On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Rizzo Frank wrote:
John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
Sorry Paul, I guess you don't understand how those TLDTAG records
work.
Sorry John, I guess you don't understand how Internet naming works.
There is one true root file, and it's not yours.
I guess the moon
Prediction:
Bankruptcy filing to lose the restated 5 quarters, followed by
emergence and prosperity. sarcasm After all, isn't the saving of
fraudulent transactions made by suffering telecoms the whole prupose of
today's bankruptcy courts? /sarcasm
Operationally, I believe
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, JC Dill wrote:
On 06:45 PM 6/20/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work goddamn
hard keeping my corner crispy white, but the crispy whites are invisible when
it comes to sales time.
Perhaps you should help the sales department position this important data
in
As a person who actively works an abuse department...
We need to remember that while lots of folks will scream like banshees at the
reciept of a single email, very few (none that I know of personally) will
help a place *stay* white hat by voting with their wallets to support the
killing of
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, J.D. Falk wrote:
But spamcop's in specific is still based on spamcop user
complaints, and most of the spamcop user complaints I've seen
have been grossly mistargetted.
How? I find spamcop to be very reliable, and the basis of many actions.
--
ramble
You hit it dead on: use all the tools at your disposal, but preemptively
whitelist your customers. Unfortunately, the whitelisting isn't always as
easy as it sounds. If they are within your IP space, you're good to go, but
if they have the rare portable block, or they are multihomed,
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Eric A. Hall wrote:
Uh, thanks. The government has all kinds of property protection laws. My
mail spool is my property. Do the math.
Your car is your private property as well, but if you park it in a public
place, with the engine running, and offer every passerby the
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
We're trying to discourage bulk emailers, not individuals.
Then the way to do this is to make the cost of sending mass mail more
expensive than sending only a few here and there. In short, we need a way to
prevent the use of the $19.95
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about something along the lines of dial accounts having their outgoing
SMTP connections rate limited to, oh, let's say 100 per day, and limiting the
maximum number of recipients on any
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True DDoS attacks, fortunately, are rarer than most people believe. If they
were not, the Internet as we know it would look a lot more like a telephone
system in USSR-at-it's-worst-days.
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Deepak Jain wrote:
Is it really hard to believe that the Chinese government would actively fund
cyberterrorism?
Deepak Jain
AiNET
No harder than it is to believe that the US Govt would actively fund
[cyber]terrorism...
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Art Houle wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:51:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Art Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pete Kruckenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Myth of Five 9's Reliability (fwd)
How to calculate uptime and get 5 9s
-do not
NickCatal I think we can make money offering gig-e at the cost of a T1
I'll take two :-)
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Conrad A. Rockenhaus wrote:
snipped
NickCatal naa.. my job in the new company is to make ideas and provide a
public face to the company.. a 14 year old selling enterprise hosting
looks good on Leno
Come on now, he's one of those 14 year old wonder kids that will
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Mark Kent wrote:
Has anyone ever had any experiences with calpop.com for
colocation services?
Are they Savvis, or just pretending to be Savvis:
They are a stand-alone Savvis customer. I am not certain if they are
multihomed at this time.
a) the contact for
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of the Tier 1s who is the best to use ?
Thanks.
Please don't feed the trolls...
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Anne Marcel Roorda wrote:
Having a support model in which anyone can call any NOC about a
problem they're having does not scale very well.
How about a model where any large (multiple OC12s) CUSTOMER can call a NOC
about a problem they're having???
--
Yours,
J.A.
17 matches
Mail list logo
