If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel planning
beyond adding more channel blankets.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Carl Karsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:56 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adrian Chadd;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Bulk) wrote:
If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel planning
beyond adding more channel blankets.
Is that based on marketing, theory (based on the whitepapers and patent
descriptions) or practical experience?
Elmar.
: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 7:46 AM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Bulk) wrote:
If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel
planning
beyond adding more channel blankets
Frank Bulk wrote:
Foundry OEMs from Meru, which also uses a single-channel approach. It does
not have an L1 requirement.
Meru APs tunnel back to the controller, so any old L3 will do. We took an AP
home (just for grins) and it still worked back to our controller through
residential
Hard-earned knowledge:
Meru's single-channel approach has some compatability issues with
certain drivers, most notably Lenovo laptops with the Atheros chipset.
If you decide to go that route, make sure you have a USB key lying
around with the latest drivers from the Lenovo site for the T60's
,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Casey Callendrello
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:20 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
Hard-earned knowledge:
Meru's single
