On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:27:46AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 18:06:47 -0800 Scott Francis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure
they'll move to a newer version when somebody on the team gets a chance
to give it a thorough code audit, and run it
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 18:06:47 -0800 Scott Francis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure
they'll move to a newer version when somebody on the team gets a chance
to give it a thorough code audit, and run it through sufficient testing
prior to release.
The -current tree now is at BIND
## On 2003-01-28 17:49 - Paul Vixie typed:
PV
PV In any case, all of these makers (including Microsoft) seem to make a very
PV good faith effort to get patches out when vulnerabilities are uncovered. I
PV wish we could have put time bombs in older BINDs to force folks to upgrade,
PV but
What do you think of OpenBSD still installing BIND4 as part of the
default base system and recommended as secure by the OpenBSD FAQ ?
(See Section 6.8.3 in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#DNS )
i think that bind4 was relatively easy for them to do a format string
audit on, and that
On 1/28/03 11:57 AM, Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think of OpenBSD still installing BIND4 as part of the
default base system and recommended as secure by the OpenBSD FAQ ?
(See Section 6.8.3 in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#DNS )
i think that bind4 was
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:53:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip]
Hi Paul,
What do you think of OpenBSD still installing BIND4 as part of the
default base system and recommended as secure by the OpenBSD FAQ ?
(See Section 6.8.3 in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#DNS )
OpenBSD
