Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i thought it was actually covered on-list... during the event, no?
I don't think it was especially covered on this list (you are no
doubt thinking of other lists). There was a lightning talk about it
in Toronto, for which slides can be found in the usual
Security of DNS servers is an issue for network operators, thus pertaining to
NANOG on-topics. This article shows a security-officer view of the recent DNS
attacks.
Despite well-publicized attacks on domain name servers in 2000 and 2001,
evidence suggests that many companies simply have not
MARLON BORBA wrote:
Security of DNS servers is an issue for network operators, thus pertaining to
NANOG on-topics. This article shows a security-officer view of the recent DNS
attacks.
Despite well-publicized attacks on domain name servers in 2000 and 2001, evidence
suggests that many
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:20:38AM -0200,
MARLON BORBA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
Security of DNS servers is an issue for network operators, thus
pertaining to NANOG on-topics. This article shows a security-officer
view of the recent DNS attacks.
It may be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephane Bortzmeyer) writes:
It may be on-topic but it is full of FUD, mistakes and blatant
b...t. Certainly not the recommended reading for the sysadmin.
i think you're being way to kind here.
The best stupid sentence is the one asking firewalls in front of the
DNS
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:01 +, Paul Vixie wrote:
the rest of the article is equally horrific in its maltreatment
and ignorance of facts.
It's an article in a CxO type magazine did anyone really expect
anything better?
-Jim P.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
mea culpa, mea maxima culpa :-(
my intention, when suggested that reading, was to get your attention about that
recent attack which targeted DNS top-level servers and to listen your opinions.
i promise not to post porn, ops, FUD material to nanog again.
Abraços,
Marlon Borba, CISSP,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, MARLON BORBA wrote:
my intention, when suggested that reading, was to get your attention
about that recent attack which targeted DNS top-level servers and to
i thought it was actually covered on-list... during the event, no?
listen your opinions. i promise not to post
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 04:22:44PM -0200, MARLON BORBA wrote:
mea culpa, mea maxima culpa :-(
my intention, when suggested that reading, was to get your attention about
that recent attack which targeted DNS top-level servers and to listen your
opinions.
i promise not to post porn, ops,
On 14-Feb-2007, at 13:38, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, MARLON BORBA wrote:
my intention, when suggested that reading, was to get your attention
about that recent attack which targeted DNS top-level servers and to
i thought it was actually covered on-list... during the
I don't think it was especially covered on this list (you are no
doubt thinking of other lists). There was a lightning talk about it
in Toronto, for which slides can be found in the usual place.
or I was thinking 'nanog meeting' not 'nanog list' :( oh well.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Chris L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
listen your opinions. i promise not to post porn, ops, FUD material to
nanog again.
no one said anything about porn...
-
router porn? Ohh, I never thought
12 matches
Mail list logo
