based on as much a guess on my part as paul's
I suspect, a little more below.
- -- Sue Joiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forwarding for Mohit Lad and Jonathan Park.
-sue
Sue Joiner
Merit Network
- Original Message
Subject:Unstable BGP Peerings?
Date: Sun, 13
Forwarding for Mohit Lad and Jonathan Park.
-sue
Sue Joiner
Merit Network
Original Message
Subject:Unstable BGP Peerings?
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:49:44 +
From: ParkJonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
.
-sue
Sue Joiner
Merit Network
- Original Message
Subject:Unstable BGP Peerings?
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:49:44 +
From: ParkJonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
During our recent study on BGP
I apologize if this is not the right forum, but I am grasping at
straws, already.
I have done thorough (latency) analysis, from various sites and/or
providers in China (CNC group, Beijing BII group, Sprintlink Asia
Pacific, China United Telecom, Sturhub PTE, Chinanet backone, Sichuan
Hi Simon,
with PAIX you surely get someone at PAIX do it for you, for
MAE West go to ep.net and submit a change...? I do not know
if PAIX does the reverse themselves, but for MAE West I am
sure.
It's as easy.
Regards,
Alexander
On Tue, 5 November 2002 20:28:06 +, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On
Subject: Peerings
Is there a standardized depository of information where lists of which AS´s
are present
in which exchange(s)? RADB does not really cut it since it only lists the
participants
of the interconnect, not really identifying the facility. Obviously I´m aware
that most
IXn
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
Is there a standardized depository of information where lists of which
AS´s are present in which exchange(s)? RADB does not really cut it since
it only lists the participants of the interconnect, not really
identifying the
On Tue Nov 05, 2002 at 01:09:06PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
Is there a standardized depository of information where lists of which
AS´s are present in which exchange(s)? RADB does not really cut it since
it only
Stalk them via DNS... that's as close as it gets. That URL updates once an
hour if people want to use it, but it really needs someone to design a
web interface with an updating list of what's new.
Of course, it'd help if IX operators kept their DNS updated. We're at
7 of the listed IX
Is there a standardized depository of information where lists of which AS´s
are present
in which exchange(s)? RADB does not really cut it since it only lists the
participants
of the interconnect, not really identifying the facility. Obviously I´m aware
that most
IXn list their participants on a
10 matches
Mail list logo
