Joseph Jackson wrote:
I'm pretty new to the networking world. While I don't run a huge and
complex network in a service provider market. We're just an enterprise
network. I have read a lot of useful info about networking from the
nanog list. But I do have to say that when I speak to the
i'm sure someone knows -exactly- what those two hops are, but they may
not be willing to say.
http://lists.elistx.com/archives/interesting-people/200605/msg00250.html
might be an explaination for the paranoid.
--bill
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:24:52AM +, Fergie wrote:
-BEGIN
ATT's 'internet free' mpls core?
randy
___
sent from a handheld, so even more terse than usual :-)
Bah, Humbug. Optical taps don't decrement TTLs or generate ICMP packets.
San Francisco Bay Area cable modem networks have transitioned from
@Home to ATT Broadband to Comcast, so there is probably all sorts of
expedient things done to keep it working through those transitions and
IP
Besides, why do you believe the text in an in-addr.arpa record? Or why do
you think the absence of an in-addr.arpa record is meaningful?
'cause i am a trusting sort... i tend to believe the DNS.
even more so when i can validate the signed replys...
the absence of
Besides, why do you believe the text in an in-addr.arpa record? Or why
do
you think the absence of an in-addr.arpa record is meaningful?
Back in the old days, say 10 years ago, you
could run a network by the seat of your pants
using rules of thumb about interpretation of
in-addr.arpa
... ;-)
scott
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Curious question on hop identity...
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:19:14 +
Besides, why do you believe the text in an in-addr.arpa record? Or why
do
you think the absence of an in-addr.arpa
] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Curious question on hop identity...
Besides, why do you believe the text in an in-addr.arpa record? Or
why
do
you think the absence of an in-addr.arpa record is meaningful?
Back
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Curious question on hop identity...
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:10:51 -0800
I'm pretty new to the networking world. While I don't run a huge and
complex network in a service provider market. We're just an enterprise
network. I have
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Jackson) [Fri 15 Dec 2006, 00:11 CET]:
I'm pretty new to the networking world. While I don't run a huge and
complex network in a service provider market. We're just an enterprise
network. I have read a lot of useful info about networking from the
nanog list. But
Scott Weeks wrote:
rant
I just have to add to this. I have worked with quite a few CC{IE, NP, SP, ...}
types lately that've been given lead positions and high responsibilities.
(Hell, some have .sigs that look like the dictionary. They're very good at
passing cert tests.) Many don't want
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Niels Bakker
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:31 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Curious question on hop identity...
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Jackson) [Fri 15 Dec 2006, 00:11
CET]:
I'm pretty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This may be far afield insofar as topic fodder, but I am curious
if anyone knows exactly what these two hops [9] [10] below,
actually are?
[snip]
[...]
5 165 ms 161 ms 183 ms 10g-9-1-ur04.sanjose.ca.sfba.comcast.net
[68.87.
192.49]
6
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Fergie wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This may be far afield insofar as topic fodder, but I am curious if
anyone knows exactly what these two hops [9] [10] below, actually are?
Wouldn't you like to know?
--
Alex Pilosov| DSL, Colocation,
On 2006-12-14-02:24:52, Fergie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be far afield insofar as topic fodder
Not in the slightest. To the contrary, it's one of the more on-topic
postings I've seen as of late, and I mean that with all sincerity.
I am curious if anyone knows exactly what these two
15 matches
Mail list logo
