Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Clearly, they are incensed by youtube content, so what makes anyone
think that they would not be trying to engage in a case of Cyber-Jihad?
Because this usually doesn't work very well, is very evident, and easily
fixed? Even on a sleepy Sunday, it took 3491 about two
- and
enable small ASes to grow.
The converse can also be true - we have a number of members who use the
IX fabric as a backup to their PIs with larger peering partners. If you
lose a PI carrying a GE of traffic, where does that traffic go?
--
Will Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED
I've got a link that is testing out at 29.5db loss @ 1550. Its 107km.
Shoot me a few suggestions?
http://www.finisar.com/product-113-1_Gigabit_CWDM_GBIC_with_APD_Receiver_(FTR-1619-xx)
30dB. Will do more, we've done ~180km (~36dB) with one of those.
Joe Provo wrote:
An obvious catalyst was commercialization of domains. Which
interestingly enough leads us back to the lack of categories and
naming morass in which we live. I find it quite humourous that
new 'restrictive membership' branches of the tree are now being
proposed as a
Jo Rhett wrote:
Oh, yes. Because BCPs are so very good at solving problems.
I wanna go live in your happy universe. Because if BCP 38 were attended
to more than 40% of my job would be irrelevant, and 12-15% of our
traffic load would be reduced.
...one of the only colocation providers who
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
England really needs more data centres to locate well away from London,
closer to power generation sources.
Perhaps s/England/The UK/ (our Scottish, Welsh and NI countrymen run
bits of the internet too ;) ).
The real issue is not power. This seems like a
sees people deploying jumbos out there is
storage. Selling storage as well as transit over the IX? It could happen :-)
--
Will Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Director
LONAP Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to admit that I have no idea how BT charges
ISPs for wholesale ADSL. If there is indeed some kind
of metered charging then Internet video will be a big
problem for the business model.
They vary, it depends on what pricing model has been selected.
Mike Lyon wrote:
Howdy. Please excuse the semi-offtopic post. My company is looking for
bandwidth at the location below before Christmas. So that pretty much
rules out your standard leased-line options. Leased line looks to be
about 60 days out or so.
Does anyone know of any MAN (or anything
Todd Underwood wrote:
nice commentary, rodney. useful.
one additional fact is relevant here: at it's peak, boeing connexion
employed over 670 people (mike hughes pointed me to the nubmer and i
can't find the link).
It is an astonishing number, was over 750 at it's peak.
Robert Sherrard wrote:
How many of you are currently cooling 7kW+ per cabinet.. are any of you
cooling more than 15kW per rack, if so how large is your footprint? Are
any of you using water cool racks, by tapping into house water?
We are cooling 15KW/rack for high performance computing
Unless I am mistaken, h.gtld-servers.net is offline and has been for an hour or
two. I can't see the containing prefix, 192.54.112.0/24.
Joe Abley wrote:
I think you're mistaken about the server being off-line, since I can see
it just fine from many places. The RIPE NCC dnsmon tool can also see it
from its various probes:
http://dnsmon.ripe.net/dns-servmon/server/?server=h.gtld-servers.netshow=SHOW
That's old data. This is a
Mehgan Laveck wrote:
[Ebay woes]
There seem to be some thoughts as to akamai being the possible culprit,
specifically as it interacts with Linux. I'm hoping a few of you Linux
users out there will give it a shot, telnetting to port 80 on these IPs
several times to see if you can get a
Randy Bush wrote:
the only stuff that makes me feel at all safe is what mike hughes
of linx described, or something even stricter, but i bow to mike's
experience.
and folk wonder why the grown-ups use pnis for anything important.
Isn't this due to the fact their engineering scale is bigger?
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4704359.stm
Mobile phone networks are bearing the weight of calls once more as news of four
blasts across London spreads.
It's a shame they're just plain wrong - I was getting consistent call failures
on two mobile
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:20:44AM -0400, Wayne Chow wrote:
We are in the process of planning for the upgrade of a 3Com network.
The new infrastructure will be comprised of 3Com 4950s with XRN and a dozen
stacks of 4400s.
What are the best practices of testing the new implementation? Any
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:21:06AM -0700, Dan Lockwood wrote:
I'm in a debate with a guy over the use of 'ip address x.x.x.x s.s.s.s
secondary' on Cisco gear. I seem to remember reading that the use of
secondary addresses is a bad idea, but I can't recall the details of
why. Process
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:39:18AM -0700, Greg Schwimer wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with GBIC-based CWDM and/or DWDM optical
add/drop muxes (OADM)? I'm presently looking at the Cisco product lines
which combines GBICs with passive multiplexors and am curious as to
alternative
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 07:30:53AM -0700, Eastgard, Tom wrote:
Is content filtering something ISPs are looking at or already doing?
A few do but generally most implementations I've seen use some form of
filtering firewall/proxy with an external database (Watchguard etc).
Schools internet is
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 01:29:29AM -0500, Andrew Dorsett wrote:
This is a topic I get very soap-boxish about. I have too many problems
with providers who don't understand the college student market. I can
think of one university who requires students to login through a web
portal before
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:13:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of 1U - 2U form factor Ethernet switches that can
handle 4K VLANs, or at a minimum 2000 VLANs? Note that we're
specifically looking for the ability to handle this number of VLANs
operating simultaneously,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:39:05PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
This is interesting, what problems did you run into?
We have an extensive Extreme networks used both for L2 and L3, and apart
from the fact that it always cpu routes ICMP, I see no major flaw in the
L3 forwarding function
On Thursday 28 August 2003 22:00, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
I saw it on CNN but it sounds like it wasnt as bad as they wanted to make
out.. frmo what I was told none of the major colos which are all in the
East lost utility and I dont know about stuff in the South which is where
the power was
24 matches
Mail list logo
