On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
How about state-of-the-art routing security?
The problem is what is the actual trust model?
Are you trusting some authority to not be malicious or never make a
Ran across this at Wired today, and it seemed apropos to recent events:
http://www.wired.com/culture/art/multimedia/2008/01/gallery_simon?slide=10slideView=10
I particularly liked the photographer's observation: There's a humor
because the cables are so important, yet they look so unguarded and
On Feb 1, 2008 6:37 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/third-undersea-cable-reportedly-cut/story.aspx?guid={1AAB2A79-E983-4E0E-BC39-68A120DC16D9}
We had another cut today between Dubai and Muscat three hours back.
The cable was about
On Feb 1, 2008 2:35 PM, Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not at all, there have been cables in the water since 1858 (first
TransAtlantic cable - telegraph). Right now there are 80 major cables out
there.
Give yourself 170 years of undersea cables and calculate the odds.
:)
hm. I
On Jan 24, 2008 6:10 AM, Scott McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a similar system based around Cisco's CNR which is a popular
DHCP/DNS system used by large ISP's and other large organization and it
is the IP+Timestamp coupled with the owner to MAC relationship which
allows unique
On Jan 2, 2008 12:32 PM, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any experience with software that will track both IPv4 and
IPv6 assignments in the OSS world? Any recommendations?
we've been using IPPlan http://iptrack.sf.net/ recently and have
been pretty satisfied with it
On Jan 4, 2008 1:31 PM, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Francis wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 12:32 PM, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any experience with software that will track both IPv4 and
IPv6 assignments in the OSS world? Any recommendations?
we've been
looks like across the board availability problems (from keynote's POV
anyway) ... anybody have details? master ticket? ETA?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key
On 9/25/07, Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ARIN has set up a wiki at http://www.getipv6.info to publish
information that will help ISPs, large and small in implementing
IPv6 and migrating to an IPv6 Internet.
It might be worth syncing up with the people who are working on
On 8/16/07, Rod Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How much is power as a percent of data centre operating expense? What sort
of a range do you see?
We are building a high capacity cable to Iceland, which has already become
a major aluminum smelting centre due to its cheap geothermal and
On 7/29/07, Peter Dambier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ways have been found to drill holes into NAT-routers and firewalls,
but they are working only as long as it is only you who wants to break
out of the NAT. As soon as the mainstream has only left rfc 1918 addresses
p2p will stop.
really?
am receiving word that Cogent has been the victim of hardware
problems on our backbone causing latency and packet loss to customers
on the east coast. I did manage to get a master ticket number
(608503), but I'm curious if anybody out there (perhaps an actual
Cogent customer) has more details -
good luck with that :)
On 7/26/07, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What (if any) are the legal implications of taking internet destined
traffic in one country and egressing it in another (with an ip block
correctly marked for the correct country).
On 9/2/05, Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
packet inspection will just evolve, thats the nature of this problem.. there
are
things you can find out from encrypted flows - what the endpoints and ports
are,
who the CA is. then you can look at the characteristics of the
On 8/3/05, Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We should all be looking to the security auditing work done by
the OpenBSD team for an example of how systems can be
cleaned up, fixed, and locked down if there is a will to do so.
Beer, unsupported
elsewhere (and I'm
sure the points on both sides have already been beaten to death.)
respectfully,
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527
CaffeineHead We have enough youth. What we need is a fountain of smart.
-- http://bash.org/?70562
pgp0wcB3T051G.pgp
Description
surveilance capabilities,
they get ripped up, down and sideways for asking...
they don't need more surveillance capabilities as much as they need to better
utilize what they've already got. More laws aren't the answer to lack of
success enforcing what's already on the books.
--
Scott Francis
...
(that said, I absolutely agree that more crypto everywhere, for both
important and trivial traffic, is essential to reducing the unusual nature
of such traffic. Crypto should be the default, not the exception.)
/wishful thinking
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net
page at level3.com so far ...
thanks,
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527
Less and less is done
until non-action is achieved
when nothing is done, nothing is left undone
than to mysteriously fix itself
...)
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527
Less and less is done
until non-action is achieved
when nothing is done, nothing is left undone
to be running fine.
I'm seeing packet loss at LAX and SJC both (seems to be one and then the
other, back and forth).
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you have elected the way
of pain! -- Saruman, speaking
.
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you have elected the way
of pain! -- Saruman, speaking for sysadmins everywhere
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
And if she's like my mom, she'll be in the aisle in the computer store
(well, the big box electronics store, more realistically) and be like Why
should I pay $2000 for this one when I can get 'a computer' for $500? [1]
Buy her an eMac. $700.
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:37:09PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been wondering lately, after about 10 years of email worms spreading in
exactly the same manner with every incarnation ... why do you think people
haven't learned not to open
financial cost to business, and I heard this
latest one mentioned at least 3 times from various non-Internet media outlets
yesterday, so public awareness isn't the probem either.)
--
Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly
until I found somebody that used more reliable tools.
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
are exacerbated by
lack of knowledge and experience). This is not what I would qualify as a
level of damage too little to bother with.
Shoulda bought them a Mac last year ...
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
at MS, who are really the only people with the
ability to make this happen. Without their compliance, the problem will never
improve (not as long as they're as dominant as they currently are).
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
Top posting self-reply: looks like a lot of what I've suggested may have
finally been acknowledged by MS, according to a recent Register.co.uk
article.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/33599.html
We can only hope ...
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum
This kind of vitriol on a public list is immature at best. Please take it
elsewhere.
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 08:46:43AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip]
What aliases?
Unless the aliases
.).
This ringing a bell for anyone else?
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 03:06:30PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Scott Francis wrote:
I don't know if it qualifies as an established standard, but ISTR that
Steve Bellovin had a paper about various levels of reliability in data
centers ... [searches] argh. I can't
a partial attempt is better than
none at all.
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, month after month, without seeming to realize it.)
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://darkuncle.net/microsoft_rant.html
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
:$2.6 Billion
Klez: $9 Billion
SirCAM: $1 Billion
Estimated Total TCO:$16.2 - 28.6 billion
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
will
only frustrate end-users or bog down the network or both.
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. There is no tool sufficiently safe as to prevent abuse, and
yet still be useful. Or more succinctly, Nothing is foolproof to a
sufficiently talented fool.
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
would eliminate a _huge_ chunk of
wasted bandwidth and much of the administrative hassle of operating an SMTP
server.
*sigh*
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that disappeared a few minutes ago, and then
reappeared after about 7 minutes or so. *shrug*
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
at work is, A browser is not much of a diagnostic tool.
Use something that generates a meaningful error message. (use dig(1), `telnet
host 80`, traceroute, etc.) If you have already used these tools, my
apologies; your first post was a little short on details.
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle
that it was 557 lines, so I'll just post an
url: http://www.darkuncle.net/aggis )
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
being a
customer and sharing an office with a beta tester. :))
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Comments?
(Nice to see Mr. Bellovin keeping up the holiday tradition ... :))
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
especially with some of the recent posts.
Perhaps clueful folk should sneak off and form nanog-clueful mailing list ;)
Please don't; there are many of us lurking who are learning a great deal from
listening in on the conversations of the clueful.
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot
Schneier had to say in the most
recent crypto-gram regarding this hole.
http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0303.html
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:55:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Francis writes:
Fun is about all it comes to. See what Schneier had to say in the most
recent crypto-gram regarding this hole.
http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0303.html
finds little else in marketing. :)
--
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:27:46AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 18:06:47 -0800 Scott Francis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure
they'll move to a newer version when somebody on the team gets a chance
to give it a thorough code audit, and run
...)
Koji
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg08756/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:47:30AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Scott Francis wrote:
He argued instead that OSes should be redesigned to implement the
principle of least privilege from the ground up, down to the
architecture they run on.
[...]
The problem
correlation, AT ALL, between the ssh key admin model
and the principle of least privilege. They were two separate topics that just
happened to be discussed in the same posting.
This is my last post in this thread; further flames should be directed
offlist.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle
at least prevent
casual/automated network scans. Of course, if one was implementing proper
filtering, 1434/udp wouldn't be accepting connections from outside sources,
whether directly or through NAT/port forwarding. But then, this observation
has been made many times already ...
--
-= Scott Francis
in this area before, but that
doesn't make it any less pertinent.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg08631/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
year after year.
/rant
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg08638/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, of MANY large software vendors with regards
to security. It just doesn't matter to them, and that will not change until
they have a reason to care about it.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet
on the team gets a chance to give it a thorough code audit, and run
it through sufficient testing prior to release.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg08641/pgp0.pgp
to have an answer to
that question. :)
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg08646/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:00:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott Francis writes:
There's a difference between having the occasional bug in one's software
(Apache, OpenSSH) and having a track record of remotely exploitable
vulnerabilities in virtually
to distribute the load, rather than look for a more expensive
single point of failure. Of course, this is not currently backed up by much
personal operational experience, so take that with a grain of salt. :)
Thank you very much.
cheers,
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
matching
rule decides what action is taken.
Does this not constitute rule-based filtering? Or am I misunderstanding you?
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg08084
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 05:53:28PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--On 09 December 2002 08:39 -0800 Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
*cough*OpenBSD*cough*
I've had lots of people off-list me to say how wonderfully secure X Y or Z
OS distribution is. I am quite sure
, and still coming. Rather annoying.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg06800/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:49:28AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 3 October 2002, at 12 h 23,
Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure how applicable it may be, but the OpenBSD FAQ has referenced (since
at least 2.7) a paper called Understanding IP Addressing that I
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:48:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Scott Francis wrote:
Can you back up that statement in /any/ way? What exactly are your reasons
why sudo is a worse solution (or even a bad idea)?
In an environment where every sysadmin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:57:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Scott Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:48:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In an environment where every sysadmin is interchangable, and any one
of them can be woken up at 3am to fix
very easily get to a point where it is hard to know
just who currently has the password to the username root account.
(Fundamentally, all the arguments agains normal users sharing passwords
apply with even more force to passwords for privileged accounts.)
Kent
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle
on anybody encouraging it. See
(mail client sent message while I was editing it; full reply on its way.)
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg05726/pgp0.pgp
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:43:41PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:44:34PM -0700, Scott Francis wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:22:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have question for the security community on NANOG.
What is your learned
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:06:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[ On Wednesday, October 2, 2002 at 11:47:12 (-0700), Scott Francis wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Security Practices question
Absolutely so - which is why no account should have multiple equally valid
passwords, which is what
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:08:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[ On Wednesday, October 2, 2002 at 13:26:15 (-0700), Scott Francis wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Security Practices question
grr. Please read Barb's post about exactly why multiple aliases for the
UID 0 account is a Bad Idea. It's
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg05570/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
% of things
required to stop spam. If people would just take even the most basic of steps
required to block spam, the picture would improve drastically for all of us.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet
this discussion is proving useful to the OP.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg05423/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
a certain threshold, it will run much more smoothly than if it's examining
the contents of each packet.
However, I also like the idea of doing a bandwidth budget on a
per machine basis, with short term bursts allowing for most normal
activity.
*nod*
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle
has numbers on this, I'd be interested in hearing them one way or
the other.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg05427/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
like they took down the hate mail page, which was
hysterical. *sigh* They target clueful users only, and seem to be getting by
just fine. http://www.flex.com/adsl/ has a bit more of the intelligent users
only pitch.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has
stop protesting about those that make the
effort to do so. There are a great many good reasons to do so, and no good
reasons not to. Broken software and laziness don't count.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 03:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Scott Francis wrote:
There are a great many good reasons to do so, and no good
reasons not to. Broken software and laziness don't count.
Sure there are. Non-repudiation is not always a good thing. Do you get every
. Otherwise, there are no problems (well, very few anyway)
that I am aware of in using a single IP to host as many vhosts as physical
resources will allow.
I'm quite certain somebody will correct me if I've missed something. :)
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key
MIME standards.
I'm willing to accept a bit of annoyance in order to promote standards
compliance. If only Microsoft was thus motivated.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
(and was it _really_ necessary to post a hex dump of the entire thing? The
actual source is available linked from the BUGTRAQ post above ...)
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
-
| /usr/local/bin/formail \
-i Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign
}
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg03563/pgp0.pgp
Description
to be worth the ill will garnered. Just my opinion, of course.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg03060/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, and there is an irc-like encrypted chat called
silc.
You may also want to examine one of the several IRC hacks that incorporate
SSL. The one I occasionally visit is suidnet http://www.suidnet.org.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked
. That last may be bsd only, but
the first two ... ugh. I haven't done this much patching in a week in memory.
Beats the alternative, I suppose.
--
-= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =-
GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527
illum oportet crescere me autem
. If the phone network is down too, a cell phone
may also be important.
There's no substitute for an actual face-to-face conversation, either.
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG
) to read Email on MS OutLook from an Exchange server :-(
The MUA someone may have to use has nothing to do with whether or not that
person possesses experience with UNIX and standard UNIX utilities.
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network
list E-mail on machines that have
procmail on them ?
So because it is not applicable in all situations, it's not worth mentioning?
Procmail works for a good share of those reading this list, I'd wager.
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network
-) wasted bandwidth; I have no other way
to contact the person in question.
Yes, I realize this just generated another auto-reply. *sigh*
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG
you senseless. (awaiting stories to the
contrary now ...)
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7 illum oportet crescere me autem minui
:30 EDT.
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7 illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg02309/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:16:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip]
Nice list. Can we sort by helpful/clueful/relevant postings, and ask the
top 10 to post more frequently? :)
(OTOH, suspect I would quickly drop down out of the top 100 ... =\ )
--
Scott Francis darkuncle
to be
interdisciplinary, but I suspect it will take some time before it becomes
known and trusted. http://www.sagecert.org
Of course, if you're not really a systems administrator, it may not apply to
you ...
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 11:46:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[ On Saturday, May 18, 2002 at 20:15:10 (-0700), Scott Francis wrote: ]
Subject: Re: portscans (was Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product)
Apologies; my finger was a bit too quick on the 'g'. As this message came
by far.
This is what I have been (unsuccessfully) attempting to state. I apparently
need more practice in being coherent. :)
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key
into idolaters?
What is it that turns the decision of an individual network operator into a
rant about political ideology?
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7
Niemoller, 1945)
--Mitch
NetSide
--
Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7 illum oportet crescere me autem minui
msg01971/pgp0.pgp
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 05:25:27PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[ On Saturday, May 18, 2002 at 13:48:27 (-0700), Scott Francis wrote: ]
Subject: Re: portscans (was Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product)
However a portscan is not an attack.
Precursor to an attack, certainly.
B.S
And why, pray tell, would some stranger be carrying a concealed gun if
they were not planning on shooting someone?
/sarcasm
Show me how to defend myself from attack by portscanning the networks of
random strangers, and I will concede the point. :)
--
Scott Francis darkuncle
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo