ICANN/Registry Agreement:

2004-02-26 Thread Deepak Jain
Doesn't sitefinder give one registry superior access to the registry's resources than the others, etc, etc? --- http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-apph-16apr01.htm VeriSign Equivalent Access Certification VeriSign, as Registry Operator (VGRS), makes the following

Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:

2004-02-26 Thread Brian Bruns
On Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:21 PM [EST], Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't sitefinder give one registry superior access to the registry's resources than the others, etc, etc? Rather then clutter up NANOG with this stuff, since its apparent that we will be having more issues

Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:

2004-02-26 Thread Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
[It isn't important who] wrote: It gives Verisign/NetSol the ability to generate exclusive profit from the hijacking of every non-existant domain name in existance. No other registar could do something like this without paying for every last domain they take, or could they ever do anything like

Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:

2004-02-26 Thread David Barak
--- Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...hijacking of every non-existent domain name in existence. ...non-existent ... in existence. Several people have said things like that in recent times. Including me, I'll bet. What exactly does it mean? (Yes, I know. We

Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:

2004-02-26 Thread Brian Bruns
On Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:21 PM [EST], Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't sitefinder give one registry superior access to the registry's resources than the others, etc, etc? It gives Verisign/NetSol the ability to generate exclusive profit from the hijacking of every