

2007-01-25 Thread Paul Vixie
How long before we rediscover the smokestack? After all, a colo is an industrial facility. A cellar beneath, a tall stack on top, and let physics do the rest. odd that you should say that. when building out in a warehouse with 28 foot ceilings, i've just spec'd raised floor (which i usually

Re: Colocation in the US.

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Vixie
, unless Eneco's chip works out in which case all bets are off in a whole lotta ways. -- Paul Vixie

Re: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Vixie
over three years? spread out over 50 network owners that's ~$3K a month. i don't see that happening in a consolidation cycle like this one, but hope springs eternal. give randy and hank the money, they'll take care of this for us once and for all. -- Paul Vixie

Re: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Vixie
all ears.) -- Paul Vixie

Re: Colocation in the US.

2007-01-24 Thread Paul Vixie
If you have water for the racks: we've all gotta have water for the chillers. (compressors pull too much power, gotta use cooling towers outside.) http://www.knuerr.com/web/en/index_e.html?products/miracel/cooltherm/cooltherm.html~mainFrame i love knuerr's stuff. and with mainframes or

Re: OT: How to stop UltraDNS sales people calling

2006-11-28 Thread Paul Vixie
% of all queries it receives? and i say, um, no, why do you ask? and the answer is always that's what the ultradns salesman told me. i can't argue with their success, but i guess i am ready to quibble over their manners. -- Paul Vixie

Re: OT: How to stop UltraDNS sales people calling

2006-11-28 Thread Paul Vixie
Hi Paul, just curious, someone over at UltraDNS called and told me my own bind server is dropping 20% of queries. Can you please explain to me how did they log into my systems? :-)

Re: register.com down sev0?

2006-10-25 Thread Paul Vixie
been spamming. and it may also be that they are out of compliance with RFC 2182. but that would be like catching al capone for income tax evasion just because you couldn't pin murder on him. (OPNs = Other People's Networks) -- Paul Vixie

Re: Aggregation path information [was: 200K prefixes - Weekly Routing Table Report]

2006-10-14 Thread Paul Vixie
16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area, covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Vixie

Re: tech support being flooded due to IE 0day

2006-09-22 Thread Paul Vixie
remove the ISC training ad from my .signature for this post, since i've gone way over my NANOG quota here -- three messages in 24 hours, oops.) -- Paul Vixie

fyi-- [dns-operations] early key rollover for dlv.isc.org

2006-09-21 Thread Paul Vixie
fyi: ---BeginMessage--- EARLY KEY ROLLOVER --- In light of the recently announced OpenSSL security advisory: RSA Signature Forgery (CVE-2006-4339), ISC has instigated an early rollover of the DLV Key Signing Key (KSK). ISC reccomends reconfiguration of resolvers to use the DLV KSK published on

Re: fyi-- [dns-operations] early key rollover for dlv.isc.org

2006-09-21 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Vixie) writes: EARLY KEY ROLLOVER --- In light of the recently announced OpenSSL security advisory: RSA Signature Forgery (CVE-2006-4339), ISC has instigated an early rollover of the DLV Key Signing Key (KSK). ISC reccomends reconfiguration of resolvers to use

Re: tech support being flooded due to IE 0day

2006-09-21 Thread Paul Vixie
Francisco Bay Area, covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Vixie

Re: tech support being flooded due to IE 0day

2006-09-21 Thread Paul Vixie
unbudgeted expense and as a secondary burn it will make real network problems harder to report. -- ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area, covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Vixie

Re: i am not a list moderator, but i do have a request

2006-08-14 Thread Paul Vixie
in the world is urgent to somebody somewhere. not everything that happens on the internet is urgent to everybody on nanog. there are too many topics (and too many botnets) for nanog to cover them all. -- Paul Vixie

i am not a list moderator, but i do have a request

2006-08-13 Thread Paul Vixie
not become one. nanog has other useful purposes. -- Paul Vixie

Re: SORBS Contact

2006-08-10 Thread Paul Vixie
want to read. Spam is manageable problem without the self appointed censors. Get over it and move on. damn. i've been trolled. sorry everybody. -- Paul Vixie

Re: mitigating botnet CCs has become useless

2006-08-02 Thread Paul Vixie
*do*. -- Paul Vixie

Re: mitigating botnet CCs has become useless

2006-08-01 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Weeks) writes: From: Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fm.vix.com/internet/security/superbugs.html ... I'd like to see ...jackbooted [US is implied in the text] government thugs...kicking in a door somewhere ... i apologize for writing so sloppily that you

Re: mitigating botnet CCs has become useless

2006-07-31 Thread Paul Vixie
. see http://fm.vix.com/internet/security/superbugs.html for details. -- Paul Vixie

myspace

2006-07-24 Thread Paul Vixie
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/5209496.stm

Re: final agenda for August 10th DA Workshop

2006-07-22 Thread Paul Vixie
-party: Dinner, hosted by the ISC. this is pizza and beer in the warehouse but it'll allow cross-pollination. -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

2006-07-06 Thread Paul Vixie
There is a new player on the block that I see more and more http://www.infoblox.com/company/ infoblox isn't new. i'm familiar with them since they use BIND as their DNS protocol engine, and are long time members of the ISC BIND Forum. i recently did colour commentary for an

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

2006-07-05 Thread Paul Vixie
of abnormally low DNS TTL? i'm not as much interested in whether a technology causes no problems for its operator as whether its cost:benefit is worthwhile to the internet community. -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

2006-07-05 Thread Paul Vixie
. pundits please note that the fancy thing i'm recommending sit perfectly on top of the non-fancy thing i'm recommending. -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Vixie
akamai's or ultradns's DNS GSLB services, that's for sure. -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

2006-07-02 Thread Paul Vixie
as an option, but they all describe session-level redirection and most recommend that (as i do) and some even say using dns for this is bad (as i do, but for different reasons.) -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

2006-07-02 Thread Paul Vixie
://www.tenereillo.com/GSLBPageOfShameII.htm. the references sections of those last three are particularly informative. -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

2006-07-01 Thread Paul Vixie
/current/msg00671.html -- Paul Vixie

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-14 Thread Paul Vixie
jargon. that's just bitterness, though. -- Paul Vixie

on topic?

2006-06-14 Thread Paul Vixie
The effect of Nanog is remarkable. All the hybrid cells became fully converted to embryonic stem cells, said Jose Silva of the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, who reported the findings in the journal Nature.

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-13 Thread Paul Vixie
can you say does not scale? Indeed. this is why we're trying to sign up some registrars, starting with alice's, who can send us blocks of keys based on their pre-existing trust relationships. -- Paul Vixie

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-13 Thread Paul Vixie
touch with the Real World!) to keep myself entertained. You may flame when ready, Gridley. isc depends on a lot of volunteers, i'm happy to hear of your availability and i assume that joao will also be happy to hear it when he catches up on [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Vixie

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-13 Thread Paul Vixie
... we're trying to sign up some registrars, starting with alice's, who can send us blocks of keys based on their pre-existing trust relationships. so a key roll or change of delegation requires two levels of human intervention to work? no. in the normal, non-DLV DNSSEC-bis

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-13 Thread Paul Vixie
thanks for actual technalia. i've also been warned that this isn't ops-related and told to move elsewhere. ( first, i suspect much of the confusion could come from your thinking that the place up on skyline is *the* alice's restaurant. *the* alice's restaurants are the ones in our own

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-12 Thread Paul Vixie
If Paul is present specifically and only for QA that pertains to subject matter with which he is knowledgeable, his presence helps the ops community. I have not seen any writings that indicate that Paul was at bg or bofs or other portions of the conference. i was at the BG, having first

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-12 Thread Paul Vixie
Is there a better way to have handled the situation? Perhaps. indeed, i should have registered as a speaker and sat behind joao while he spoke. The positive outcome of this issue is that we are discussing how to handle drop-ins (freebie conference attenders?). agreed, there's a salient

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-12 Thread Paul Vixie
Paul may be special ... nope. we're all just bozos on this bus.

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-12 Thread Paul Vixie
is http://www.isc.org/ops/dlv/. -- Paul Vixie

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-12 Thread Paul Vixie
dilute as to be powerless and therefore trustworthy, but still barely potent enough to operate a DLV zone. -- Paul Vixie

wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-11 Thread Paul Vixie
i intended to be present for the QA after joao's DLV talk but i was told that being there without having registered was rude. as i was exiting the room, i heard sam weiler at the QA mic repeating his prior comments as to how ISC should not be a DLV registry, and i saw mark kosters in line at

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

2006-06-11 Thread Paul Vixie
i intended to be present for the QA after joao's DLV talk but i was told that being there without having registered was rude. you were attending nanog without registering and paying? that is rude. have you offered to pay retroactively? that would be the honorable thing to do.

who runs http://www.networkthinktank.com/ ?

2006-06-09 Thread Paul Vixie
the web site and whois info are just about as completely anonymous as can be.

Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism

2006-04-11 Thread Paul Vixie
to allege that your intentional actions cost them money. (as opposed to your deliberate inaction, as in the case of denying service.) note, IANAL. but i've been sued by experts, and even stupid lawsuits cost a lot to answer/defend, and not all stupid lawsuits are provably frivolous. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism

2006-04-10 Thread Paul Vixie
. -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc

2006-02-26 Thread Paul Vixie
aren't subscribed and want to be. (There are about 50 folks on that list, which I'm calling critical mass for the purpose of starting the first real discussion over there.) -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc

2006-02-26 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Vixie) (hey, that's me!) writes: http://lists.oarci.net/mailman/listinfo/ ... (There are about 50 folks on that list, which I'm calling critical mass for the purpose of starting the first real discussion over there.) oops. 154 as of this morning, i guess i wasn't

Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc

2006-02-26 Thread Paul Vixie
/2006-February/author.html -- Paul Vixie

Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc

2006-02-26 Thread Paul Vixie
i'd writ: # speaking of which, f-root has about 35 nodes world wide, and about a third # to a half of them aren't reachable by udp/161, and the blockage is not in # our immediate neighbors but rather on transit paths. this is due to the # cisco snmp vulnerability five years or so ago.

Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc

2006-02-26 Thread Paul Vixie
# hum... i subscribed to this dns-operations@ list some days back as what? #in2.oarc:amd64# bin/list_members dns-operations | grep -i manning #in2.oarc:amd64# bin/list_members dns-operations | grep -i ep.net #in2.oarc:amd64# # and have yet to see any postings. i guess i'm not

anybody here from verizon's e-mail department?

2006-02-21 Thread Paul Vixie
last week i became unable to send mail to verizon users: Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host relay.verizon.net[206.46.232.11] said: 550 You are not allowed to send mail:sv18pub.verizon.net (in reply to MAIL FROM command) (the above was from me trying to ask [EMAIL

the great anti-virus conspiracy

2006-02-02 Thread Paul Vixie
today i saw http://209.59.135.198/threat-center/eset_threat_blog.php.

Re: Martin Hannigan

2006-01-26 Thread Paul Vixie
kids entertainment-level hyperbole any more. -- Paul Vixie

Re: is this like a peering war somehow?

2006-01-23 Thread Paul Vixie
guess which timescale harvard business school teaches american executives and politicians to think and act within?) -- Paul Vixie

is this like a peering war somehow?

2006-01-19 Thread Paul Vixie
proving once again that peering ratios only matter if the other guy's customers can live without your assymetric content, here are two articles i saw today via slashdot. what's interesting to me is whether bellsouth will be sued some time later by some other content provider for de-peering them

Re: DOS attack against DNS?

2006-01-17 Thread Paul Vixie
# Admitted, i did not notice the type/class difference. I responded as a knee # jerk reaction, and that is my mistake. on nanog@, the tradition is to send knee-jerk flames without having read the article you're replying to. it's our own little slice of usenet-like culture, still alive a decade

Re: DOS attack against DNS?

2006-01-17 Thread Paul Vixie
# Last saturday one of our Web server experienced a TCP SYN attck which make # the system down for four hours. It seems there is not a good solution which # could detect defend DoS traffic at any time. by definition, there will never be a single defense against all attacks. # So, to the class

Re: DOS attack against DNS?

2006-01-16 Thread Paul Vixie
toolbox makes us all unsafe, no matter how much or how little they may be using it this day/year.) -- Paul Vixie

Re: DOS attack against DNS?

2006-01-16 Thread Paul Vixie
customers ... -- Paul Vixie

Re: DOS attack against DNS?

2006-01-15 Thread Paul Vixie
client xx.xx.xx.xx#6704: query: z.tn.co.za ANY ANY +E class ANY has no purpose in the real world, not even for debugging. if you see it in a query, you can assume malicious intent. if you hear it in a query, you can safely ignore that query, or at best, map it to class IN. -- Paul Vixie

Re: DOS attack against DNS?

2006-01-15 Thread Paul Vixie
# class ANY has no purpose in the real world, not even for debugging. if # you see it in a query, you can assume malicious intent. if you hear it in # a query, you can safely ignore that query, or at best, map it to class # IN. # # er... i guess that is true, although the DNS does

Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?

2005-12-26 Thread Paul Vixie
at the court is reading any of it and they sincerely hope they never have to (i.e., that you'll settle out of court, probably because one side ran out of money.) s/\$25K/$250K/, but otherwise, yes. -- Paul Vixie

Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down

2005-12-21 Thread Paul Vixie
about all kinds of off-topic CB radio junk. ymmv, but isn't it inevitable? -- Paul Vixie

Re: who's receiving comvalid/bgpsentinel spam? (Re: BGP )

2005-12-15 Thread Paul Vixie
# your not the only one... do you think it's worth complaining, or is this another hey, you put your contact information out there, we're just using it, and the mail isn't spam, it's absolutely on-topic? spammer?

Re: classful routes redux

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Vixie
actually, no, I could compare a /48 to a class A. ...which makes the /32s-and-shorter that everybody's actually getting double-plus-As, or what? no, super *duper* A's. -- Paul Vixie

Re: open jabber server and conference room for nanog-arin meeting

2005-10-26 Thread Paul Vixie
will remain open until something bad happens, so feel free to register, create rooms persistent or otherwise, etc. -- Paul Vixie

open jabber server and conference room for nanog-arin meeting

2005-10-24 Thread Paul Vixie
in an unusual fit of effacacy, i brought up an open jabber server today and created a persistent conference room. i'm not a fan of the monolithic public jabber.org server. if you have a jabber account somewhere, you can join the conference room: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you don't have a jabber

Re: open jabber server and conference room for nanog-arin meeting

2005-10-24 Thread Paul Vixie
, srh, if someone asks a Q on jabber and you're not logged in, i'll spew it to the microphone (or somebody else will). -- Paul Vixie

Re: And Verio too? (was Re: Level3 problems)

2005-10-21 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Kruckenberg) writes: Authoritative sources report that Verio coincidentally had major problems last night also: we (isc) saw level(3) go away and come back. verio's been normal here though. -- Paul Vixie

Re: multi homing pressure

2005-10-19 Thread Paul Vixie
products. -- Paul Vixie

Re: multi homing pressure

2005-10-19 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Todd Vierling) writes: The customer wants redundancy. That's why SLAs exist. no. sla's exist because actuarial tables and lawyers and accountants exist. -- Paul Vixie

Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)

2005-10-18 Thread Paul Vixie
# True enough, but unfortunately, it's not done in a way that we can make # use of the identifier in the routing subsystem or in the transport # protocols. # # The transport protocols, well they generally act on behalf of something # which can do the lookup and supply transport with right

Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)

2005-10-17 Thread Paul Vixie
runway. -- Paul Vixie

Re: IPv6 news

2005-10-16 Thread Paul Vixie
# but when similar things were proposed at other meetings, somebody always # said no! we have to have end-to- end, and if we'd wanted # nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4. # # Is VJ compression considered a violation of the end-to-end principle? # # Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet

Re: IPv6 news

2005-10-16 Thread Paul Vixie
# The problem with that (and many premises) is that we need to remember these # arguments and foreseen problems were all dreamed up 10 or so years ago. # The status of everyone's network, everyone's business needs and everyone's # network design (and capabilities) were drastically different that

Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)

2005-10-16 Thread Paul Vixie
# ... # # Obviously, some of the disadvantages of such an approach would be that it # would require both ends to play and end users wouldn't be able to # traceroute. I'm sure there are many other disadvantages as well. ... ok, so here's the problem. we don't have what the iab thinks of as

Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)

2005-10-16 Thread Paul Vixie
# ... # # You are missing the point. # # Currently multihomed sites have multiple path entries in the routing table # for a specific multihomed prefix. # # Instead of having multiple paths, you would have multiple location records # in DNS. (Which are A records and any possible reordering by

Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news)

2005-10-15 Thread Paul Vixie
# if all you've got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. # # I guess the question was what is the problem IPng was supposed to solve? that depends on who you ask. the pet problem i was dealing with at the time was the necessary evil called CIDR. necessary because infinite routing

Re: IPv6 news

2005-10-15 Thread Paul Vixie
quickly. What were the reasons for rejection? i wasn't there for that meeting. but when similar things were proposed at other meetings, somebody always said no! we have to have end-to-end, and if we'd wanted nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4. -- Paul Vixie

Re: IPv6 news

2005-10-14 Thread Paul Vixie
0.543 -0.017 0.043 +Time10.Stupi.SE .GPS.1 u 12 64 3775.333 -0.471 0.039 -- Paul Vixie

Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news)

2005-10-14 Thread Paul Vixie
be talking about something else by now. as it is, the shim6 complexity penalty is even higher, and i don't think we'll ever get to stop talking about this problem. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution)

2005-10-10 Thread Paul Vixie
? -- Paul Vixie

Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering (philosophical solution)

2005-10-09 Thread Paul Vixie
side exceeds their cost. Yea, verily. But I don't think you'll find a one-cost-fits-all model. When one person's costs are lower than another and they're doing similar things, it's often called efficiency or competitiveness. (Just as one example.) -- Paul Vixie

Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

2005-10-08 Thread Paul Vixie
bgp. see http://www.google.com/search?client=safarirls=en-usq=vixie+multihoming+without+bgpie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8 if you're wondering how long we've been fiddling around with THAT tune here. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

2005-10-08 Thread Paul Vixie
aspirations. they'll remain connected to the riskier ISP's no matter what the riskier ISP's are doing to each other this week. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

2005-10-07 Thread Paul Vixie
was a bad idea, and we should push forward with one AS per end-site and a global routing table of 500 million entries? -- Paul Vixie

Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering

2005-10-07 Thread Paul Vixie
-- my employer has friendly relations with both Level(3) and Cogent. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Cogent move without renumbering

2005-10-07 Thread Paul Vixie
isn't. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)

2005-10-07 Thread Paul Vixie
and multilateralism. (ain't it great?) -- Paul Vixie

Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)

2005-10-06 Thread Paul Vixie
other issues being equal) is one provider in a better position than the other? If it's still common for one to be billed only for highest of in vs. out then there's no way to compare the benefits since there's always a shadow direction and it won't be symmetric among flow endpoints. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Paul Vixie serving ORSN

2005-09-30 Thread Paul Vixie
is only getting started.) -- Paul Vixie

Re: Paul Vixie serving ORSN

2005-09-30 Thread Paul Vixie
# It is *not* the same as what you've been advocating. # # indeed, it is not. ... # # I don't get this. You pretend there is a difference between ICANN / VeriSign # / US-DoC and universal IANA namespace. They are one and the same. you must have misread me. see http://fm.vix.com/ today.

Re: Paul Vixie serving ORSN

2005-09-30 Thread Paul Vixie
# you must have misread me. see http://fm.vix.com/ today. # # I've read it. Twice now. I'd like some help on what part I've misread ? i'm indifferent to their reasons, as long as they don't add any new TLD's... # I don't think the independence argument holds, as explained by my previous #

Re: Paul Vixie serving ORSN

2005-09-30 Thread Paul Vixie
# I understood that you're indifferent to _their_ reasons. I'm curious about # _your_ reasons. Solely to learn and for the stats? I couldn't deduct that # from fm.vix.com. internet governance ain't what it will be. anyone who wants to keep name universality in place as the system evolves, can

Re: Paul Vixie serving ORSN

2005-09-30 Thread Paul Vixie
# Paul, if we ever get DNSSEC deployed, what will/should OSRN return for # # dig ns . # # --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb i don't know ORSN's plans. i believe that the standard testbed methodology (and bill manning would be the one to correct me here,

Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers

2005-09-28 Thread Paul Vixie
PS. Is there some sort of secret net.kook cabal which I was not aware of? i thought this (nanog) was it. maybe i'm not in the loop, though. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers

2005-09-27 Thread Paul Vixie
universality would be worse than lack of naming autonomy. -- Paul Vixie

Re: Turkey has switched Root-Servers

2005-09-27 Thread Paul Vixie
things along the way? Paul Vixie has given very good arguments. did i? did you read them? did you read the part where i said: | ... thus there's plenty of money and power ready to back the next | hair-brained scheme to break the lock, even if (as i expect) lack of | naming universality would

Re: DNSSEC in public

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Vixie
. and do remember to look at jacco's www.dnssec.net pages; he (wisely) does not delve into the root zone's political problems or the DLV controversy, but otherwise his site is a very complete and useful reference. -- Paul Vixie

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >