Adam Clark said the following on 24/8/07 04:02:
I've noticed that http://www.nanog.org/filter.html is a little out of date,
and I was wondering if anyone knows whether any ISPs currnetly have issues
with /24 BGP advertisements for blocks outside of the traditional Class C
space?
My
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:14:27AM +1000, Philip Smith wrote:
Adam Clark said the following on 24/8/07 04:02:
I've noticed that http://www.nanog.org/filter.html is a little out of date,
and I was wondering if anyone knows whether any ISPs currnetly have issues
with /24 BGP
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:02:28AM -0700, Adam Clark wrote:
[snip]
We have some migrations to do from one space to another and having
the ability to do some /24 advertisements during that period would
be greatly helpful.
Always assume you have no visibility everywhere and that your
We have some migrations to do from one space to another and having
the ability to do some /24 advertisements during that period would
be greatly helpful.
Always assume you have no visibility everywhere and that your
squeakiest wheel will have some connection to a site you hadn't
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:27:31 -1000, Randy Bush said:
how? if i read you aright, you are saying that there will likely be a
few strange folk at the 'edges' of the internet who will have problems
and whine.
What percentage of those strange folk are the strange folk who have
problems and whine
Same question here.
We have a filtering appliance that filters for porn, etc based on a
subscription basis, but I've considered filtering phishing and spyware sites
for all our customers. At what point does the ISP wanting to do good
infringe upon the 'rights' of those who accidentally hurt
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:29:59 +0200, Arnold Nipper said:
On http://www.nanog.org/filter.html there is a small list of ISP filter
policies.
Does anyone know a more comprehensive and up-to-date list? Especially:
are all ISP filtering according to the minimum allocation?
*all* ISP? At
