On Oct 24, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Rod Beck wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:36, Henry Yen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Why are no major us builders installing FTTH today? Greenfield
should
be the easiest,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Why are no major us builders installing FTTH today? Greenfield should
be the easiest, and major builders like Pulte, Centex and the like
should be eager to offer it; but don't.
Well, Verizon seems to be making heavy bets on
I did consulting work for NTT in 2001 and 2002 and visited their Tokyo =
headquarters twice. NTT has two ILEC divisions, NTT East and NTT West. =
The ILEC management told me in conversations that there was no money in =
fiber-to-the-home; the entire rollout was due to government pressure and
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:36, Henry Yen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Why are no major us builders installing FTTH today? Greenfield should
be the easiest, and major builders like Pulte, Centex and the like
should be eager to offer it; but
In the future, people are not going to believe that we permitted this
to happen.
Coming soon: your plumbing will be disconnected. But never fear:
an Evian vending machine will delivered to every deserving household...
TV
On Oct 24, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Larry Smith wrote:
On Wednesday 24
While probably more good than bad, it is my understanding that when
Verizon (and others) provide FTTH (fiber to the home) they cut or
physically disconnect all other connections to that residence. so much
for any choice...
At least around here, if you tell the installer you have an
Here's timely article: KDDI says 900k target for fibre users 'difficult'
http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=20215email=html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Andersen
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:21 PM
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:36, Henry Yen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Why are no major us builders installing FTTH today? Greenfield should
be the easiest, and major builders like Pulte, Centex and the like
should be eager to offer it; but
Frank Bulk wrote:
Here's timely article: KDDI says 900k target for fibre users 'difficult'
http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=20215email=html
KDDI isn't the only ftfth provider... NTT east/west (flets), usen,
softbank/yahooBB and others all play in that space.
100/100 from
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Rod Beck wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:36, Henry Yen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Why are no major us builders installing FTTH today? Greenfield should
be the easiest, and major builders like Pulte, Centex and the like
Exactly. And because they installed fiber, the FCC has ruled that they
do not have to provide unbundled network elements to competitors.
It's this last bit that seems to be leading to lots of complaints, and
it's the earlier pricing of unbundled network elements at or above the
cost of
On Monday 22 October 2007 19:20, David Andersen wrote:
Followed by a recent explosion in fiber-to-the-home buildout by NTT.
About 8.8 million Japanese homes have fiber lines -- roughly nine
times the number in the United States. -- particularly impressive
when you count that in
On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 19:20, David Andersen wrote:
Followed by a recent explosion in fiber-to-the-home buildout by NTT.
About 8.8 million Japanese homes have fiber lines -- roughly nine
times the number in the United States. --
I did consulting work for NTT in 2001 and 2002 and visited their Tokyo
headquarters twice. NTT has two ILEC divisions, NTT East and NTT West. The ILEC
management told me in conversations that there was no money in
fiber-to-the-home; the entire rollout was due to government pressure and was
Yup, matches my experience (designing/deploying AOL's swan song JP
network infrastructure) during the same period.
The ILECs were artifacts of the Japanese regulators' 1997 effort to
relieve the last mile facilities death grip on services, ala the
(1984) US MFJ / ATT breakup. The new c.
In a message written on Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:20:49PM -0400, David Andersen
wrote:
The Washington Post article claims that:
[snip]
b) Fresh new wire installed after WWII
I have to wonder what percentage of the population is using phone
lines installed before WWII?
I live in a suburb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 23, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:20:49PM -0400,
David Andersen wrote:
The Washington Post article claims that:
[snip]
b) Fresh new wire installed after WWII
I have to wonder
David Andersen wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/28/AR2007082801990.html
snip
Followed by a recent explosion in fiber-to-the-home buildout by NTT.
About 8.8 million Japanese homes have fiber lines -- roughly nine times
the number in the United States. --
On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
David Andersen wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/28/
AR2007082801990.html
snip
Followed by a recent explosion in fiber-to-the-home buildout by
NTT. About 8.8 million Japanese homes have fiber lines --
Once upon a time, David Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But no - I was as happy as everyone else when the CLECs emerged and
provided PRI service at 1/3rd the rate of the ILECs
Not only was that CLEC service concetrated in higher-density areas, the
PRI prices were often not based in reality.
20 matches
Mail list logo
