On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
[snip]
I am not sure that the difference between 500 and 800 is
that significant.
A recent snapshot at oregon-ix showed 1500 prefixes with such munged
origins. That's quite a few more than just everyone announcing EPs as
from
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:02:48 -0400
Joe Provo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
[snip]
I am not sure that the difference between 500 and 800 is
that significant.
A recent snapshot at oregon-ix showed 1500 prefixes with such
Hi, all.
] Define lots. I see about 500 inconsistent routes in BGP, have seen them
I see a few more than that:
http://www.cymru.com/BGP/incon01.html
Thanks,
Rob.
--
Rob Thomas
http://www.cymru.com
ASSERT(coffee != empty);
Hi, all.
Aside from the restaurants, how's Toronto? :)
] http://www.cymru.com/BGP/incon01.html
The list can be found here:
http://www.cymru.com/BGP/incon01-list.txt
This is the output of a very beta script. Comments welcome!
Thanks,
Rob.
--
Rob Thomas
http://www.cymru.com
ASSERT(coffee
I'm seeing about 150 such routes - I'm not collecting routing tables hence
my lower number. But, these routes on the whole dont match up with the
ones you've just posted Rob.. (being in the UK I guess I see a very
different view of the routing table..?)
I dont keep track of inconsistent
